业务流程重新设计的方法:现状与发展前景

Thomas Hess, Hubert Oesterle
{"title":"业务流程重新设计的方法:现状与发展前景","authors":"Thomas Hess,&nbsp;Hubert Oesterle","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-0828(199604)3:2<73::AID-BCR61>3.0.CO;2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many companies regard restructuring their central processes as a means of strengthening their competitive position. The methods developed by research institutes and consultancy firms often display fundamental differences. As a result, many companies are unsure how they ought to proceed. This paper gives an overview of the methods currently available for designing business processes. Following an example comparing two of the methods, it then presents a criteria catalogue highlighting the most significant similarities and differences between the 12 methods under examination. It also sheds light on some crucial issues of method design.</p>","PeriodicalId":100208,"journal":{"name":"Business Change and Re-engineering","volume":"3 2","pages":"73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for Business Process Redesign: Current State and Development Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hess,&nbsp;Hubert Oesterle\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1099-0828(199604)3:2<73::AID-BCR61>3.0.CO;2-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many companies regard restructuring their central processes as a means of strengthening their competitive position. The methods developed by research institutes and consultancy firms often display fundamental differences. As a result, many companies are unsure how they ought to proceed. This paper gives an overview of the methods currently available for designing business processes. Following an example comparing two of the methods, it then presents a criteria catalogue highlighting the most significant similarities and differences between the 12 methods under examination. It also sheds light on some crucial issues of method design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Change and Re-engineering\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"73-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Change and Re-engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0828%28199604%293%3A2%3C73%3A%3AAID-BCR61%3E3.0.CO%3B2-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Change and Re-engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0828%28199604%293%3A2%3C73%3A%3AAID-BCR61%3E3.0.CO%3B2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

许多公司将重组其核心流程视为加强竞争地位的一种手段。研究机构和咨询公司开发的方法往往显示出根本的差异。因此,许多公司不确定应该如何进行。本文概述了目前可用于设计业务流程的方法。在比较两种方法的例子之后,它提出了一个标准目录,强调了所审查的12种方法之间最显著的相似性和差异。它还揭示了方法设计的一些关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods for Business Process Redesign: Current State and Development Perspectives

Many companies regard restructuring their central processes as a means of strengthening their competitive position. The methods developed by research institutes and consultancy firms often display fundamental differences. As a result, many companies are unsure how they ought to proceed. This paper gives an overview of the methods currently available for designing business processes. Following an example comparing two of the methods, it then presents a criteria catalogue highlighting the most significant similarities and differences between the 12 methods under examination. It also sheds light on some crucial issues of method design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Business Process Re-Engineering using Groupware: A Case Study Mike Tucker, Chairman of the Institute of BPR The Virtual Business: Creating the Effective Business Organization Business Process Re-engineering in Scotland: Survey and Comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1