审查种族经纪人。

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY British Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.13063
John Nelson Robinson
{"title":"审查种族经纪人。","authors":"John Nelson Robinson","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.13063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>More than four decades ago, sociologist Thomas Pettigrew famously called residential segregation in the US the “linchpin” of racial inequality. Those words deeply influenced the discipline and have stuck with it through the years. Researchers have since widely documented the causes of segregation (things like unequal resource access, discrimination and residential preferences), as well as its effects (including individual- and neighborhood-level disparities in wealth, education, health, and more). But few studies explicitly aim to study the actual mechanisms and processes that connect segregation's broad causes with its broad consequences. Elizabeth Korver-Glenn's <i>Race Brokers</i>: <i>Housing Markets and Segregation in the 21st Century</i> marks the latest addition to that emerging literature. It draws from the author's multi-method study of real estate professionals in the Houston metro area. It includes a diverse but judiciously marshalled array of data: interviews with various types of professionals, ethnographic observations from shadowing them, and various quantitative analyses.</p><p><i>Race Brokers</i> makes two related, overarching contributions. First, the book identifies and explains the mechanisms driving segregation across various “stages” of the home-buying process. Specifically, it frames segregation as a problem of both continuity and change. At every turn, the book is saying: so much has changed over the years. But segregation persists. Why? For <i>Race Brokers</i>: that's the puzzle. The book is quite explicit and intentional about identifying what exactly is new about it. We see, for example, how actual mortgage denial today plays a smaller role in the exclusion of applicants of color from access to mortgage credit. Instead, white mortgage bankers almost exclusively “network” with white real estate agents and their clients. So the racial exclusion happens indirectly—but no less harmfully—through the formation of these exclusionary networks.</p><p>There are obviously many mechanisms and processes driving segregation. But a critical one highlighted by sociologists over the years is the “dual” structuring of the housing market. That is, housing market dynamics seem to behave differently in white versus nonwhite (especially black and Hispanic) areas: in racially different areas, we often find different types of housing stock, different types of housing-related businesses and organizations, and different ways of producing housing-related profits, for example, scholars linked to the racial capitalism literature frequently remind us that such markets exist relationally: the accumulation and appreciation of home values in white areas largely depends on the devaluation of property in non-white (and especially black and Hispanic) areas.</p><p>In <i>Race Brokers</i>, we see this racialized and relational construction of value across different Houston neighborhoods playing out in a detailed and devastating way. The game in white areas is to cheerlead buyers to follow their heart's desire, to take out bigger and bigger mortgages, to shell out more and more, to drive up prices as fast and far as they can possibly go. And perhaps most importantly, the game is to limit access to so-called high value clients--namely, white clients. In this game, the people who buy homes are not simply purchasing a thing worth a specific amount of money. Rather, they're buying into a long-term promise defined by fantasies of seemingly endless value appreciation over time. Meanwhile, the game in black and Hispanic areas is telling buyers that the home they want is in fact worth less than they're offering to pay for it. It's a game of asking both buyers and sellers to settle for less. It's a game of hunting for people vulnerable enough to sell their homes for cheap.</p><p>In this way, Korver-Glenn's story of the mechanisms that drive segregation ultimately pinpoints the housing market. And that leads to the book's second big contribution: it demystifies and denaturalizes the market itself. In doing so, the book provides an invaluable service. For most homebuyers, “the market” is rather abstract. You pull up <i>Zillow</i>, and the market is somehow already showing you listings of available homes. It's already identifying features you desire. It's already showing you very exact price points. It's not always clear where the information comes from, but for most people, it all seems fairly legit. And much of “the market” seems already set in place by the time people start looking for a home. The developers have already built the properties. The neighborhoods have already formed. The prices and values have already stabilized. Both the built environment and the prices attached to specific properties are things we tend to take at face value.