{"title":"叙事与话语","authors":"V. Demyankov","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-5-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ideas of “knowing” and of “being known” are traditionally ascribed to the Latin ‘gnārus’, the commonly recognized etymological source of the Latin ‘nārrō’ which normally meant “I am telling”. A prototypical narrative’s main property is cohesion, because narratives typically present chains of events and/or describe states of affairs which are not invented on the spot: prototypically, the narrator already ‘knows’ and the audience ‘learns’ them from the narration. At the same time, a prototypical discourse is coherent, consistently proving or disproving a certain line of ‘discursive’ thinking. Narrative discourses have both properties. A corpus investigation of the word ‘narrative’ and of its cognates and derivatives is here exposed, in several Romance languages (Latin, French, Italian, Spanish), in Germanic (English and German) and in Russian. It shows different tendencies of development of the meaning ‘narrative’ in the course of several centuries. There are three groups of languages, depending on which the lexeme statistically prevails in the corpus: verb-oriented Latin and Italian, narration-oriented French and Spanish, and narrative-oriented English, German, and Russian. Therefore, a critical look is necessary at the existing definitions of the terms ‘narrative’ and ‘discourse’, thus narrowing their semantic scopes and delimiting them from each other.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NARRATIVE AND DISCOURSE\",\"authors\":\"V. Demyankov\",\"doi\":\"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-5-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ideas of “knowing” and of “being known” are traditionally ascribed to the Latin ‘gnārus’, the commonly recognized etymological source of the Latin ‘nārrō’ which normally meant “I am telling”. A prototypical narrative’s main property is cohesion, because narratives typically present chains of events and/or describe states of affairs which are not invented on the spot: prototypically, the narrator already ‘knows’ and the audience ‘learns’ them from the narration. At the same time, a prototypical discourse is coherent, consistently proving or disproving a certain line of ‘discursive’ thinking. Narrative discourses have both properties. A corpus investigation of the word ‘narrative’ and of its cognates and derivatives is here exposed, in several Romance languages (Latin, French, Italian, Spanish), in Germanic (English and German) and in Russian. It shows different tendencies of development of the meaning ‘narrative’ in the course of several centuries. There are three groups of languages, depending on which the lexeme statistically prevails in the corpus: verb-oriented Latin and Italian, narration-oriented French and Spanish, and narrative-oriented English, German, and Russian. Therefore, a critical look is necessary at the existing definitions of the terms ‘narrative’ and ‘discourse’, thus narrowing their semantic scopes and delimiting them from each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-5-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-5-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ideas of “knowing” and of “being known” are traditionally ascribed to the Latin ‘gnārus’, the commonly recognized etymological source of the Latin ‘nārrō’ which normally meant “I am telling”. A prototypical narrative’s main property is cohesion, because narratives typically present chains of events and/or describe states of affairs which are not invented on the spot: prototypically, the narrator already ‘knows’ and the audience ‘learns’ them from the narration. At the same time, a prototypical discourse is coherent, consistently proving or disproving a certain line of ‘discursive’ thinking. Narrative discourses have both properties. A corpus investigation of the word ‘narrative’ and of its cognates and derivatives is here exposed, in several Romance languages (Latin, French, Italian, Spanish), in Germanic (English and German) and in Russian. It shows different tendencies of development of the meaning ‘narrative’ in the course of several centuries. There are three groups of languages, depending on which the lexeme statistically prevails in the corpus: verb-oriented Latin and Italian, narration-oriented French and Spanish, and narrative-oriented English, German, and Russian. Therefore, a critical look is necessary at the existing definitions of the terms ‘narrative’ and ‘discourse’, thus narrowing their semantic scopes and delimiting them from each other.
期刊介绍:
Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.