弥合团队教练能力差距:文献综述

IF 0.9 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.24384/Z9ZB-HJ74
L. Widdowson, L. Rochester, P. Barbour, A. Hullinger
{"title":"弥合团队教练能力差距:文献综述","authors":"L. Widdowson, L. Rochester, P. Barbour, A. Hullinger","doi":"10.24384/Z9ZB-HJ74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary purpose of this literature review was to provide a comprehensive background for understanding current knowledge, to highlight the significance of new research and to offer a new perspective. A synthesis approach has been used, combining a narrative review and an integrative review. Narrative reviews can inspire research ideas by identifying gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge, thus helping researchers to determine research questions or formulate hypotheses. Integrative reviews are intended to address emerging topics to create initial conceptualizations. This review indicates that the limited team coaching research to date has focused on defining the term, identifying effectiveness factors and investigating the efficacy of team coaching. While each of these areas require further research for team coaching to move beyond its pre-theory status, it would appear that research and theoretical framing for team coaching competencies is even further behind.","PeriodicalId":44889,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","volume":"18 1","pages":"35-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Team Coaching Competency Gap: A review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"L. Widdowson, L. Rochester, P. Barbour, A. Hullinger\",\"doi\":\"10.24384/Z9ZB-HJ74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary purpose of this literature review was to provide a comprehensive background for understanding current knowledge, to highlight the significance of new research and to offer a new perspective. A synthesis approach has been used, combining a narrative review and an integrative review. Narrative reviews can inspire research ideas by identifying gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge, thus helping researchers to determine research questions or formulate hypotheses. Integrative reviews are intended to address emerging topics to create initial conceptualizations. This review indicates that the limited team coaching research to date has focused on defining the term, identifying effectiveness factors and investigating the efficacy of team coaching. While each of these areas require further research for team coaching to move beyond its pre-theory status, it would appear that research and theoretical framing for team coaching competencies is even further behind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"35-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24384/Z9ZB-HJ74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24384/Z9ZB-HJ74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文献综述的主要目的是为理解现有知识提供一个全面的背景,突出新研究的意义,并提供一个新的视角。本文采用了一种综合的方法,将叙述性综述与综合性综述相结合。叙述性综述可以通过识别知识体系中的空白或不一致来激发研究思路,从而帮助研究人员确定研究问题或制定假设。综合评论的目的是解决新出现的主题,以建立初步的概念。研究发现,目前有限的团队教练研究主要集中在定义团队教练的术语、识别团队教练的有效性因素和调查团队教练的有效性。虽然这些领域中的每一个都需要进一步的研究,以使团队教练超越其理论前的状态,但似乎团队教练能力的研究和理论框架更加落后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging the Team Coaching Competency Gap: A review of the literature
The primary purpose of this literature review was to provide a comprehensive background for understanding current knowledge, to highlight the significance of new research and to offer a new perspective. A synthesis approach has been used, combining a narrative review and an integrative review. Narrative reviews can inspire research ideas by identifying gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge, thus helping researchers to determine research questions or formulate hypotheses. Integrative reviews are intended to address emerging topics to create initial conceptualizations. This review indicates that the limited team coaching research to date has focused on defining the term, identifying effectiveness factors and investigating the efficacy of team coaching. While each of these areas require further research for team coaching to move beyond its pre-theory status, it would appear that research and theoretical framing for team coaching competencies is even further behind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
How have workplace coaches experienced coaching during the Covid-19 pandemic? A Parallel Journey: The varied roles of coaching in an elite athlete's transition to a second career The role of courage in the development and practice of coaches Understanding the coaching experiences of non-traditional students in Higher Education in the UK A Qualitative Evaluation of SMU’s Peer Helpers Programme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1