塞尔维亚语和马其顿语中的阿尔巴尼亚语

R. N. Malja-Imami, Marija Popović
{"title":"塞尔维亚语和马其顿语中的阿尔巴尼亚语","authors":"R. N. Malja-Imami, Marija Popović","doi":"10.5937/npdunp2102085m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper gives a brief overview of the literature dedicated to Albanian-Slavic contacts, and then compares two approaches to Albanianisms in Serbian and Macedonian languages. One is by Safet Hodža (2001) and the other by Vanja Stanišić (1995). Their studies differ in several aspects. First, in the inventory of processed lexical items. Thus, Hodža analyzed a total of 447, and Stanisic about 300. Then, Hodža represented almost all types of words (313 nouns, 50 adjectives, 48 verbs, 15 adverbs, 9 words and 8 exclamations, 2 conjunctions and 2 onomatopoeias), while Stanišić analyzed 182 lexemes, mainly nouns and a small number of verbs from different areas of human life: cattle breeding and agriculture (36), farming (41), nature and relief (23), house and garden (8), family terminology (8), material culture and mental life (10), abstract concepts, verbs and expressions of psychophysical conditions (56). Stanišić also deals with the Albanian names that are mentioned in the Dečani Hrisovulja (Chrysovulje), but also with a large number of Slavs. Hodža etymologically deals with the words in a separate dictionary section, while Stanišić does that within five thematic groups. In separate chapters, Hodža gives an exhaustive classification according to thematic groups, according to geographical distribution and time of their taking over. Stanišić grouped the words wider, and within the processing of individual words, they are geographically located. The author of this paper also points to other Albanianisms noted by other researchers, but also cites a new inventory of lexemes used by the Serbs in south-western Serbia and Kosovo and Metohia: čuče, čučajka \"kukavica (coward) \", rumbulak and rumbulačka \"okrugao (round)\", šaradžija \"testeraš (sawyer)\" (from alb. sharrë \"testera (saw), šoša \"prorešetati (to sift)\", vapa \"žega, toplota (heat, warmth)\", uknačiti (se) \"uživati (to enjoy)\".","PeriodicalId":52770,"journal":{"name":"Naucne publikacije Drzavnog univerziteta u Novom Pazaru","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Albanisms in Serbian and Macedonian speeches\",\"authors\":\"R. N. Malja-Imami, Marija Popović\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/npdunp2102085m\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper gives a brief overview of the literature dedicated to Albanian-Slavic contacts, and then compares two approaches to Albanianisms in Serbian and Macedonian languages. One is by Safet Hodža (2001) and the other by Vanja Stanišić (1995). Their studies differ in several aspects. First, in the inventory of processed lexical items. Thus, Hodža analyzed a total of 447, and Stanisic about 300. Then, Hodža represented almost all types of words (313 nouns, 50 adjectives, 48 verbs, 15 adverbs, 9 words and 8 exclamations, 2 conjunctions and 2 onomatopoeias), while Stanišić analyzed 182 lexemes, mainly nouns and a small number of verbs from different areas of human life: cattle breeding and agriculture (36), farming (41), nature and relief (23), house and garden (8), family terminology (8), material culture and mental life (10), abstract concepts, verbs and expressions of psychophysical conditions (56). Stanišić also deals with the Albanian names that are mentioned in the Dečani Hrisovulja (Chrysovulje), but also with a large number of Slavs. Hodža etymologically deals with the words in a separate dictionary section, while Stanišić does that within five thematic groups. In separate chapters, Hodža gives an exhaustive classification according to thematic groups, according to geographical distribution and time of their taking over. Stanišić grouped the words wider, and within the processing of individual words, they are geographically located. The author of this paper also points to other Albanianisms noted by other researchers, but also cites a new inventory of lexemes used by the Serbs in south-western Serbia