分析师的GAAP收益预测质量

Tax eJournal Pub Date : 2021-10-05 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3599616
Novia (Xi) Chen, Allison Koester
{"title":"分析师的GAAP收益预测质量","authors":"Novia (Xi) Chen, Allison Koester","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3599616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the quality of analysts’ GAAP earnings forecasts and consider implications for research that uses these forecasts as inputs. We first exploit a setting that allows for a clean identification of GAAP earnings forecast quality. We find that GAAP earnings forecasts generally fail to incorporate a known event with an estimable GAAP earnings impact, especially forecasts issued by analysts who lack GAAP forecasting effort. We also find that GAAP earnings forecasts are not a good proxy for investor expectations of GAAP earnings. Both findings in this setting cast doubt on the quality of GAAP earnings forecasts. We assess the implications of these findings for two research applications. Using data spanning 2004 to 2020, we find that the presence of GAAP earnings forecasts that lack forecasting effort affects research inferences regarding GAAP earnings response coefficients and the prevalence of managers’ meet-or-beat behavior. We illustrate two simple remedies to mitigate the adverse effects of low-quality GAAP earnings forecasts on research inferences.","PeriodicalId":22313,"journal":{"name":"Tax eJournal","volume":"282 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecast quality\",\"authors\":\"Novia (Xi) Chen, Allison Koester\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3599616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the quality of analysts’ GAAP earnings forecasts and consider implications for research that uses these forecasts as inputs. We first exploit a setting that allows for a clean identification of GAAP earnings forecast quality. We find that GAAP earnings forecasts generally fail to incorporate a known event with an estimable GAAP earnings impact, especially forecasts issued by analysts who lack GAAP forecasting effort. We also find that GAAP earnings forecasts are not a good proxy for investor expectations of GAAP earnings. Both findings in this setting cast doubt on the quality of GAAP earnings forecasts. We assess the implications of these findings for two research applications. Using data spanning 2004 to 2020, we find that the presence of GAAP earnings forecasts that lack forecasting effort affects research inferences regarding GAAP earnings response coefficients and the prevalence of managers’ meet-or-beat behavior. We illustrate two simple remedies to mitigate the adverse effects of low-quality GAAP earnings forecasts on research inferences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tax eJournal\",\"volume\":\"282 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tax eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3599616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3599616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们检查分析师的GAAP收益预测的质量,并考虑使用这些预测作为输入的研究的影响。我们首先利用了一个可以清晰识别GAAP收益预测质量的设置。我们发现,GAAP收益预测通常无法将具有可估计的GAAP收益影响的已知事件纳入其中,特别是由缺乏GAAP预测工作的分析师发布的预测。我们还发现,GAAP收益预测并不能很好地代表投资者对GAAP收益的预期。在这种情况下,这两项发现都让人对GAAP盈利预测的质量产生了怀疑。我们评估这些发现对两个研究应用的影响。利用2004年至2020年的数据,我们发现缺乏预测努力的GAAP盈余预测的存在影响了有关GAAP盈余反应系数的研究推论和管理者“不碰上就赢”行为的普遍程度。我们举例说明了两种简单的补救措施,以减轻低质量的GAAP收益预测对研究推论的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecast quality
We examine the quality of analysts’ GAAP earnings forecasts and consider implications for research that uses these forecasts as inputs. We first exploit a setting that allows for a clean identification of GAAP earnings forecast quality. We find that GAAP earnings forecasts generally fail to incorporate a known event with an estimable GAAP earnings impact, especially forecasts issued by analysts who lack GAAP forecasting effort. We also find that GAAP earnings forecasts are not a good proxy for investor expectations of GAAP earnings. Both findings in this setting cast doubt on the quality of GAAP earnings forecasts. We assess the implications of these findings for two research applications. Using data spanning 2004 to 2020, we find that the presence of GAAP earnings forecasts that lack forecasting effort affects research inferences regarding GAAP earnings response coefficients and the prevalence of managers’ meet-or-beat behavior. We illustrate two simple remedies to mitigate the adverse effects of low-quality GAAP earnings forecasts on research inferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Puzzles in International Tax Agreements Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecast quality Workplace Transformation and Its Tax Compliance Implications Consumption Taxes and Multinational Tax Planning in the Digital Age - Evidence from the European Service Sector Tax Avoidance and Equity Pricing: The Importance of Countries’ Legal Institutions and Disclosure Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1