企业报告研究报告的可持续质量报告

Nina Febriana Dosinta, Nur Fitriana Hamsyi, Juanda Astarani
{"title":"企业报告研究报告的可持续质量报告","authors":"Nina Febriana Dosinta, Nur Fitriana Hamsyi, Juanda Astarani","doi":"10.29259/ja.v16i2.15881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sustainability Reporting (SR) quality had questioned because there is no standard in preparing SR enforced by standard setters in Indonesia. The SR quality had anticipated by reviewing corporate reporting research. Therefore, this study investigates the quality of SR in corporate reporting research. This study uses a systematic literature review from 2007-2020 through articles based on selected databases. The results showed that the measurement of the SR quality had dominated by the use of codification from the Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI). The accountability of corporate reporting, especially SR, cannot only be reviewed through GRI. The quality of SR in corporate reporting research shows that the codification proposed by other researchers besides GRI can be an alternative as a form of corporate reporting accountability. SR quality as an indicator of accountability for the implementation of the company's sustainability activities. The sustainability reporting quality is not a goal, only a tool to assess the sustainability of activities that an entity has carried out.","PeriodicalId":30918,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KUALITAS SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING DALAM RISET PELAPORAN KORPORAT\",\"authors\":\"Nina Febriana Dosinta, Nur Fitriana Hamsyi, Juanda Astarani\",\"doi\":\"10.29259/ja.v16i2.15881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Sustainability Reporting (SR) quality had questioned because there is no standard in preparing SR enforced by standard setters in Indonesia. The SR quality had anticipated by reviewing corporate reporting research. Therefore, this study investigates the quality of SR in corporate reporting research. This study uses a systematic literature review from 2007-2020 through articles based on selected databases. The results showed that the measurement of the SR quality had dominated by the use of codification from the Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI). The accountability of corporate reporting, especially SR, cannot only be reviewed through GRI. The quality of SR in corporate reporting research shows that the codification proposed by other researchers besides GRI can be an alternative as a form of corporate reporting accountability. SR quality as an indicator of accountability for the implementation of the company's sustainability activities. The sustainability reporting quality is not a goal, only a tool to assess the sustainability of activities that an entity has carried out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29259/ja.v16i2.15881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29259/ja.v16i2.15881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

可持续发展报告(SR)的质量受到质疑,因为印度尼西亚的标准制定者没有制定可持续发展报告的标准。社会责任的质量是通过回顾公司报告研究而预期的。因此,本研究在公司报告研究中考察社会责任的质量。本研究基于选定的数据库,对2007-2020年的文章进行了系统的文献综述。结果表明,SR质量的测量主要是使用全球报告倡议组织(GRI)的编纂。企业报告的问责性,特别是社会责任,不能只通过GRI来审查。公司报告研究中的社会责任质量表明,除了GRI之外,其他研究人员提出的编纂可以作为公司报告问责制的一种替代形式。社会责任质量作为公司可持续发展活动实施的责任指标。可持续发展报告的质量不是一个目标,只是一个评估实体所开展活动的可持续性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KUALITAS SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING DALAM RISET PELAPORAN KORPORAT
The Sustainability Reporting (SR) quality had questioned because there is no standard in preparing SR enforced by standard setters in Indonesia. The SR quality had anticipated by reviewing corporate reporting research. Therefore, this study investigates the quality of SR in corporate reporting research. This study uses a systematic literature review from 2007-2020 through articles based on selected databases. The results showed that the measurement of the SR quality had dominated by the use of codification from the Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI). The accountability of corporate reporting, especially SR, cannot only be reviewed through GRI. The quality of SR in corporate reporting research shows that the codification proposed by other researchers besides GRI can be an alternative as a form of corporate reporting accountability. SR quality as an indicator of accountability for the implementation of the company's sustainability activities. The sustainability reporting quality is not a goal, only a tool to assess the sustainability of activities that an entity has carried out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strategic leadership in Malaysia education: A systematic literature reviews Validasi Instrumen Supervisi Akademik Digital dalam Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Menggunakan Teknologi Digital Principals’ Managerial Skills in the Elementary Schools of Southern Papua The Effect of Teacher's Decision in the Learning Process to The Implementation of Merdeka Curriculum Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Karakter di SD Athalia dengan Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1