从Volodymyr Hnatiuk关于乌克兰俄罗斯人的民间传说和民族志作品中理解东欧的多元文化主义

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY Rusin Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17223/18572685/67/19
M. Lanovyk, Z. Lanovyk
{"title":"从Volodymyr Hnatiuk关于乌克兰俄罗斯人的民间传说和民族志作品中理解东欧的多元文化主义","authors":"M. Lanovyk, Z. Lanovyk","doi":"10.17223/18572685/67/19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the research, Academician Volodymyr Hnatiuk's scholarly inquiry had focused on the elements of multiculturalism long before the theory of multiculturalism was developed. Hnatiuk studied the problems of coexistence of different ethnic groups in the multicultural realm of the Eastern European area, with a partucLuar attention to the Ugrian Rusins. In his research, Hnatiuk employed basic concepts for modern multicultural studies, such as historically determined multicultural space of Eastern Europe, which combines national and ideological heterogeneity, cultural diffusion and social homogeneity. Yet the authors emphasize that Hnatiuk paid attention to the dominant concepts of ethnocultural frontiers, the contamination of ethnological and psychomental phenomena, the problems of preservation/Loss of the national identity, the political consensus in a poLyethnic society, the polyphony of national consciousness, and others. The multilevel reception of other ethnic groups by the Rusins is studied on the Materials from Ugric Rus (1897-1911) collected and processed by Hnatiuk. The primary role in this cultural topos is assigned to the Slavic nations, who are more often perceived in the plane of rapprochement rather than distance in the dichotomy of In-group/Out-group. The second level is interaction with non-Slavic European nations (Germans, Hungarians). However, the non-European influences were often a factor in the formation of Eastern European identity: the Jewish influence through the biblical books, as well as Central Asian influences from the Turkish attacks and the Ottoman rule in these lands. The authors conclude that the muLticuLturaList methodology expands the geocuLturaL context of ethnological research. The processed material convincingly proves that it can be applied to the European cultural and historical discourses of previous epochs, which contain the features provided by this theory.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the multiculturalism of Eastern Europe in the folklore and ethnographic works of Volodymyr Hnatiuk about the Ugrian Rusins\",\"authors\":\"M. Lanovyk, Z. Lanovyk\",\"doi\":\"10.17223/18572685/67/19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the research, Academician Volodymyr Hnatiuk's scholarly inquiry had focused on the elements of multiculturalism long before the theory of multiculturalism was developed. Hnatiuk studied the problems of coexistence of different ethnic groups in the multicultural realm of the Eastern European area, with a partucLuar attention to the Ugrian Rusins. In his research, Hnatiuk employed basic concepts for modern multicultural studies, such as historically determined multicultural space of Eastern Europe, which combines national and ideological heterogeneity, cultural diffusion and social homogeneity. Yet the authors emphasize that Hnatiuk paid attention to the dominant concepts of ethnocultural frontiers, the contamination of ethnological and psychomental phenomena, the problems of preservation/Loss of the national identity, the political consensus in a poLyethnic society, the polyphony of national consciousness, and others. The multilevel reception of other ethnic groups by the Rusins is studied on the Materials from Ugric Rus (1897-1911) collected and processed by Hnatiuk. The primary role in this cultural topos is assigned to the Slavic nations, who are more often perceived in the plane of rapprochement rather than distance in the dichotomy of In-group/Out-group. The second level is interaction with non-Slavic European nations (Germans, Hungarians). However, the non-European influences were often a factor in the formation of Eastern European identity: the Jewish influence through the biblical books, as well as Central Asian influences from the Turkish attacks and the Ottoman rule in these lands. The authors conclude that the muLticuLturaList methodology expands the geocuLturaL context of ethnological research. The processed material convincingly proves that it can be applied to the European cultural and historical discourses of previous epochs, which contain the features provided by this theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rusin\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rusin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/67/19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rusin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/67/19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,早在多元文化主义理论形成之前,Volodymyr Hnatiuk院士的学术探究就已经集中在多元文化主义的要素上。Hnatiuk研究了东欧地区多元文化领域内不同种族群体共存的问题,特别注意到乌克兰的俄罗斯人。在他的研究中,Hnatiuk使用了现代多元文化研究的基本概念,如历史决定的东欧多元文化空间,它结合了国家和意识形态的异质性、文化扩散和社会同质性。然而,作者强调,Hnatiuk关注了种族文化边界的主导概念,民族学和心理现象的污染,民族身份的保存/丧失问题,多民族社会中的政治共识,民族意识的复调等等。通过对哈纳提乌克收集整理的乌戈尔罗斯(1897-1911)资料,研究了俄罗斯人对其他民族的多层次接待。在这一文化主题中,主要角色被分配给斯拉夫民族,他们更经常被认为是在和睦的层面上,而不是在群体内/群体外的二分法中保持距离。第二个层面是与非斯拉夫的欧洲国家(德国人、匈牙利人)的互动。然而,非欧洲的影响往往是形成东欧身份的一个因素:通过圣经书籍的犹太人的影响,以及来自土耳其袭击和奥斯曼帝国统治这些土地的中亚的影响。作者的结论是,多元文化主义方法论扩展了民族学研究的地理文化语境。经过加工的材料令人信服地证明,它可以适用于欧洲以前时代的文化和历史话语,这些话语包含了这一理论所提供的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the multiculturalism of Eastern Europe in the folklore and ethnographic works of Volodymyr Hnatiuk about the Ugrian Rusins
According to the research, Academician Volodymyr Hnatiuk's scholarly inquiry had focused on the elements of multiculturalism long before the theory of multiculturalism was developed. Hnatiuk studied the problems of coexistence of different ethnic groups in the multicultural realm of the Eastern European area, with a partucLuar attention to the Ugrian Rusins. In his research, Hnatiuk employed basic concepts for modern multicultural studies, such as historically determined multicultural space of Eastern Europe, which combines national and ideological heterogeneity, cultural diffusion and social homogeneity. Yet the authors emphasize that Hnatiuk paid attention to the dominant concepts of ethnocultural frontiers, the contamination of ethnological and psychomental phenomena, the problems of preservation/Loss of the national identity, the political consensus in a poLyethnic society, the polyphony of national consciousness, and others. The multilevel reception of other ethnic groups by the Rusins is studied on the Materials from Ugric Rus (1897-1911) collected and processed by Hnatiuk. The primary role in this cultural topos is assigned to the Slavic nations, who are more often perceived in the plane of rapprochement rather than distance in the dichotomy of In-group/Out-group. The second level is interaction with non-Slavic European nations (Germans, Hungarians). However, the non-European influences were often a factor in the formation of Eastern European identity: the Jewish influence through the biblical books, as well as Central Asian influences from the Turkish attacks and the Ottoman rule in these lands. The authors conclude that the muLticuLturaList methodology expands the geocuLturaL context of ethnological research. The processed material convincingly proves that it can be applied to the European cultural and historical discourses of previous epochs, which contain the features provided by this theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rusin
Rusin HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
75.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vitaliy (Maksimenko) and his efforts to create the Pochaiv Bank Elections to the Ukrainian Constituent Assembly (December 1917 - January 1918): campaign progress, lists of candidates, and voting results by districts The church underground in Moldova in 1944-1964: emergence, shapes, participants The Hutsul Springtime of Nations by Kajetan Abgarowicz: the discourse of the borderland as a state of culture awareness The dialect basis of Mykhailo Atamanyuk’s translation of the German-language Ein Kampf um’s Recht by K.E. Franzos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1