HADDING用法中的意图陈述:EBI'D-DEM和TEXIKU'L-

Yusuf Acar
{"title":"HADDING用法中的意图陈述:EBI'D-DEM和TEXIKU'L-","authors":"Yusuf Acar","doi":"10.33415/daad.1041161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the relevance of Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah of Ibn Abi’l-Dam (d. 642/1244), whose name is mentioned in the context of objection to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ (d. 643/1245) although not very often, to Muqaddimah Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ is discussed. Based on Şams al-Din al-Sakhāwī’s (d. 902/1497) claim that Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah is plagiarism and the book’s critical edition committee being of the same opinion, it is tried to determine the relationship between the two works by reading them comparatively. It is very remarkable that there was a study on Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ’s work while he was still alive, and that it contained plagiarism. The main objective of this research is to reveal the dimensions and nature of plagiarism in Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah in terms of form, method and content. In the meantime, the paper will draw researchers attention to some of the original aspects of the work in question and to some criticisms of its author against Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ.","PeriodicalId":41749,"journal":{"name":"Dinbilimleri Akademik Arastirma Dergisi-Journal of Academic Research in Religious Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HADİS USULÜNDE BİR İNTİHAL VAKASI: İBN EBİ’D-DEM VE TEDKÎKU’L-ʿİNÂYE ADLI ESERİ\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Acar\",\"doi\":\"10.33415/daad.1041161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the relevance of Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah of Ibn Abi’l-Dam (d. 642/1244), whose name is mentioned in the context of objection to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ (d. 643/1245) although not very often, to Muqaddimah Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ is discussed. Based on Şams al-Din al-Sakhāwī’s (d. 902/1497) claim that Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah is plagiarism and the book’s critical edition committee being of the same opinion, it is tried to determine the relationship between the two works by reading them comparatively. It is very remarkable that there was a study on Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ’s work while he was still alive, and that it contained plagiarism. The main objective of this research is to reveal the dimensions and nature of plagiarism in Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah in terms of form, method and content. In the meantime, the paper will draw researchers attention to some of the original aspects of the work in question and to some criticisms of its author against Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dinbilimleri Akademik Arastirma Dergisi-Journal of Academic Research in Religious Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dinbilimleri Akademik Arastirma Dergisi-Journal of Academic Research in Religious Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33415/daad.1041161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dinbilimleri Akademik Arastirma Dergisi-Journal of Academic Research in Religious Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33415/daad.1041161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了Ibn Abi ' l- dam (d. 642/1244)的tadq . q al- ' Ināyah与Muqaddimah Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ的相关性,尽管在反对Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ (d. 643/1245)的背景下不经常提到他的名字。基于Şams al- din al-Sakhāwī (d. 902/1497)关于《tadq.q q al- ' Ināyah》是抄袭的主张,以及该书的批评编辑委员会的一致意见,试图通过比较阅读来确定两部作品之间的关系。值得注意的是,在伊本·阿尔·-Ṣalāḥ在世的时候,就有人对他的作品进行了研究,而且其中有抄袭的成分。本研究的主要目的是从形式、方法和内容三个方面揭示tadq ? q al- ' Ināyah抄袭的维度和性质。与此同时,这篇论文将吸引研究人员注意到这项工作的一些原始方面,以及作者对Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ的一些批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HADİS USULÜNDE BİR İNTİHAL VAKASI: İBN EBİ’D-DEM VE TEDKÎKU’L-ʿİNÂYE ADLI ESERİ
In this article, the relevance of Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah of Ibn Abi’l-Dam (d. 642/1244), whose name is mentioned in the context of objection to Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ (d. 643/1245) although not very often, to Muqaddimah Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ is discussed. Based on Şams al-Din al-Sakhāwī’s (d. 902/1497) claim that Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah is plagiarism and the book’s critical edition committee being of the same opinion, it is tried to determine the relationship between the two works by reading them comparatively. It is very remarkable that there was a study on Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ’s work while he was still alive, and that it contained plagiarism. The main objective of this research is to reveal the dimensions and nature of plagiarism in Tadqīq al-‘Ināyah in terms of form, method and content. In the meantime, the paper will draw researchers attention to some of the original aspects of the work in question and to some criticisms of its author against Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
التفسيرات التربوية للأمر بالقراءة في العصر الكلاسيكي للإسلام تحول الدين المدني الأمريكي من الدين الثقافي المدني إلى الدين السياسي المدني HUTBENİN YAYGIN DİN EĞİTİMİ AMAÇLARINA ERİŞİM DÜZEYİ ÖLÇEĞİ: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI AHLÂK EĞİTİMİNDE KULLANILAN HÜLÂSA-İ MEKÂRİM-İ AHLÂK’TAKİ SORU CEVAP TEKNİĞİNİN ANALİZİ Liberal Theology and the Rise of Qur’an as An Academic Text in Modern Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1