COVID-19:欧米克隆——最新的、毒性最小的,但可能不是SARS-CoV-2的最后一个变体

IF 4.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Microbial Biotechnology Pub Date : 2022-04-20 DOI:10.1111/1751-7915.14064
Harald Brüssow
{"title":"COVID-19:欧米克隆——最新的、毒性最小的,但可能不是SARS-CoV-2的最后一个变体","authors":"Harald Brüssow","doi":"10.1111/1751-7915.14064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Omicron variant rapidly became the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strain in South Africa and elsewhere. This review explores whether this rise was due to an increased transmission of the variant or its escape from population immunity by an extensively mutated spike protein. The mutations affected the structure of the spike protein leading to the loss of neutralization by most, but not all, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Omicron also shows substantial immune escape from serum antibodies in convalescent patients and vaccinees. A booster immunization increased, however, the titre and breadth of antiviral antibody response. The cellular immune response against Omicron was largely preserved explaining a satisfying protection of boosted vaccinees against severe infections. Clinicians observed less severe infection with Omicron, but other scientists warned that this must not necessarily reflect less intrinsic virulence. However, in animal experiments with mice and hamsters, Omicron infections also displayed a lesser virulence than previous VOCs and lung functions were less compromised. Cell biologists demonstrated that Omicron differs from Delta by preferring the endocytic pathway for cell entry over fusion with the plasma membrane which might explain Omicron’s distinct replication along the respiratory tract compared with Delta. Omicron represents a distinct evolutionary lineage that deviated from the mainstream of evolving SARS-CoV-2 already in mid-2020 raising questions about where it circulated before getting widespread in December 2021. The role of Omicron for the future trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49145,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Biotechnology","volume":"15 7","pages":"1927-1939"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ami-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1751-7915.14064","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19: Omicron – the latest, the least virulent, but probably not the last variant of concern of SARS-CoV-2\",\"authors\":\"Harald Brüssow\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1751-7915.14064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Omicron variant rapidly became the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strain in South Africa and elsewhere. This review explores whether this rise was due to an increased transmission of the variant or its escape from population immunity by an extensively mutated spike protein. The mutations affected the structure of the spike protein leading to the loss of neutralization by most, but not all, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Omicron also shows substantial immune escape from serum antibodies in convalescent patients and vaccinees. A booster immunization increased, however, the titre and breadth of antiviral antibody response. The cellular immune response against Omicron was largely preserved explaining a satisfying protection of boosted vaccinees against severe infections. Clinicians observed less severe infection with Omicron, but other scientists warned that this must not necessarily reflect less intrinsic virulence. However, in animal experiments with mice and hamsters, Omicron infections also displayed a lesser virulence than previous VOCs and lung functions were less compromised. Cell biologists demonstrated that Omicron differs from Delta by preferring the endocytic pathway for cell entry over fusion with the plasma membrane which might explain Omicron’s distinct replication along the respiratory tract compared with Delta. Omicron represents a distinct evolutionary lineage that deviated from the mainstream of evolving SARS-CoV-2 already in mid-2020 raising questions about where it circulated before getting widespread in December 2021. The role of Omicron for the future trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic is discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"15 7\",\"pages\":\"1927-1939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ami-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1751-7915.14064\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-7915.14064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-7915.14064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

在南非和其他地方,欧米克隆变种迅速成为占主导地位的SARS-CoV-2菌株。这篇综述探讨了这种上升是由于变异传播的增加还是由于它通过广泛突变的刺突蛋白从群体免疫中逃脱。突变影响了刺突蛋白的结构,导致大多数(但不是全部)治疗性单克隆抗体失去中和作用。在恢复期患者和疫苗接种者中也显示出大量的血清抗体免疫逃逸。然而,加强免疫增加了抗病毒抗体反应的滴度和广度。对Omicron的细胞免疫反应在很大程度上被保留了下来,解释了增强疫苗对严重感染的令人满意的保护。临床医生观察到Omicron感染的严重程度较低,但其他科学家警告说,这并不一定反映出内在毒性较低。然而,在小鼠和仓鼠的动物实验中,Omicron感染也显示出比以前的挥发性有机化合物更小的毒性,肺功能也更少受到损害。细胞生物学家证明,与Delta相比,Omicron更倾向于通过内吞途径进入细胞,而不是与质膜融合,这可能解释了与Delta相比,Omicron在呼吸道的独特复制。欧米克隆代表了一种独特的进化谱系,它在2020年中期就偏离了SARS-CoV-2进化的主流,这引发了人们对它在2021年12月广泛传播之前的传播地点的质疑。讨论了欧米克隆在COVID-19大流行未来轨迹中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19: Omicron – the latest, the least virulent, but probably not the last variant of concern of SARS-CoV-2

The Omicron variant rapidly became the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strain in South Africa and elsewhere. This review explores whether this rise was due to an increased transmission of the variant or its escape from population immunity by an extensively mutated spike protein. The mutations affected the structure of the spike protein leading to the loss of neutralization by most, but not all, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Omicron also shows substantial immune escape from serum antibodies in convalescent patients and vaccinees. A booster immunization increased, however, the titre and breadth of antiviral antibody response. The cellular immune response against Omicron was largely preserved explaining a satisfying protection of boosted vaccinees against severe infections. Clinicians observed less severe infection with Omicron, but other scientists warned that this must not necessarily reflect less intrinsic virulence. However, in animal experiments with mice and hamsters, Omicron infections also displayed a lesser virulence than previous VOCs and lung functions were less compromised. Cell biologists demonstrated that Omicron differs from Delta by preferring the endocytic pathway for cell entry over fusion with the plasma membrane which might explain Omicron’s distinct replication along the respiratory tract compared with Delta. Omicron represents a distinct evolutionary lineage that deviated from the mainstream of evolving SARS-CoV-2 already in mid-2020 raising questions about where it circulated before getting widespread in December 2021. The role of Omicron for the future trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic is discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbial Biotechnology
Microbial Biotechnology BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
3.50%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbial Biotechnology publishes papers of original research reporting significant advances in any aspect of microbial applications, including, but not limited to biotechnologies related to: Green chemistry; Primary metabolites; Food, beverages and supplements; Secondary metabolites and natural products; Pharmaceuticals; Diagnostics; Agriculture; Bioenergy; Biomining, including oil recovery and processing; Bioremediation; Biopolymers, biomaterials; Bionanotechnology; Biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers; Compatible solutes and bioprotectants; Biosensors, monitoring systems, quantitative microbial risk assessment; Technology development; Protein engineering; Functional genomics; Metabolic engineering; Metabolic design; Systems analysis, modelling; Process engineering; Biologically-based analytical methods; Microbially-based strategies in public health; Microbially-based strategies to influence global processes
期刊最新文献
Web alert: Fabrication with microbial spores Issue Information Web alert: Metagenomic mining for biotechnology Issue Information Non-A to E hepatitis in children: Detecting a novel viral epidemic during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1