</p><p>But as Korver-Glenn's findings show us, that abstraction is distorting. Specifically, it distorts the fact that, in housing markets, people with power make choices about where and how to distribute resources that determine living conditions and life chances for all of us. The big accomplishment of <i>Race Brokers</i> is that it demystifies so much of that. The book relentlessly shines light on the real people who actually make markets--on their real actions and the real consequences that follow. And that starts with the book's very layout and organization. The core chapters each introduce readers to a different type of housing market player: developers, agents, lenders, appraisers. The chapters explain their roles in great detail. We see how these different players collaborate - sharing resources, information and clients. We see how each plays a critical part in making the housing market “work.”</p><p>The book's profound lesson, however, is that very same qualities that make housing markets “work” in a functional sense also serve to perpetuate and entrench racial and economic disparities between places and populations. That is, the mechanisms that produce segregation are the same ones that give life and shape to “the market.” For example, economic sociologists often talk about “trust” as one of the key ingredients that enables markets to work. But in <i>Race Brokers</i>, we see the toxic side of trust. One agent, for example, described how white clients always asked her: “is this a Black neighborhood? Is this area Black?” Her response: “I just tell them to drive around.” And, as she drove around with them, she would help them point out racial clues, like tires lying around. The agent knew that such talk could violate Fair Housing regulations. But the fact, as Korver-Glenn writes, was that “white clients trusted white agents enough to feel comfortable asking them.” And the agents, “answered these inquiries in ways that were clear enough for White clients to understand their racial meaning.” That's how they fostered trust in clients, proving their “honesty” and “forthrightness.”</p><p>Likewise, expertise is another one of those key ingredients necessary for markets to function. But for the characters that we meet in <i>Race Brokers</i>, it is precisely their status as market “experts” that lends them extraordinary power to shape what we think and feel about race and place. They're the experts, for example, who use their authority to draw up the official maps used by agents, brokers, appraisers and other professionals. The maps, as Korver-Glenn shows, clearly exaggerate areas of white population. But few are likely to question that. They're the experts who devise guidelines for underwriting mortgage loans. Those guidelines are riddled with “gray areas,” where underwriters can easily make lending decisions based on racialized assumptions about applicants and their ethnic-sounding names. The book urges us to look closely at what expertise is actually doing here: it is legitimating people's gut feelings and beliefs about racial “others” and naturalizing the segregation that results.</p><p>While the book is not very long, it packs many insights and contributions. Readers should not miss the concluding chapter on policy recommendations. Korver-Glenn clearly took the time to develop proposals—including an overhaul of the appraisal structure—that are ambitious yet sensible, and which follow seamlessly from the book's empirical matter. <i>Race Brokers</i> is the author's first book but it already sits among the classics. I can assure you: scholars interested in housing, place-based inequalities, markets, race and racism, and policy will be reading, teaching and thinking with this book for many years to come.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"75 1","pages":"135-137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-4446.13063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of race brokers\",\"authors\":\"John Nelson Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-4446.13063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>More than four decades ago, sociologist Thomas Pettigrew famously called residential segregation in the US the “linchpin” of racial inequality. Those words deeply influenced the discipline and have stuck with it through the years. Researchers have since widely documented the causes of segregation (things like unequal resource access, discrimination and residential preferences), as well as its effects (including individual- and neighborhood-level disparities in wealth, education, health, and more). But few studies explicitly aim to study the actual mechanisms and processes that connect segregation's broad causes with its broad consequences. Elizabeth Korver-Glenn's <i>Race Brokers</i>: <i>Housing Markets and Segregation in the 21st Century</i> marks the latest addition to that emerging literature. It draws from the author's multi-method study of real estate professionals in the Houston metro area. It includes a diverse but judiciously marshalled array of data: interviews with various types of professionals, ethnographic observations from shadowing them, and various quantitative analyses.