基于先进平衡优化和粒子群优化的燃料电池对电网电压暂降的影响

IF 0.7 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Jordan Journal of Electrical Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5455/jjee.204-1669996684
M. Khaleel, Z. Yusupov, M. Guneser, Tahir Ghandoori, A. Abulifa, A. Ahmed, Abdulgader Alsharif
{"title":"基于先进平衡优化和粒子群优化的燃料电池对电网电压暂降的影响","authors":"M. Khaleel, Z. Yusupov, M. Guneser, Tahir Ghandoori, A. Abulifa, A. Ahmed, Abdulgader Alsharif","doi":"10.5455/jjee.204-1669996684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integration of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) with electrical power grid (EPG) can improve the power quality (PQ) of EPG by injecting the required power. However, this makes the PQ issue more complicated due to the negative impact of voltage sag on EPG. Unfortunately, the classical P-I controllers fail in eliminating the voltage sag. In this context, this paper, attempts to mitigate the voltage sag in an interconnected PEMFC-EPG system by utilizing advanced equilibrium optimizer (AEO) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) controllers, and their efficiency is demonstrated by comparison with conventional P-I controllers. To achieve this goal, the AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC are employed in the EPG line with different fault scenarios. The obtained results unveil that both AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC provide the needed boost of voltage in the single line-to-ground faults (SLGF) scenario by 100.00%. For double line-to-ground faults (DLGF) scenario, a voltage boost of 99.56% and 98.39% is achieved while a voltage boost of 98.50% and 97.45% for the three line-to-ground faults (TLGF) scenario is obtained by the AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC, respectively.","PeriodicalId":29729,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Electrical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Fuel Cells on Voltage Sag Mitigation in Power Grids Using Advanced Equilibrium Optimizer and Particle Swarm Optimization\",\"authors\":\"M. Khaleel, Z. Yusupov, M. Guneser, Tahir Ghandoori, A. Abulifa, A. Ahmed, Abdulgader Alsharif\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/jjee.204-1669996684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Integration of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) with electrical power grid (EPG) can improve the power quality (PQ) of EPG by injecting the required power. However, this makes the PQ issue more complicated due to the negative impact of voltage sag on EPG. Unfortunately, the classical P-I controllers fail in eliminating the voltage sag. In this context, this paper, attempts to mitigate the voltage sag in an interconnected PEMFC-EPG system by utilizing advanced equilibrium optimizer (AEO) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) controllers, and their efficiency is demonstrated by comparison with conventional P-I controllers. To achieve this goal, the AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC are employed in the EPG line with different fault scenarios. The obtained results unveil that both AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC provide the needed boost of voltage in the single line-to-ground faults (SLGF) scenario by 100.00%. For double line-to-ground faults (DLGF) scenario, a voltage boost of 99.56% and 98.39% is achieved while a voltage boost of 98.50% and 97.45% for the three line-to-ground faults (TLGF) scenario is obtained by the AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Journal of Electrical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Journal of Electrical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/jjee.204-1669996684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jjee.204-1669996684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

质子交换膜燃料电池(PEMFC)与电网(EPG)的集成可以通过注入所需的电能来改善EPG的电能质量(PQ)。然而,由于电压骤降对EPG的负面影响,这使得PQ问题变得更加复杂。不幸的是,经典的P-I控制器无法消除电压凹陷。在此背景下,本文尝试利用先进的平衡优化器(AEO)和粒子群优化(PSO)控制器来缓解互联PEMFC-EPG系统中的电压暂降,并通过与传统的P-I控制器的比较证明了它们的效率。为了实现这一目标,在不同故障场景的EPG线路中采用了AEO-PEMFC和PSO-PEMFC。获得的结果表明,AEO-PEMFC和PSO-PEMFC在单线对地故障(SLGF)场景中提供所需的电压提升100.00%。对于双线路对地故障(DLGF), AEO-PEMFC和PSO-PEMFC分别获得了99.56%和98.39%的升压,而对于三线路对地故障(TLGF), AEO-PEMFC和PSO-PEMFC分别获得了98.50%和97.45%的升压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Fuel Cells on Voltage Sag Mitigation in Power Grids Using Advanced Equilibrium Optimizer and Particle Swarm Optimization
Integration of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) with electrical power grid (EPG) can improve the power quality (PQ) of EPG by injecting the required power. However, this makes the PQ issue more complicated due to the negative impact of voltage sag on EPG. Unfortunately, the classical P-I controllers fail in eliminating the voltage sag. In this context, this paper, attempts to mitigate the voltage sag in an interconnected PEMFC-EPG system by utilizing advanced equilibrium optimizer (AEO) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) controllers, and their efficiency is demonstrated by comparison with conventional P-I controllers. To achieve this goal, the AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC are employed in the EPG line with different fault scenarios. The obtained results unveil that both AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC provide the needed boost of voltage in the single line-to-ground faults (SLGF) scenario by 100.00%. For double line-to-ground faults (DLGF) scenario, a voltage boost of 99.56% and 98.39% is achieved while a voltage boost of 98.50% and 97.45% for the three line-to-ground faults (TLGF) scenario is obtained by the AEO-PEMFC and PSO-PEMFC, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Monitoring System for a Hybrid Photovoltaic-Diesel Power System: Web-Based SCADA Approach A Method of Colour-Histogram Matching for Nigerian Paper Currency Notes Classification. Energy-Efficient Cache Partitioning Using Machine Learning for Embedded Systems Effect of Fuel Cells on Voltage Sag Mitigation in Power Grids Using Advanced Equilibrium Optimizer and Particle Swarm Optimization Power Conditioner Design and Control for a Grid-Connected Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1