健康人群的状态焦虑会增加他们对工作记忆中的中性干扰的脆弱性,但不会增加对不愉快干扰的脆弱性

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinica Y Salud Pub Date : 2014-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.002
Javier García-Pacios , David Del Río , Fernando Maestú
{"title":"健康人群的状态焦虑会增加他们对工作记忆中的中性干扰的脆弱性,但不会增加对不愉快干扰的脆弱性","authors":"Javier García-Pacios ,&nbsp;David Del Río ,&nbsp;Fernando Maestú","doi":"10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unpleasant irrelevant events are known to negatively affect our capacity to maintain neutral but task- relevant information in working memory (WM). In parallel, anxiety biases our attentional responses to those stimuli that may be potentially threatening in order to adaptively enhance their detection and assessment. In this study, we investigated differences between healthy anxious and non-anxious volunteers while they performed a WM task in which neutral and unpleasant pictures were presented as distractors. Our results revealed that state anxiety could increase the interfering effect of neutral but not unpleasant distractors. These findings are discussed in regard to previous studies suggesting that anxiety and acute stress can decrease the level of specificity in the vigilance mechanism that serves to optimize the detection and evaluation of threats.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45730,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State anxiety in healthy people can increase their vulnerability to neutral but not to unpleasant distraction in working memory\",\"authors\":\"Javier García-Pacios ,&nbsp;David Del Río ,&nbsp;Fernando Maestú\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Unpleasant irrelevant events are known to negatively affect our capacity to maintain neutral but task- relevant information in working memory (WM). In parallel, anxiety biases our attentional responses to those stimuli that may be potentially threatening in order to adaptively enhance their detection and assessment. In this study, we investigated differences between healthy anxious and non-anxious volunteers while they performed a WM task in which neutral and unpleasant pictures were presented as distractors. Our results revealed that state anxiety could increase the interfering effect of neutral but not unpleasant distractors. These findings are discussed in regard to previous studies suggesting that anxiety and acute stress can decrease the level of specificity in the vigilance mechanism that serves to optimize the detection and evaluation of threats.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica Y Salud\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.002\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica Y Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113052741400019X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113052741400019X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

众所周知,不愉快的不相关事件会对我们在工作记忆(WM)中保持中性但与任务相关的信息的能力产生负面影响。与此同时,焦虑会使我们对那些可能具有潜在威胁的刺激的注意力反应产生偏差,从而自适应地增强对它们的检测和评估。在这项研究中,我们调查了健康的焦虑志愿者和非焦虑志愿者在执行一项以中性和不愉快的图片作为干扰物的WM任务时的差异。结果表明,状态焦虑可以增加中性干扰物的干扰作用,但不增加不愉快干扰物的干扰作用。这些发现与先前的研究结果相结合,表明焦虑和急性应激可以降低警觉性机制的特异性水平,从而优化对威胁的检测和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State anxiety in healthy people can increase their vulnerability to neutral but not to unpleasant distraction in working memory

Unpleasant irrelevant events are known to negatively affect our capacity to maintain neutral but task- relevant information in working memory (WM). In parallel, anxiety biases our attentional responses to those stimuli that may be potentially threatening in order to adaptively enhance their detection and assessment. In this study, we investigated differences between healthy anxious and non-anxious volunteers while they performed a WM task in which neutral and unpleasant pictures were presented as distractors. Our results revealed that state anxiety could increase the interfering effect of neutral but not unpleasant distractors. These findings are discussed in regard to previous studies suggesting that anxiety and acute stress can decrease the level of specificity in the vigilance mechanism that serves to optimize the detection and evaluation of threats.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Y Salud
Clinica Y Salud PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sobre la Validez y Eficacia de la Hipnosis Clínica. Valoración Crítica del Documento Observatorio OMC contra las Pseudociencias, Pseudoterapias, Intrusismo y Sectas Sanitarias en relación con la Hipnoterapia Un estudio de caso de trastorno adaptativo con ansiedad por situación de sobrecarga laboral Trastorno de síntomas somáticos: de la sospecha de simulación al tratamiento cognitivo-conductual Psychological characteristics of dissociation in general population Espiritualmente resilientes. Relación entre espiritualidad y resiliencia en cuidados paliativos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1