and Kosovo and Metohia: čuče, čučajka \\\"kukavica (coward) \\\", rumbulak and rumbulačka \\\"okrugao (round)\\\", šaradžija \\\"testeraš (sawyer)\\\" (from alb. sharrë \\\"testera (saw), šoša \\\"prorešetati (to sift)\\\", vapa \\\"žega, toplota (heat, warmth)\\\", uknačiti (se) \\\"uživati (to enjoy)\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":52770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naucne publikacije Drzavnog univerziteta u Novom Pazaru\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naucne publikacije Drzavnog univerziteta u Novom Pazaru\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/npdunp2102085m\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naucne publikacije Drzavnog univerziteta u Novom Pazaru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/npdunp2102085m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文简要概述了专门研究阿尔巴尼亚-斯拉夫接触的文献,然后比较了两种研究塞尔维亚语和马其顿语中阿尔巴尼亚语的方法。一个是Safet Hodža(2001),另一个是Vanja Stanišić(1995)。他们的研究在几个方面有所不同。首先,在盘点加工过的词汇项目。因此,Hodža分析了447个,Stanisic分析了300个。然后,Hodža代表了几乎所有类型的单词(313个名词,50个形容词,48个动词,15个副词,9个单词和8个感叹词,2个连词和2个拟声词),而Stanišić分析了182个词汇,主要是名词和少量动词,来自人类生活的不同领域:养牛与农业(36)、耕作(41)、自然与救济(23)、房屋与花园(8)、家庭术语(8)、物质文化与精神生活(10)、抽象概念、动词和心理物理状态的表达(56)。Stanišić也处理在de ani Hrisovulja (Chrysovulje)中提到的阿尔巴尼亚名字,但也涉及大量斯拉夫人。Hodža按词源学在单独的词典部分中处理单词,而Stanišić在五个主题组中处理单词。在单独的章节中,Hodža根据专题组、地理分布和它们接管的时间给出了详尽的分类。Stanišić将单词分组得更宽,并且在处理单个单词时,它们在地理上是有位置的。这篇论文的作者还指出了其他研究人员注意到的其他阿尔巴尼亚语,但也引用了塞尔维亚西南部、科索沃和梅托希亚的塞尔维亚人使用的新词汇清单: u u ajka“kukavica(懦夫)”, rumbulak和rumbulaka“okrugao(圆)”,šaradžija“testerasov(索耶)”(从铝青铜。Sharrë "testera (saw), šoša "prorešetati (to sift)", vapa "žega, topplota (heat,温情)",ukna iti (se)“uživati(享受)”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Albanisms in Serbian and Macedonian speeches
This paper gives a brief overview of the literature dedicated to Albanian-Slavic contacts, and then compares two approaches to Albanianisms in Serbian and Macedonian languages. One is by Safet Hodža (2001) and the other by Vanja Stanišić (1995). Their studies differ in several aspects. First, in the inventory of processed lexical items. Thus, Hodža analyzed a total of 447, and Stanisic about 300. Then, Hodža represented almost all types of words (313 nouns, 50 adjectives, 48 verbs, 15 adverbs, 9 words and 8 exclamations, 2 conjunctions and 2 onomatopoeias), while Stanišić analyzed 182 lexemes, mainly nouns and a small number of verbs from different areas of human life: cattle breeding and agriculture (36), farming (41), nature and relief (23), house and garden (8), family terminology (8), material culture and mental life (10), abstract concepts, verbs and expressions of psychophysical conditions (56). Stanišić also deals with the Albanian names that are mentioned in the Dečani Hrisovulja (Chrysovulje), but also with a large number of Slavs. Hodža etymologically deals with the words in a separate dictionary section, while Stanišić does that within five thematic groups. In separate chapters, Hodža gives an exhaustive classification according to thematic groups, according to geographical distribution and time of their taking over. Stanišić grouped the words wider, and within the processing of individual words, they are geographically located. The author of this paper also points to other Albanianisms noted by other researchers, but also cites a new inventory of lexemes used by the Serbs in south-western Serbia and Kosovo and Metohia: čuče, čučajka "kukavica (coward) ", rumbulak and rumbulačka "okrugao (round)", šaradžija "testeraš (sawyer)" (from alb. sharrë "testera (saw), šoša "prorešetati (to sift)", vapa "žega, toplota (heat, warmth)", uknačiti (se) "uživati (to enjoy)".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Albanisms in Serbian and Macedonian speeches The criminological aspects of juvenile delinquency The impact of digital transformation on the formulation of new corporate strategic directions Yeats's sensibilities, Leda, and ambiguities in Elena Ferrante's 'The Lost Daughter' Socrates' understanding of the task of philosophy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1