组织工程和生物制造用于体外皮肤建模的研究进展

Q1 Computer Science Bioprinting Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00306
Sarah C. Wistner , Layla Rashad , Gymama Slaughter
{"title":"组织工程和生物制造用于体外皮肤建模的研究进展","authors":"Sarah C. Wistner ,&nbsp;Layla Rashad ,&nbsp;Gymama Slaughter","doi":"10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The global prevalence of skin disease and injury is continually increasing, yet conventional cell-based models used to study these conditions do not accurately reflect the complexity of human skin. The lack of inadequate </span><em>in vitro</em><span> modeling has resulted in reliance on animal-based models to test pharmaceuticals<span>, biomedical devices<span>, and industrial and environmental toxins to address clinical needs. These </span></span></span><em>in vivo</em><span> models are monetarily and morally expensive and are poor predictors of human tissue responses and clinical trial outcomes. The onset of three-dimensional (3D) culture techniques, such as cell-embedded and decellularized approaches, has offered accessible </span><em>in vitro</em><span> alternatives, using innovative scaffolds to improve cell-based models' structural and histological authenticity. However, these models lack adequate organizational control and complexity, resulting in variations between structures and the exclusion of physiologically relevant vascular and immunological features. Recently, biofabrication<span> strategies, which combine biology, engineering, and manufacturing capabilities, have emerged as instrumental tools to recreate the heterogeneity of human skin precisely. Bioprinting uses computer-aided design (CAD) to yield robust and reproducible skin prototypes with unprecedented control over tissue design and assembly. As the interdisciplinary nature of biofabrication grows, we look to the promise of next-generation biofabrication technologies, such as organ-on-a-chip (OOAC) and 4D modeling, to simulate human tissue behaviors more reliably for research, pharmaceutical, and regenerative medicine purposes. This review aims to discuss the barriers to developing clinically relevant skin models, describe the evolution of skin-inspired </span></span><em>in vitro</em> structures, analyze the current approaches to biofabricating 3D human skin mimetics, and define the opportunities and challenges in biofabricating skin tissue for preclinical and clinical uses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37770,"journal":{"name":"Bioprinting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in tissue engineering and biofabrication for in vitro skin modeling\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C. Wistner ,&nbsp;Layla Rashad ,&nbsp;Gymama Slaughter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The global prevalence of skin disease and injury is continually increasing, yet conventional cell-based models used to study these conditions do not accurately reflect the complexity of human skin. The lack of inadequate </span><em>in vitro</em><span> modeling has resulted in reliance on animal-based models to test pharmaceuticals<span>, biomedical devices<span>, and industrial and environmental toxins to address clinical needs. These </span></span></span><em>in vivo</em><span> models are monetarily and morally expensive and are poor predictors of human tissue responses and clinical trial outcomes. The onset of three-dimensional (3D) culture techniques, such as cell-embedded and decellularized approaches, has offered accessible </span><em>in vitro</em><span> alternatives, using innovative scaffolds to improve cell-based models' structural and histological authenticity. However, these models lack adequate organizational control and complexity, resulting in variations between structures and the exclusion of physiologically relevant vascular and immunological features. Recently, biofabrication<span> strategies, which combine biology, engineering, and manufacturing capabilities, have emerged as instrumental tools to recreate the heterogeneity of human skin precisely. Bioprinting uses computer-aided design (CAD) to yield robust and reproducible skin prototypes with unprecedented control over tissue design and assembly. As the interdisciplinary nature of biofabrication grows, we look to the promise of next-generation biofabrication technologies, such as organ-on-a-chip (OOAC) and 4D modeling, to simulate human tissue behaviors more reliably for research, pharmaceutical, and regenerative medicine purposes. This review aims to discuss the barriers to developing clinically relevant skin models, describe the evolution of skin-inspired </span></span><em>in vitro</em> structures, analyze the current approaches to biofabricating 3D human skin mimetics, and define the opportunities and challenges in biofabricating skin tissue for preclinical and clinical uses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioprinting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioprinting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886623000490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886623000490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮肤疾病和损伤的全球患病率正在不断增加,然而用于研究这些疾病的传统基于细胞的模型并不能准确反映人类皮肤的复杂性。