中俄大学生俄语语篇理解认知风格的跨文化比较

Q3 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-122-133
Ma Xiangfei, E. Seliverstova, L. Volkova
{"title":"中俄大学生俄语语篇理解认知风格的跨文化比较","authors":"Ma Xiangfei, E. Seliverstova, L. Volkova","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-122-133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to explore the similarities and differences between Russian and Chinese students in their reading comprehension of a Russian-language text as well as in the cognitive strategies used to grasp the contents. The experiment involved 44 Chinese and 30 Russian university students, who were asked to read a text and create questions about it, which provided diagnostic markers of their cognitive styles. The cognitive strategies used by the students were evaluated as analytic / synthetic and abstract / concrete. The statistic processing revealed that the Chinese students tend to rely on the surface structures of the text, to focus on details and to think figuratively. By contrast, the Russian respondents are more likely to rely on the macrostructures of the text, its logic and composition. The results suggest that the cognitive strategies of reading comprehension are influenced by the national practice of teaching reading and culture-related attitudes.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE STYLES USED BY CHINESE AND RUSSIAN UNDERGRADUATES IN COMPREHENSION OF RUSSIAN TEXTS\",\"authors\":\"Ma Xiangfei, E. Seliverstova, L. Volkova\",\"doi\":\"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-122-133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to explore the similarities and differences between Russian and Chinese students in their reading comprehension of a Russian-language text as well as in the cognitive strategies used to grasp the contents. The experiment involved 44 Chinese and 30 Russian university students, who were asked to read a text and create questions about it, which provided diagnostic markers of their cognitive styles. The cognitive strategies used by the students were evaluated as analytic / synthetic and abstract / concrete. The statistic processing revealed that the Chinese students tend to rely on the surface structures of the text, to focus on details and to think figuratively. By contrast, the Russian respondents are more likely to rely on the macrostructures of the text, its logic and composition. The results suggest that the cognitive strategies of reading comprehension are influenced by the national practice of teaching reading and culture-related attitudes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-122-133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-122-133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是探讨中俄学生在俄语文本阅读理解和理解内容的认知策略上的异同。这项实验涉及了44名中国大学生和30名俄罗斯大学生,他们被要求阅读一篇文章并提出问题,这些问题为他们的认知风格提供了诊断标记。学生使用的认知策略分为分析/综合和抽象/具体。统计处理表明,中国学生倾向于依赖文本的表面结构,注重细节和形象思维。相比之下,俄罗斯受访者更倾向于依赖文本的宏观结构、逻辑和构成。结果表明,阅读理解的认知策略受到国家阅读教学实践和文化相关态度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE STYLES USED BY CHINESE AND RUSSIAN UNDERGRADUATES IN COMPREHENSION OF RUSSIAN TEXTS
The purpose of this paper is to explore the similarities and differences between Russian and Chinese students in their reading comprehension of a Russian-language text as well as in the cognitive strategies used to grasp the contents. The experiment involved 44 Chinese and 30 Russian university students, who were asked to read a text and create questions about it, which provided diagnostic markers of their cognitive styles. The cognitive strategies used by the students were evaluated as analytic / synthetic and abstract / concrete. The statistic processing revealed that the Chinese students tend to rely on the surface structures of the text, to focus on details and to think figuratively. By contrast, the Russian respondents are more likely to rely on the macrostructures of the text, its logic and composition. The results suggest that the cognitive strategies of reading comprehension are influenced by the national practice of teaching reading and culture-related attitudes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
DOMINANT PRINCIPLE IN LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF A DEVIANT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY TEXT COMPLEXITY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS COUNTERFACTUAL SOVIET PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH THE LENS OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH ART CRITICS: EVALUATIVE DIMENSIONS OF ART DISCOURSE PRECEDENCE IN PARADIGMATICS AND SYNTAGMATICS (on the example of comparisons in modern German)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1