</p><p><i>Race Brokers</i> makes two related, overarching contributions. First, the book identifies and explains the mechanisms driving segregation across various “stages” of the home-buying process. Specifically, it frames segregation as a problem of both continuity and change. At every turn, the book is saying: so much has changed over the years. But segregation persists. Why? For <i>Race Brokers</i>: that's the puzzle. The book is quite explicit and intentional about identifying what exactly is new about it. We see, for example, how actual mortgage denial today plays a smaller role in the exclusion of applicants of color from access to mortgage credit. Instead, white mortgage bankers almost exclusively “network” with white real estate agents and their clients. So the racial exclusion happens indirectly—but no less harmfully—through the formation of these exclusionary networks.</p><p>There are obviously many mechanisms and processes driving segregation. But a critical one highlighted by sociologists over the years is the “dual” structuring of the housing market. That is, housing market dynamics seem to behave differently in white versus nonwhite (especially black and Hispanic) areas: in racially different areas, we often find different types of housing stock, different types of housing-related businesses and organizations, and different ways of producing housing-related profits, for example, scholars linked to the racial capitalism literature frequently remind us that such markets exist relationally: the accumulation and appreciation of home values in white areas largely depends on the devaluation of property in non-white (and especially black and Hispanic) areas.</p><p>In <i>Race Brokers</i>, we see this racialized and relational construction of value across different Houston neighborhoods playing out in a detailed and devastating way. The game in white areas is to cheerlead buyers to follow their heart's desire, to take out bigger and bigger mortgages, to shell out more and more, to drive up prices as fast and far as they can possibly go. And perhaps most importantly, the game is to limit access to so-called high value clients--namely, white clients. In this game, the people who buy homes are not simply purchasing a thing worth a specific amount of money. Rather, they're buying into a long-term promise defined by fantasies of seemingly endless value appreciation over time. Meanwhile, the game in black and Hispanic areas is telling buyers that the home they want is in fact worth less than they're offering to pay for it. It's a game of asking both buyers and sellers to settle for less. It's a game of hunting for people vulnerable enough to sell their homes for cheap.</p><p>In this way, Korver-Glenn's story of the mechanisms that drive segregation ultimately pinpoints the housing market. And that leads to the book's second big contribution: it demystifies and denaturalizes the market itself. In doing so, the book provides an invaluable service. For most homebuyers, “the market” is rather abstract. You pull up <i>Zillow</i>, and the market is somehow already showing you listings of available homes. It's already identifying features you desire. It's already showing you very exact price points. It's not always clear where the information comes from, but for most people, it all seems fairly legit. And much of “the market” seems already set in place by the time people start looking for a home. The developers have already built the properties. The neighborhoods have already formed. The prices and values have already stabilized. Both the built environment and the prices attached to specific properties are things we tend to take at face value.</p><p>But as Korver-Glenn's findings show us, that abstraction is distorting. Specifically, it distorts the fact that, in housing markets, people with power make choices about where and how to distribute resources that determine living conditions and life chances for all of us. The big accomplishment of <i>Race Brokers</i> is that it demystifies so much of that. The book relentlessly shines light on the real people who actually make markets--on their real actions and the real consequences that follow. And that starts with the book's very layout and organization. The core chapters each introduce readers to a different type of housing market player: developers, agents, lenders, appraisers. The chapters explain their roles in great detail. We see how these different players collaborate - sharing resources, information and clients. We see how each plays a critical part in making the housing market “work.”