俄罗斯人和中国人的种族和性别刻板印象

Q3 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-85-95
E. Erofeeva, Yao Chen
{"title":"俄罗斯人和中国人的种族和性别刻板印象","authors":"E. Erofeeva, Yao Chen","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-85-95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers variation of social stereotypes within four ethnic-gender groups: Chinese males, Chinese females, Russian males, Russian females. The authors carried out the study as a cross-group experiment using the semantic differential method. The participants (30 pers. in each group, 120 pers. in total) evaluated the attributes of appearance, character and intellect of each group considered. The data analysis showed complex interaction between the ethnic and gender factors: the ethnic factor is more important for the Chinese subjects (both males and females), while the gender factor is the leading one for the Russian females. The types of attributes that are stereotypically referred to different groups and are preferably used by different groups also vary. Thus, appearance attributes are mostly used for describing females; the Chinese participants evaluate ethnic-gender groups using the character and appearance attributes; the Russian females evaluate ethnic-gender groups using the intellect attributes. Chinese and Russian females, both as an evaluating subject and an object of evaluation, are more “stereotypical” (females evaluate other groups using a wider range of attributes, and stereotypes about females include more attributes than stereotypes about males). Males as an object of evaluation are less stereotyped than females and, at the same time, perceive social groups less stereotypically. Almost no stable stereotypes were revealed about the Russian males. Overall, the results indicate that in each particular case of social categorization attributing stereotype features to different groups is a complex cognitive process determined by a unique combination of various factors.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ETHNIC AND GENDER STEREOTYPES OF RUSSIAN AND CHINESE\",\"authors\":\"E. Erofeeva, Yao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-85-95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article considers variation of social stereotypes within four ethnic-gender groups: Chinese males, Chinese females, Russian males, Russian females. The authors carried out the study as a cross-group experiment using the semantic differential method. The participants (30 pers. in each group, 120 pers. in total) evaluated the attributes of appearance, character and intellect of each group considered. The data analysis showed complex interaction between the ethnic and gender factors: the ethnic factor is more important for the Chinese subjects (both males and females), while the gender factor is the leading one for the Russian females. The types of attributes that are stereotypically referred to different groups and are preferably used by different groups also vary. Thus, appearance attributes are mostly used for describing females; the Chinese participants evaluate ethnic-gender groups using the character and appearance attributes; the Russian females evaluate ethnic-gender groups using the intellect attributes. Chinese and Russian females, both as an evaluating subject and an object of evaluation, are more “stereotypical” (females evaluate other groups using a wider range of attributes, and stereotypes about females include more attributes than stereotypes about males). Males as an object of evaluation are less stereotyped than females and, at the same time, perceive social groups less stereotypically. Almost no stable stereotypes were revealed about the Russian males. Overall, the results indicate that in each particular case of social categorization attributing stereotype features to different groups is a complex cognitive process determined by a unique combination of various factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-85-95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-85-95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了中国男性、中国女性、俄罗斯男性、俄罗斯女性四个民族性别群体中社会刻板印象的变化。本文采用语义差分方法进行跨组实验。参与者每人30人。每组120人。总的来说)评估了每一组人的外貌、性格和智力。数据分析表明,民族因素和性别因素之间存在复杂的相互作用,民族因素对中国受试者(男性和女性)更为重要,而性别因素在俄罗斯女性中占主导地位。典型地引用不同组并优选由不同组使用的属性类型也各不相同。因此,外貌属性主要用于描述女性;中国被试用性格和外貌属性评价民族-性别群体;俄罗斯女性用智力属性评价少数民族-性别群体。中国和俄罗斯女性,无论是作为评价主体还是评价客体,都更加“刻板”(女性评价其他群体时使用的属性范围更广,对女性的刻板印象比对男性的刻板印象包含更多的属性)。作为评价对象的男性比女性更不刻板,同时,对社会群体的看法也不那么刻板。几乎没有发现关于俄罗斯男性的固定刻板印象。总体而言,研究结果表明,在社会分类的每个特定案例中,刻板印象特征归属于不同群体是一个复杂的认知过程,由多种因素的独特组合决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ETHNIC AND GENDER STEREOTYPES OF RUSSIAN AND CHINESE
The article considers variation of social stereotypes within four ethnic-gender groups: Chinese males, Chinese females, Russian males, Russian females. The authors carried out the study as a cross-group experiment using the semantic differential method. The participants (30 pers. in each group, 120 pers. in total) evaluated the attributes of appearance, character and intellect of each group considered. The data analysis showed complex interaction between the ethnic and gender factors: the ethnic factor is more important for the Chinese subjects (both males and females), while the gender factor is the leading one for the Russian females. The types of attributes that are stereotypically referred to different groups and are preferably used by different groups also vary. Thus, appearance attributes are mostly used for describing females; the Chinese participants evaluate ethnic-gender groups using the character and appearance attributes; the Russian females evaluate ethnic-gender groups using the intellect attributes. Chinese and Russian females, both as an evaluating subject and an object of evaluation, are more “stereotypical” (females evaluate other groups using a wider range of attributes, and stereotypes about females include more attributes than stereotypes about males). Males as an object of evaluation are less stereotyped than females and, at the same time, perceive social groups less stereotypically. Almost no stable stereotypes were revealed about the Russian males. Overall, the results indicate that in each particular case of social categorization attributing stereotype features to different groups is a complex cognitive process determined by a unique combination of various factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
DOMINANT PRINCIPLE IN LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF A DEVIANT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY TEXT COMPLEXITY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS COUNTERFACTUAL SOVIET PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH THE LENS OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH ART CRITICS: EVALUATIVE DIMENSIONS OF ART DISCOURSE PRECEDENCE IN PARADIGMATICS AND SYNTAGMATICS (on the example of comparisons in modern German)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1