用甲基化模式估计全基因组DNA甲基化异质性。

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Epigenetics & Chromatin Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1186/s13072-023-00521-7
Pei-Yu Lin, Ya-Ting Chang, Yu-Chun Huang, Pao-Yang Chen
{"title":"用甲基化模式估计全基因组DNA甲基化异质性。","authors":"Pei-Yu Lin, Ya-Ting Chang, Yu-Chun Huang, Pao-Yang Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13072-023-00521-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a heterogeneous population of cells, individual cells can behave differently and respond variably to the environment. This cellular diversity can be assessed by measuring DNA methylation patterns. The loci with variable methylation patterns are informative of cellular heterogeneity and may serve as biomarkers of diseases and developmental progression. Cell-to-cell methylation heterogeneity can be evaluated through single-cell methylomes or computational techniques for pooled cells. However, the feasibility and performance of these approaches to precisely estimate methylation heterogeneity require further assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we proposed model-based methods adopted from a mathematical framework originally from biodiversity, to estimate genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity. We evaluated the performance of our models and the existing methods with feature comparison, and tested on both synthetic datasets and real data. Overall, our methods have demonstrated advantages over others because of their better correlation with the actual heterogeneity. We also demonstrated that methylation heterogeneity offers an additional layer of biological information distinct from the conventional methylation level. In the case studies, we showed that distinct profiles of methylation heterogeneity in CG and non-CG methylation can predict the regulatory roles between genomic elements in Arabidopsis. This opens up a new direction for plant epigenomics. Finally, we demonstrated that our score might be able to identify loci in human cancer samples as putative biomarkers for early cancer detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We adopted the mathematical framework from biodiversity into three model-based methods for analyzing genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity to monitor cellular heterogeneity. Our methods, namely MeH, have been implemented, evaluated with existing methods, and are open to the research community.</p>","PeriodicalId":49253,"journal":{"name":"Epigenetics & Chromatin","volume":"16 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity with methylation patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Yu Lin, Ya-Ting Chang, Yu-Chun Huang, Pao-Yang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13072-023-00521-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a heterogeneous population of cells, individual cells can behave differently and respond variably to the environment. This cellular diversity can be assessed by measuring DNA methylation patterns. The loci with variable methylation patterns are informative of cellular heterogeneity and may serve as biomarkers of diseases and developmental progression. Cell-to-cell methylation heterogeneity can be evaluated through single-cell methylomes or computational techniques for pooled cells. However, the feasibility and performance of these approaches to precisely estimate methylation heterogeneity require further assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we proposed model-based methods adopted from a mathematical framework originally from biodiversity, to estimate genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity. We evaluated the performance of our models and the existing methods with feature comparison, and tested on both synthetic datasets and real data. Overall, our methods have demonstrated advantages over others because of their better correlation with the actual heterogeneity. We also demonstrated that methylation heterogeneity offers an additional layer of biological information distinct from the conventional methylation level. In the case studies, we showed that distinct profiles of methylation heterogeneity in CG and non-CG methylation can predict the regulatory roles between genomic elements in Arabidopsis. This opens up a new direction for plant epigenomics. Finally, we demonstrated that our score might be able to identify loci in human cancer samples as putative biomarkers for early cancer detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We adopted the mathematical framework from biodiversity into three model-based methods for analyzing genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity to monitor cellular heterogeneity. Our methods, namely MeH, have been implemented, evaluated with existing methods, and are open to the research community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epigenetics & Chromatin\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epigenetics & Chromatin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-023-00521-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenetics & Chromatin","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-023-00521-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在异质性细胞群体中,单个细胞的行为可能不同,对环境的反应也不同。这种细胞多样性可以通过测量DNA甲基化模式来评估。具有可变甲基化模式的基因座是细胞异质性的信息来源,可以作为疾病和发育进展的生物标志物。细胞间甲基化异质性可以通过单细胞甲基化体或混合细胞的计算技术来评估。然而,这些方法精确估计甲基化异质性的可行性和性能需要进一步评估。结果:在这里,我们提出了基于模型的方法,采用了最初来自生物多样性的数学框架,来估计全基因组DNA甲基化的异质性。我们通过特征比较评估了我们的模型和现有方法的性能,并在合成数据集和真实数据上进行了测试。总的来说,我们的方法已经证明了优于其他方法的优势,因为它们与实际的异质性有更好的相关性。我们还证明,甲基化异质性提供了一层不同于传统甲基化水平的额外生物信息。在案例研究中,我们发现CG和非CG甲基化中甲基化异质性的不同特征可以预测拟南芥基因组元件之间的调节作用。这为植物表观基因组学开辟了一个新的方向。最后,我们证明了我们的评分可能能够识别人类癌症样本中的基因座,作为早期癌症检测的假定生物标志物。结论:我们将生物多样性的数学框架纳入了三种基于模型的方法中,用于分析全基因组DNA甲基化异质性,以监测细胞异质性。我们的方法,即MeH,已经实施,并用现有方法进行了评估,并向研究界开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity with methylation patterns.

Background: In a heterogeneous population of cells, individual cells can behave differently and respond variably to the environment. This cellular diversity can be assessed by measuring DNA methylation patterns. The loci with variable methylation patterns are informative of cellular heterogeneity and may serve as biomarkers of diseases and developmental progression. Cell-to-cell methylation heterogeneity can be evaluated through single-cell methylomes or computational techniques for pooled cells. However, the feasibility and performance of these approaches to precisely estimate methylation heterogeneity require further assessment.

Results: Here, we proposed model-based methods adopted from a mathematical framework originally from biodiversity, to estimate genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity. We evaluated the performance of our models and the existing methods with feature comparison, and tested on both synthetic datasets and real data. Overall, our methods have demonstrated advantages over others because of their better correlation with the actual heterogeneity. We also demonstrated that methylation heterogeneity offers an additional layer of biological information distinct from the conventional methylation level. In the case studies, we showed that distinct profiles of methylation heterogeneity in CG and non-CG methylation can predict the regulatory roles between genomic elements in Arabidopsis. This opens up a new direction for plant epigenomics. Finally, we demonstrated that our score might be able to identify loci in human cancer samples as putative biomarkers for early cancer detection.

Conclusions: We adopted the mathematical framework from biodiversity into three model-based methods for analyzing genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity to monitor cellular heterogeneity. Our methods, namely MeH, have been implemented, evaluated with existing methods, and are open to the research community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epigenetics & Chromatin
Epigenetics & Chromatin GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Epigenetics & Chromatin is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that publishes research, and reviews, providing novel insights into epigenetic inheritance and chromatin-based interactions. The journal aims to understand how gene and chromosomal elements are regulated and their activities maintained during processes such as cell division, differentiation and environmental alteration.
期刊最新文献
VprBP regulates osteoclast differentiation via an epigenetic mechanism involving histone H2A phosphorylation. FOSL1 is a key regulator of a super-enhancer driving TCOF1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer. Chromatin structure and 3D architecture define the differential functions of PU.1 regulatory elements in blood cell lineages. H3.3K122A results in a neomorphic phenotype in mouse embryonic stem cells. Epigenetic frontiers: miRNAs, long non-coding RNAs and nanomaterials are pioneering to cancer therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1