Nan Li, D. Bullock, Carrie J. Butts-Wilmsmeyer, Laura F. Gentry, G. Goodwin, Jaeyeong Han, Nathan Kleczweski, N. F. Martin, P. Paulausky, Pete Pistorius, N. Seiter, N. Schroeder, A. Margenot
{"title":"不同的土壤健康指标与玉米产量的变化和砖沟硝酸盐损失有关","authors":"Nan Li, D. Bullock, Carrie J. Butts-Wilmsmeyer, Laura F. Gentry, G. Goodwin, Jaeyeong Han, Nathan Kleczweski, N. F. Martin, P. Paulausky, Pete Pistorius, N. Seiter, N. Schroeder, A. Margenot","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Associations between nitrogen (N) management and losses with soil health indicators (SHI) are widely presumed but relatively untested. An on‐farm experiment conducted in central Illinois was conducted to test potential relationships of SHI with agroecosystem outcomes of maize (Zea mays L.) yield and N losses under bounding N fertilization rates of 168 and 252 kg/ha. Chemical (n = 19), physical (n = 11), and biological (n = 14) SHI were measured at 24 locations within a 30‐ha field at five timepoints (V3, V10, RT, R6, and post‐harvest). Yields did not necessarily reflect N‐fertilization rates, with lowest yields (14.5 Mg/ha) under 224 kg/ha. Flow‐weighted nitrate‐N concentration was significantly higher under 168 kg N/ha (10.6 mg/L) relative to higher application rates, though cumulative tile nitrate‐N loads were similar. SHI varied more by sampling location and time than by N application rate. Depending on the time of sampling, distinct SHI were related to yield and tile N losses. Total soil carbon and permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) best explained yield variation, whereas POXC and sand content best explained variation in nitrate‐N loss. Nematode indices helped explain variability in yield (Simpson, Shannon) and nitrate‐N losses (Maturity), supporting recent propositions to integrate nematode measures into soil health assessments. This study provides a basis for expanding to multiyear assessments of SHI linkages with nutrient losses and crop productivity in the North Central US.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":22142,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct soil health indicators are associated with variation in maize yield and tile drain nitrate losses\",\"authors\":\"Nan Li, D. Bullock, Carrie J. Butts-Wilmsmeyer, Laura F. Gentry, G. Goodwin, Jaeyeong Han, Nathan Kleczweski, N. F. Martin, P. Paulausky, Pete Pistorius, N. Seiter, N. Schroeder, A. Margenot\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Associations between nitrogen (N) management and losses with soil health indicators (SHI) are widely presumed but relatively untested. An on‐farm experiment conducted in central Illinois was conducted to test potential relationships of SHI with agroecosystem outcomes of maize (Zea mays L.) yield and N losses under bounding N fertilization rates of 168 and 252 kg/ha. Chemical (n = 19), physical (n = 11), and biological (n = 14) SHI were measured at 24 locations within a 30‐ha field at five timepoints (V3, V10, RT, R6, and post‐harvest). Yields did not necessarily reflect N‐fertilization rates, with lowest yields (14.5 Mg/ha) under 224 kg/ha. Flow‐weighted nitrate‐N concentration was significantly higher under 168 kg N/ha (10.6 mg/L) relative to higher application rates, though cumulative tile nitrate‐N loads were similar. SHI varied more by sampling location and time than by N application rate. Depending on the time of sampling, distinct SHI were related to yield and tile N losses. Total soil carbon and permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) best explained yield variation, whereas POXC and sand content best explained variation in nitrate‐N loss. Nematode indices helped explain variability in yield (Simpson, Shannon) and nitrate‐N losses (Maturity), supporting recent propositions to integrate nematode measures into soil health assessments. This study provides a basis for expanding to multiyear assessments of SHI linkages with nutrient losses and crop productivity in the North Central US.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved\",\"PeriodicalId\":22142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Science Society of America Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Science Society of America Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20586\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
氮(N)管理和损失与土壤健康指标(SHI)之间的关系被广泛推测,但相对未经测试。在伊利诺伊州中部进行了一项田间试验,以测试在168和252公斤/公顷的边界氮施肥率下,SHI与玉米(Zea mays L.)产量和氮损失的农业生态系统结果的潜在关系。在五个时间点(V3、V10、RT、R6和收获后),在30公顷田地内的24个位置测量化学(n=19)、物理(n=11)和生物(n=14)SHI。产量并不一定反映氮肥施用率,224公斤/公顷以下的产量最低(14.5毫克/公顷)。流量加权硝酸盐-N浓度在168 kg N/ha(10.6 mg/L)下显著高于施用率,尽管累积硝酸盐-N负荷相似。SHI随采样位置和时间的变化大于随施氮量的变化。根据采样时间的不同,不同的SHI与产量和氮损失有关。土壤总碳和高锰酸盐可氧化碳(POXC)最能解释产量变化,而POXC和含砂量最能解释硝态氮损失的变化。线虫指数有助于解释产量(Simpson,Shannon)和硝态氮损失(成熟度)的可变性,支持最近将线虫测量纳入土壤健康评估的主张。这项研究为将SHI与美国中北部营养损失和作物生产力的联系扩展到多年评估提供了基础。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利
Distinct soil health indicators are associated with variation in maize yield and tile drain nitrate losses
Associations between nitrogen (N) management and losses with soil health indicators (SHI) are widely presumed but relatively untested. An on‐farm experiment conducted in central Illinois was conducted to test potential relationships of SHI with agroecosystem outcomes of maize (Zea mays L.) yield and N losses under bounding N fertilization rates of 168 and 252 kg/ha. Chemical (n = 19), physical (n = 11), and biological (n = 14) SHI were measured at 24 locations within a 30‐ha field at five timepoints (V3, V10, RT, R6, and post‐harvest). Yields did not necessarily reflect N‐fertilization rates, with lowest yields (14.5 Mg/ha) under 224 kg/ha. Flow‐weighted nitrate‐N concentration was significantly higher under 168 kg N/ha (10.6 mg/L) relative to higher application rates, though cumulative tile nitrate‐N loads were similar. SHI varied more by sampling location and time than by N application rate. Depending on the time of sampling, distinct SHI were related to yield and tile N losses. Total soil carbon and permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) best explained yield variation, whereas POXC and sand content best explained variation in nitrate‐N loss. Nematode indices helped explain variability in yield (Simpson, Shannon) and nitrate‐N losses (Maturity), supporting recent propositions to integrate nematode measures into soil health assessments. This study provides a basis for expanding to multiyear assessments of SHI linkages with nutrient losses and crop productivity in the North Central US.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
期刊介绍:
SSSA Journal publishes content on soil physics; hydrology; soil chemistry; soil biology; soil biochemistry; soil fertility; plant nutrition; pedology; soil and water conservation and management; forest, range, and wildland soils; soil and plant analysis; soil mineralogy, wetland soils. The audience is researchers, students, soil scientists, hydrologists, pedologist, geologists, agronomists, arborists, ecologists, engineers, certified practitioners, soil microbiologists, and environmentalists.
The journal publishes original research, issue papers, reviews, notes, comments and letters to the editor, and book reviews. Invitational papers may be published in the journal if accepted by the editorial board.