</p><p>The book's profound lesson, however, is that very same qualities that make housing markets “work” in a functional sense also serve to perpetuate and entrench racial and economic disparities between places and populations. That is, the mechanisms that produce segregation are the same ones that give life and shape to “the market.” For example, economic sociologists often talk about “trust” as one of the key ingredients that enables markets to work. But in <i>Race Brokers</i>, we see the toxic side of trust. One agent, for example, described how white clients always asked her: “is this a Black neighborhood? Is this area Black?” Her response: “I just tell them to drive around.” And, as she drove around with them, she would help them point out racial clues, like tires lying around. The agent knew that such talk could violate Fair Housing regulations. But the fact, as Korver-Glenn writes, was that “white clients trusted white agents enough to feel comfortable asking them.” And the agents, “answered these inquiries in ways that were clear enough for White clients to understand their racial meaning.” That's how they fostered trust in clients, proving their “honesty” and “forthrightness.”</p><p>Likewise, expertise is another one of those key ingredients necessary for markets to function. But for the characters that we meet in <i>Race Brokers</i>, it is precisely their status as market “experts” that lends them extraordinary power to shape what we think and feel about race and place. They're the experts, for example, who use their authority to draw up the official maps used by agents, brokers, appraisers and other professionals. The maps, as Korver-Glenn shows, clearly exaggerate areas of white population. But few are likely to question that. They're the experts who devise guidelines for underwriting mortgage loans. Those guidelines are riddled with “gray areas,” where underwriters can easily make lending decisions based on racialized assumptions about applicants and their ethnic-sounding names. The book urges us to look closely at what expertise is actually doing here: it is legitimating people's gut feelings and beliefs about racial “others” and naturalizing the segregation that results.</p><p>While the book is not very long, it packs many insights and contributions. Readers should not miss the concluding chapter on policy recommendations. Korver-Glenn clearly took the time to develop proposals—including an overhaul of the appraisal structure—that are ambitious yet sensible, and which follow seamlessly from the book's empirical matter. <i>Race Brokers</i> is the author's first book but it already sits among the classics. I can assure you: scholars interested in housing, place-based inequalities, markets, race and racism, and policy will be reading, teaching and thinking with this book for many years to come.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"135-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-4446.13063\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-4446.13063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-4446.13063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具体来说,它歪曲了这样一个事实:在住房市场上,有权力的人选择在哪里以及如何分配资源,而这些资源决定了我们所有人的生活条件和生活机会。种族掮客》的最大成就在于,它揭开了这一切的神秘面纱。该书毫不留情地揭示了真正的市场制造者--他们的真实行为以及随之而来的真实后果。这要从本书的编排和结构说起。核心章节分别向读者介绍了不同类型的房地产市场参与者:开发商、代理商、贷款人、评估师。这些章节详细解释了他们的角色。我们可以看到这些不同的参与者是如何合作的--共享资源、信息和客户。然而,本书的深刻教训是,使住房市场在功能意义上 "运作 "的那些特质,也会使不同地方和人群之间的种族和经济差距永久化和固化。也就是说,产生种族隔离的机制正是赋予 "市场 "生命和形态的机制。例如,经济社会学家经常把 "信任 "作为市场发挥作用的关键因素之一。但在《种族经纪人》中,我们看到了信任有毒的一面。例如,一位经纪人描述了白人客户如何总是问她:"这是黑人区吗?这个地区是黑人区吗?她的回答是她的回答是:"我只是让他们开车转转"。而且,当她开车带着他们四处转转时,她会帮他们指出种族线索,比如到处都是的轮胎。这位中介知道,这样的谈话可能会违反公平住房条例。但事实是,正如科尔弗-格伦(Korver-Glenn)所写的那样,"白人客户非常信任白人中介,可以放心地向他们询问"。"而中介 "回答这些询问的方式也足够明确,让白人客户明白其中的种族含义"。这就是他们培养客户信任的方式,证明了他们的 "诚实 "和 "直率"。"同样,专业知识也是市场运作所必需的另一个关键要素。但是,对于我们在《种族经纪人》中遇到的人物来说,正是因为他们的市场 "专家 "身份,才赋予了他们塑造我们对种族和地域的思考和感受的非凡力量。例如,他们是利用自己的权威来绘制经纪人、经纪人、评估师和其他专业人士所使用的官方地图的专家。正如科尔弗-格伦(Korver-Glenn)所展示的,这些地图明显夸大了白人居住的区域。但很少有人会对此提出质疑。他们是制定抵押贷款承保指南的专家。这些指导方针充斥着 "灰色地带",核保人员很容易根据对申请人及其听起来像种族的名字的种族化假设做出贷款决定。该书敦促我们仔细审视专业知识在这里的实际作用:它使人们对种族 "他人 "的直觉和信念合法化,并使由此产生的种族隔离自然化。读者不应错过最后关于政策建议的章节。科尔弗-格伦显然花了不少时间来制定建议--包括对评估结构进行彻底改革--这些建议雄心勃勃却又合情合理,而且与书中的实证研究内容相得益彰。种族经纪人》是作者的第一本书,但它已跻身经典之作行列。我可以向你保证:对住房、基于地方的不平等、市场、种族和种族主义以及政策感兴趣的学者在未来的许多年里都会阅读、教授和思考这本书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of race brokers

More than four decades ago, sociologist Thomas Pettigrew famously called residential segregation in the US the “linchpin” of racial inequality. Those words deeply influenced the discipline and have stuck with it through the years. Researchers have since widely documented the causes of segregation (things like unequal resource access, discrimination and residential preferences), as well as its effects (including individual- and neighborhood-level disparities in wealth, education, health, and more). But few studies explicitly aim to study the actual mechanisms and processes that connect segregation's broad causes with its broad consequences. Elizabeth Korver-Glenn's Race Brokers: Housing Markets and Segregation in the 21st Century marks the latest addition to that emerging literature. It draws from the author's multi-method study of real estate professionals in the Houston metro area. It includes a diverse but judiciously marshalled array of data: interviews with various types of professionals, ethnographic observations from shadowing them, and various quantitative analyses.

