由句法前景介导的一、二语言新隐喻识别:眼动研究

Q3 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-83-91
A. Rzheshevskaya, A. Izmalkova
{"title":"由句法前景介导的一、二语言新隐喻识别:眼动研究","authors":"A. Rzheshevskaya, A. Izmalkova","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-83-91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study explores gaze behavior in novel metaphor recognition in L1 and L2 as affected by the syntactic position of a metaphor; therefore, we test the contrastive role of syntactic foregrounding in information processing. Following cognitive linguistic theories of foregrounding [Talmy 2000; Iriskhanova 2014], we expect its effects on both gaze behavior and metaphor recognition in subject and predicate positions. Following the theories exploring the role of cognitive mechanisms of analogical reasoning and associative fluency [Gentner & Bowdler 2008; Holyoak & Stamenković 2020] in L1 and L2 [Littlemore et al. 2011, Heredia and Cieślicka 2016], we expect differences in L1 and L2 participants in reading and recognition of novel metaphors. The results show that novel metaphor recognition in less foregrounded syntactic position is better in both L1 and L2, which might be explained by the fact that in syntactically foregrounded positions the participants were more likely to search for the source of metaphor, rather than for its target. Additionally, we revealed significant differences in L1 and L2 gaze performance in mean fixation duration, which is higher in syntactically foregrounded position for L2, which might be explained by higher effects of syntactic foregrounding in L2.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NOVEL METAPHOR RECOGNITION IN L1 AND L2 AS MEDIATED BY SYNTACTIC FOREGROUNDING: AN EYE MOVEMENT STUDY\",\"authors\":\"A. Rzheshevskaya, A. Izmalkova\",\"doi\":\"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-83-91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study explores gaze behavior in novel metaphor recognition in L1 and L2 as affected by the syntactic position of a metaphor; therefore, we test the contrastive role of syntactic foregrounding in information processing. Following cognitive linguistic theories of foregrounding [Talmy 2000; Iriskhanova 2014], we expect its effects on both gaze behavior and metaphor recognition in subject and predicate positions. Following the theories exploring the role of cognitive mechanisms of analogical reasoning and associative fluency [Gentner & Bowdler 2008; Holyoak & Stamenković 2020] in L1 and L2 [Littlemore et al. 2011, Heredia and Cieślicka 2016], we expect differences in L1 and L2 participants in reading and recognition of novel metaphors. The results show that novel metaphor recognition in less foregrounded syntactic position is better in both L1 and L2, which might be explained by the fact that in syntactically foregrounded positions the participants were more likely to search for the source of metaphor, rather than for its target. Additionally, we revealed significant differences in L1 and L2 gaze performance in mean fixation duration, which is higher in syntactically foregrounded position for L2, which might be explained by higher effects of syntactic foregrounding in L2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-83-91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-83-91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了注视行为在第一语言和第二语言中新隐喻识别中的作用,它受隐喻句法位置的影响;因此,我们测试了句法前景在信息加工中的对比作用。认知语言学前景理论[Talmy 2000;Iriskhanova 2014],我们期望它对注视行为和主谓位置隐喻识别的影响。遵循理论探索类比推理和联想流畅的认知机制的作用[genner & Bowdler 2008;Holyoak & stamenkovic 2020]在母语和第二语言中[Littlemore et al. 2011, Heredia and Cieślicka 2016],我们预计母语和第二语言参与者在阅读和识别新隐喻方面存在差异。结果表明,在不太突出的句法位置上,第一语言和第二语言的新隐喻识别效果都较好,这可能是由于在句法突出的位置上,参与者更倾向于寻找隐喻的来源,而不是隐喻的目标。此外,我们发现L2和L1注视表现在平均注视时间上存在显著差异,其中L2注视在句法前景位置上的注视表现更高,这可能与L2注视在句法前景位置上的效果更高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NOVEL METAPHOR RECOGNITION IN L1 AND L2 AS MEDIATED BY SYNTACTIC FOREGROUNDING: AN EYE MOVEMENT STUDY
The study explores gaze behavior in novel metaphor recognition in L1 and L2 as affected by the syntactic position of a metaphor; therefore, we test the contrastive role of syntactic foregrounding in information processing. Following cognitive linguistic theories of foregrounding [Talmy 2000; Iriskhanova 2014], we expect its effects on both gaze behavior and metaphor recognition in subject and predicate positions. Following the theories exploring the role of cognitive mechanisms of analogical reasoning and associative fluency [Gentner & Bowdler 2008; Holyoak & Stamenković 2020] in L1 and L2 [Littlemore et al. 2011, Heredia and Cieślicka 2016], we expect differences in L1 and L2 participants in reading and recognition of novel metaphors. The results show that novel metaphor recognition in less foregrounded syntactic position is better in both L1 and L2, which might be explained by the fact that in syntactically foregrounded positions the participants were more likely to search for the source of metaphor, rather than for its target. Additionally, we revealed significant differences in L1 and L2 gaze performance in mean fixation duration, which is higher in syntactically foregrounded position for L2, which might be explained by higher effects of syntactic foregrounding in L2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
DOMINANT PRINCIPLE IN LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF A DEVIANT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY TEXT COMPLEXITY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS COUNTERFACTUAL SOVIET PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH THE LENS OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH ART CRITICS: EVALUATIVE DIMENSIONS OF ART DISCOURSE PRECEDENCE IN PARADIGMATICS AND SYNTAGMATICS (on the example of comparisons in modern German)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1