国际空间站雷电成像传感器性能评价

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, OCEAN Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1175/jtech-d-22-0120.1
Daile Zhang, K. Cummins, T. Lang, D. Buechler, S. Rudlosky
{"title":"国际空间站雷电成像传感器性能评价","authors":"Daile Zhang, K. Cummins, T. Lang, D. Buechler, S. Rudlosky","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-22-0120.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nOptical lightning observations from low-Earth orbit play an important role in our understanding of long-term global lightning trends. Lightning Imaging Sensors (LIS) on the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) satellite (1997-2015) and International Space Station (2017-present) capture optical emissions produced by lightning. This study uses the well-documented TRMM LIS performance to determine if the ISS LIS performs well enough to bridge the gap between TRMM LIS and the new generation of Geostationary Lightning Mappers (GLMs). The average events per group and groups per flash for ISS LIS are 3.6 and 9.9, which are 25% and 10% lower than TRMM LIS, respectively. ISS LIS has 30% lower mean group energy density and 30-50% lower mean flash energy density than TRMM LIS in their common (+/−38 degree) latitude range. These differences are likely the result of larger pixel areas for ISS LIS over most of the field-of-view due to off-nadir pointing, combined with viewing obstructions and possible engineering differences. For both instruments, radiometric sensitivity decreases radially from the center of the array to the edges. ISS LIS sensitivity falls-off faster and more-variably, contributed to by the off-nadir pointing. Event energy density analysis indicate some anomalous hotspot pixels in the ISS LIS pixel array that were not present with the TRMM LIS. Despite these differences, ISS LIS provides similar parameter values to TRMM LIS with the expectation of somewhat lower lightning detection capability. In addition, recalculation of the event, group, and flash areas for both LIS datasets are strongly recommended since the archived values in the current release versions have significant errors.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of the Lightning Imaging Sensor on the International Space Station\",\"authors\":\"Daile Zhang, K. Cummins, T. Lang, D. Buechler, S. Rudlosky\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jtech-d-22-0120.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nOptical lightning observations from low-Earth orbit play an important role in our understanding of long-term global lightning trends. Lightning Imaging Sensors (LIS) on the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) satellite (1997-2015) and International Space Station (2017-present) capture optical emissions produced by lightning. This study uses the well-documented TRMM LIS performance to determine if the ISS LIS performs well enough to bridge the gap between TRMM LIS and the new generation of Geostationary Lightning Mappers (GLMs). The average events per group and groups per flash for ISS LIS are 3.6 and 9.9, which are 25% and 10% lower than TRMM LIS, respectively. ISS LIS has 30% lower mean group energy density and 30-50% lower mean flash energy density than TRMM LIS in their common (+/−38 degree) latitude range. These differences are likely the result of larger pixel areas for ISS LIS over most of the field-of-view due to off-nadir pointing, combined with viewing obstructions and possible engineering differences. For both instruments, radiometric sensitivity decreases radially from the center of the array to the edges. ISS LIS sensitivity falls-off faster and more-variably, contributed to by the off-nadir pointing. Event energy density analysis indicate some anomalous hotspot pixels in the ISS LIS pixel array that were not present with the TRMM LIS. Despite these differences, ISS LIS provides similar parameter values to TRMM LIS with the expectation of somewhat lower lightning detection capability. In addition, recalculation of the event, group, and flash areas for both LIS datasets are strongly recommended since the archived values in the current release versions have significant errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-22-0120.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, OCEAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-22-0120.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近地轨道光学闪电观测对我们了解长期全球闪电趋势起着重要作用。热带降雨测量任务(TRMM)卫星(1997-2015年)和国际空间站(2017年至今)上的闪电成像传感器(LIS)捕获闪电产生的光发射。本研究使用记录良好的TRMM LIS性能来确定ISS LIS是否表现良好,足以弥补TRMM LIS与新一代地球静止闪电绘图仪(GLMs)之间的差距。ISS LIS每组和每组闪光的平均事件数分别为3.6和9.9,分别比TRMM LIS低25%和10%。在其共同纬度(+/−38度)范围内,ISS LIS的平均基团能量密度比TRMM LIS低30%,平均闪光能量密度比TRMM LIS低30-50%。这些差异可能是由于ISS LIS在大多数视场中由于非最低点指向而产生的较大像素区域,再加上观看障碍和可能的工程差异。对于这两种仪器,辐射灵敏度从阵列中心到边缘呈放射状递减。ISS的灵敏度下降得更快,变化更大,这是由非最低点指向造成的。事件能量密度分析表明,在ISS LIS像元阵列中存在TRMM LIS不存在的异常热点像元。尽管存在这些差异,ISS LIS提供了与TRMM LIS相似的参数值,但预期闪电探测能力略低。此外,强烈建议重新计算两个LIS数据集的事件、组和flash区域,因为当前发布版本中的存档值存在重大错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Evaluation of the Lightning Imaging Sensor on the International Space Station
Optical lightning observations from low-Earth orbit play an important role in our understanding of long-term global lightning trends. Lightning Imaging Sensors (LIS) on the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) satellite (1997-2015) and International Space Station (2017-present) capture optical emissions produced by lightning. This study uses the well-documented TRMM LIS performance to determine if the ISS LIS performs well enough to bridge the gap between TRMM LIS and the new generation of Geostationary Lightning Mappers (GLMs). The average events per group and groups per flash for ISS LIS are 3.6 and 9.9, which are 25% and 10% lower than TRMM LIS, respectively. ISS LIS has 30% lower mean group energy density and 30-50% lower mean flash energy density than TRMM LIS in their common (+/−38 degree) latitude range. These differences are likely the result of larger pixel areas for ISS LIS over most of the field-of-view due to off-nadir pointing, combined with viewing obstructions and possible engineering differences. For both instruments, radiometric sensitivity decreases radially from the center of the array to the edges. ISS LIS sensitivity falls-off faster and more-variably, contributed to by the off-nadir pointing. Event energy density analysis indicate some anomalous hotspot pixels in the ISS LIS pixel array that were not present with the TRMM LIS. Despite these differences, ISS LIS provides similar parameter values to TRMM LIS with the expectation of somewhat lower lightning detection capability. In addition, recalculation of the event, group, and flash areas for both LIS datasets are strongly recommended since the archived values in the current release versions have significant errors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic retrievals of ice in high clouds from elastic backscatter lidar, Ku-band radar and submillimeter wave radiometer observations A Versatile Calibration Method for Rotary-Wing UAS as Wind Measurement Systems A Case of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension/Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome Cured by Myomectomy. Optimum Estimation of Coastal Currents Using Moving Vehicles Evaluation and Intercomparison of Small Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Used for Atmospheric Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1