Race Brokers makes two related, overarching contributions. First, the book identifies and explains the mechanisms driving segregation across various “stages” of the home-buying process. Specifically, it frames segregation as a problem of both continuity and change. At every turn, the book is saying: so much has changed over the years. But segregation persists. Why? For Race Brokers: that's the puzzle. The book is quite explicit and intentional about identifying what exactly is new about it. We see, for example, how actual mortgage denial today plays a smaller role in the exclusion of applicants of color from access to mortgage credit. Instead, white mortgage bankers almost exclusively “network” with white real estate agents and their clients. So the racial exclusion happens indirectly—but no less harmfully—through the formation of these exclusionary networks.

There are obviously many mechanisms and processes driving segregation. But a critical one highlighted by sociologists over the years is the “dual” structuring of the housing market. That is, housing market dynamics seem to behave differently in white versus nonwhite (especially black and Hispanic) areas: in racially different areas, we often find different types of housing stock, different types of housing-related businesses and organizations, and different ways of producing housing-related profits, for example, scholars linked to the racial capitalism literature frequently remind us that such markets exist relationally: the accumulation and appreciation of home values in white areas largely depends on the devaluation of property in non-white (and especially black and Hispanic) areas.

In Race Brokers, we see this racialized and relational construction of value across different Houston neighborhoods playing out in a detailed and devastating way. The game in white areas is to cheerlead buyers to follow their heart's desire, to take out bigger and bigger mortgages, to shell out more and more, to drive up prices as fast and far as they can possibly go. And perhaps most importantly, the game is to limit access to so-called high value clients--namely, white clients. In this game, the people who buy homes are not simply purchasing a thing worth a specific amount of money. Rather, they're buying into a long-term promise defined by fantasies of seemingly endless value appreciation over time. Meanwhile, the game in black and Hispanic areas is telling buyers that the home they want is in fact worth less than they're offering to pay for it. It's a game of asking both buyers and sellers to settle for less. It's a game of hunting for people vulnerable enough to sell their homes for cheap.

In this way, Korver-Glenn's story of the mechanisms that drive segregation ultimately pinpoints the housing market. And that leads to the book's second big contribution: it demystifies and denaturalizes the market itself. In doing so, the book provides an invaluable service. For most homebuyers, “the market” is rather abstract. You pull up Zillow, and the market is somehow already showing you listings of available homes. It's already identifying features you desire. It's already showing you very exact price points. It's not always clear where the information comes from, but for most people, it all seems fairly legit. And much of “the market” seems already set in place by the time people start looking for a home. The developers have already built the properties. The neighborhoods have already formed. The prices and values have already stabilized. Both the built environment and the prices attached to specific properties are things we tend to take at face value.