缺乏足够的体外模型导致依赖动物模型来测试药物,生物医学设备以及工业和环境毒素以满足临床需求。这些体内模型在金钱和道德上都很昂贵,并且不能很好地预测人体组织反应和临床试验结果。三维(3D)培养技术的出现,如细胞嵌入和去细胞化方法,提供了可获得的体外替代方案,使用创新的支架来提高基于细胞的模型的结构和组织学真实性。然而,这些模型缺乏足够的组织控制和复杂性,导致结构之间的差异,并排除了生理相关的血管和免疫特征。最近,结合生物学、工程学和制造能力的生物制造策略已经成为精确重建人类皮肤异质性的工具。生物打印使用计算机辅助设计(CAD)产生健壮和可复制的皮肤原型,对组织设计和组装具有前所未有的控制。随着生物制造跨学科性质的发展,我们期待下一代生物制造技术的前景,如器官芯片(OOAC)和4D建模,以更可靠地模拟人体组织行为,用于研究,制药和再生医学目的。本综述旨在讨论开发临床相关皮肤模型的障碍,描述皮肤启发的体外结构的演变,分析目前生物制造3D人体皮肤模拟物的方法,并定义生物制造皮肤组织用于临床前和临床应用的机遇和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advances in tissue engineering and biofabrication for in vitro skin modeling

The global prevalence of skin disease and injury is continually increasing, yet conventional cell-based models used to study these conditions do not accurately reflect the complexity of human skin. The lack of inadequate in vitro modeling has resulted in reliance on animal-based models to test pharmaceuticals, biomedical devices, and industrial and environmental toxins to address clinical needs. These in vivo models are monetarily and morally expensive and are poor predictors of human tissue responses and clinical trial outcomes. The onset of three-dimensional (3D) culture techniques, such as cell-embedded and decellularized approaches, has offered accessible in vitro alternatives, using innovative scaffolds to improve cell-based models' structural and histological authenticity. However, these models lack adequate organizational control and complexity, resulting in variations between structures and the exclusion of physiologically relevant vascular and immunological features. Recently, biofabrication strategies, which combine biology, engineering, and manufacturing capabilities, have emerged as instrumental tools to recreate the heterogeneity of human skin precisely. Bioprinting uses computer-aided design (CAD) to yield robust and reproducible skin prototypes with unprecedented control over tissue design and assembly. As the interdisciplinary nature of biofabrication grows, we look to the promise of next-generation biofabrication technologies, such as organ-on-a-chip (OOAC) and 4D modeling, to simulate human tissue behaviors more reliably for research, pharmaceutical, and regenerative medicine purposes. This review aims to discuss the barriers to developing clinically relevant skin models, describe the evolution of skin-inspired in vitro structures, analyze the current approaches to biofabricating 3D human skin mimetics, and define the opportunities and challenges in biofabricating skin tissue for preclinical and clinical uses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioprinting
Bioprinting Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Bioprinting is a broad-spectrum, multidisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of 3D fabrication technology involving biological tissues, organs and cells for medical and biotechnology applications. Topics covered include nanomaterials, biomaterials, scaffolds, 3D printing technology, imaging and CAD/CAM software and hardware, post-printing bioreactor maturation, cell and biological factor patterning, biofabrication, tissue engineering and other applications of 3D bioprinting technology. Bioprinting publishes research reports describing novel results with high clinical significance in all areas of 3D bioprinting research. Bioprinting issues contain a wide variety of review and analysis articles covering topics relevant to 3D bioprinting ranging from basic biological, material and technical advances to pre-clinical and clinical applications of 3D bioprinting.
期刊最新文献
3D and 4D printed materials for cardiac transplantation: Advances in biogenerative engineering Evolution of toxicity testing platforms from 2D to advanced 3D bioprinting for safety assessment of drugs Robust design optimization of Critical Quality Indicators (CQIs) of medical-graded polycaprolactone (PCL) in bioplotting Recent advances in the development of stereolithography-based additive manufacturing processes: A review of applications and challenges Optimizing biomaterial inks: A study on the printability of Carboxymethyl cellulose-Laponite nanocomposite hydrogels and dental pulp stem cells bioprinting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1