{"title":"俄语和英语学术话语教学策略","authors":"L. Enbaeva","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-125-133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper addresses the issue of instruction strategy employment in the academic discourse from the viewpoint of cognitive-discursive paradigm. The aim of the paper is to reveal discursive tactics actualizing the instruction strategy in Chemistry textbooks and compare them cross-culturally. Comparison of Russian and English Chemistry textbooks was conducted to draw a sample of discourse moves that aim to develop cognitive skills; they were analysed in order to structure the received sample. The comparative analysis resulted in the proposal of a classification of instruction tactics in accordance with the expected learning outcomes. It comprises two types of instruction tactics: subject-specific and meta-subject. The paper highlights a few differences in the application of instruction tactics in Russian and English Chemistry textbooks. The differences involve variation of verbal expression and position characteristics as well as functional differences. One possible application of research results might be connected with enhancing textbook writer’s awareness of instruction strategy and tactics employment with the view of expected learning outcomes. The proposed classification could be applied in teaching materials design. In summary, cross-cultural comparison of textbooks can be beneficial to our further understanding of academic discourse and cognitive development.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INSTRUCTION STRATEGY IN RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH ACADEMIC DISCOURSE\",\"authors\":\"L. Enbaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-125-133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper addresses the issue of instruction strategy employment in the academic discourse from the viewpoint of cognitive-discursive paradigm. The aim of the paper is to reveal discursive tactics actualizing the instruction strategy in Chemistry textbooks and compare them cross-culturally. Comparison of Russian and English Chemistry textbooks was conducted to draw a sample of discourse moves that aim to develop cognitive skills; they were analysed in order to structure the received sample. The comparative analysis resulted in the proposal of a classification of instruction tactics in accordance with the expected learning outcomes. It comprises two types of instruction tactics: subject-specific and meta-subject. The paper highlights a few differences in the application of instruction tactics in Russian and English Chemistry textbooks. The differences involve variation of verbal expression and position characteristics as well as functional differences. One possible application of research results might be connected with enhancing textbook writer’s awareness of instruction strategy and tactics employment with the view of expected learning outcomes. The proposed classification could be applied in teaching materials design. In summary, cross-cultural comparison of textbooks can be beneficial to our further understanding of academic discourse and cognitive development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-125-133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-125-133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
INSTRUCTION STRATEGY IN RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH ACADEMIC DISCOURSE
The paper addresses the issue of instruction strategy employment in the academic discourse from the viewpoint of cognitive-discursive paradigm. The aim of the paper is to reveal discursive tactics actualizing the instruction strategy in Chemistry textbooks and compare them cross-culturally. Comparison of Russian and English Chemistry textbooks was conducted to draw a sample of discourse moves that aim to develop cognitive skills; they were analysed in order to structure the received sample. The comparative analysis resulted in the proposal of a classification of instruction tactics in accordance with the expected learning outcomes. It comprises two types of instruction tactics: subject-specific and meta-subject. The paper highlights a few differences in the application of instruction tactics in Russian and English Chemistry textbooks. The differences involve variation of verbal expression and position characteristics as well as functional differences. One possible application of research results might be connected with enhancing textbook writer’s awareness of instruction strategy and tactics employment with the view of expected learning outcomes. The proposed classification could be applied in teaching materials design. In summary, cross-cultural comparison of textbooks can be beneficial to our further understanding of academic discourse and cognitive development.
期刊介绍:
Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.