But as Korver-Glenn's findings show us, that abstraction is distorting. Specifically, it distorts the fact that, in housing markets, people with power make choices about where and how to distribute resources that determine living conditions and life chances for all of us. The big accomplishment of Race Brokers is that it demystifies so much of that. The book relentlessly shines light on the real people who actually make markets--on their real actions and the real consequences that follow. And that starts with the book's very layout and organization. The core chapters each introduce readers to a different type of housing market player: developers, agents, lenders, appraisers. The chapters explain their roles in great detail. We see how these different players collaborate - sharing resources, information and clients. We see how each plays a critical part in making the housing market “work.”

The book's profound lesson, however, is that very same qualities that make housing markets “work” in a functional sense also serve to perpetuate and entrench racial and economic disparities between places and populations. That is, the mechanisms that produce segregation are the same ones that give life and shape to “the market.” For example, economic sociologists often talk about “trust” as one of the key ingredients that enables markets to work. But in Race Brokers, we see the toxic side of trust. One agent, for example, described how white clients always asked her: “is this a Black neighborhood? Is this area Black?” Her response: “I just tell them to drive around.” And, as she drove around with them, she would help them point out racial clues, like tires lying around. The agent knew that such talk could violate Fair Housing regulations. But the fact, as Korver-Glenn writes, was that “white clients trusted white agents enough to feel comfortable asking them.” And the agents, “answered these inquiries in ways that were clear enough for White clients to understand their racial meaning.” That's how they fostered trust in clients, proving their “honesty” and “forthrightness.”

Likewise, expertise is another one of those key ingredients necessary for markets to function. But for the characters that we meet in Race Brokers, it is precisely their status as market “experts” that lends them extraordinary power to shape what we think and feel about race and place. They're the experts, for example, who use their authority to draw up the official maps used by agents, brokers, appraisers and other professionals. The maps, as Korver-Glenn shows, clearly exaggerate areas of white population. But few are likely to question that. They're the experts who devise guidelines for underwriting mortgage loans. Those guidelines are riddled with “gray areas,” where underwriters can easily make lending decisions based on racialized assumptions about applicants and their ethnic-sounding names. The book urges us to look closely at what expertise is actually doing here: it is legitimating people's gut feelings and beliefs about racial “others” and naturalizing the segregation that results.

While the book is not very long, it packs many insights and contributions. Readers should not miss the concluding chapter on policy recommendations. Korver-Glenn clearly took the time to develop proposals—including an overhaul of the appraisal structure—that are ambitious yet sensible, and which follow seamlessly from the book's empirical matter. Race Brokers is the author's first book but it already sits among the classics. I can assure you: scholars interested in housing, place-based inequalities, markets, race and racism, and policy will be reading, teaching and thinking with this book for many years to come.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: British Journal of Sociology is published on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) is unique in the United Kingdom in its concentration on teaching and research across the full range of the social, political and economic sciences. Founded in 1895 by Beatrice and Sidney Webb, the LSE is one of the largest colleges within the University of London and has an outstanding reputation for academic excellence nationally and internationally. Mission Statement: • To be a leading sociology journal in terms of academic substance, scholarly reputation , with relevance to and impact on the social and democratic questions of our times • To publish papers demonstrating the highest standards of scholarship in sociology from authors worldwide; • To carry papers from across the full range of sociological research and knowledge • To lead debate on key methodological and theoretical questions and controversies in contemporary sociology, for example through the annual lecture special issue • To highlight new areas of sociological research, new developments in sociological theory, and new methodological innovations, for example through timely special sections and special issues • To react quickly to major publishing and/or world events by producing special issues and/or sections • To publish the best work from scholars in new and emerging regions where sociology is developing • To encourage new and aspiring sociologists to submit papers to the journal, and to spotlight their work through the early career prize • To engage with the sociological community – academics as well as students – in the UK and abroad, through social media, and a journal blog.
期刊最新文献
Lagging behind by doing good: How volunteering prolongs unemployment. The dispositif is alive! Recovering social agents in Foucauldian analysis. The social life of creative methods: Filmmaking, fabulation and recovery. Disruptive diversity: Exploring racial commodification in the Norwegian cultural field. The temporality of memory politics: An analysis of Russian state media narratives on the war in Ukraine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1