根据临床试验指令通知疑似和意外严重不良反应-欧洲背景下立法和要求的描述性分析

E. M. Larsen, J. Grarup, D. Gey, Karoline B. Jensen, Ole Kirk
{"title":"根据临床试验指令通知疑似和意外严重不良反应-欧洲背景下立法和要求的描述性分析","authors":"E. M. Larsen, J. Grarup, D. Gey, Karoline B. Jensen, Ole Kirk","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2010.507768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Clinical Trials Directive (CTD) came into force on May 1st 2004. The CTD provides the legal basis for monitoring the safety of clinical trials and covers the requirements for notification of SUSAR. Implementation of the CTD into national legislation in each Member State has resulted in various interpretations of CTD requirements. The objective of this paper is to investigate how the European Member States administer the safety reporting requirements of the CTD and to clarify the requirements for SUSAR notification in the different Member States. Data was collected through publicly available sources and questionnaires sent to the Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in 30 European countries. The results document that Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in the different Member States administer the legislation very differently. This has resulted in different requirements for notification of SUSARs in the Member States, as well as different requirements between the Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in the same Member State. These requirements have not previously been described and the present overview of the legislation and the requirements of SUSAR reporting is of immediate practical use to especially non-commercial sponsors when conducting clinical trials in Europe.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"276 1","pages":"108 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notification of suspected and unexpected serious adverse reactions according to the Clinical Trials Directive—A descriptive analysis of the legislation and the requirements in a European context\",\"authors\":\"E. M. Larsen, J. Grarup, D. Gey, Karoline B. Jensen, Ole Kirk\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10601333.2010.507768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Clinical Trials Directive (CTD) came into force on May 1st 2004. The CTD provides the legal basis for monitoring the safety of clinical trials and covers the requirements for notification of SUSAR. Implementation of the CTD into national legislation in each Member State has resulted in various interpretations of CTD requirements. The objective of this paper is to investigate how the European Member States administer the safety reporting requirements of the CTD and to clarify the requirements for SUSAR notification in the different Member States. Data was collected through publicly available sources and questionnaires sent to the Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in 30 European countries. The results document that Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in the different Member States administer the legislation very differently. This has resulted in different requirements for notification of SUSARs in the Member States, as well as different requirements between the Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in the same Member State. These requirements have not previously been described and the present overview of the legislation and the requirements of SUSAR reporting is of immediate practical use to especially non-commercial sponsors when conducting clinical trials in Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs\",\"volume\":\"276 1\",\"pages\":\"108 - 120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2010.507768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2010.507768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲临床试验指令(CTD)于2004年5月1日生效。《临床试验指引》为监察临床试验的安全性提供法律依据,并涵盖有关通知临床试验的规定。在每个会员国的国家立法中执行CTD导致了对CTD要求的不同解释。本文的目的是调查欧洲成员国如何管理CTD的安全报告要求,并澄清不同成员国对SUSAR通知的要求。数据是通过公开渠道收集的,并向30个欧洲国家的主管当局和伦理委员会发送了调查问卷。结果表明,不同会员国的主管当局和道德委员会对立法的管理非常不同。这导致各会员国对通报特别卫星的要求不同,同一会员国的主管当局和道德委员会之间的要求也不同。这些要求以前没有被描述过,目前对立法和SUSAR报告要求的概述对在欧洲进行临床试验的非商业赞助商具有直接的实际用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Notification of suspected and unexpected serious adverse reactions according to the Clinical Trials Directive—A descriptive analysis of the legislation and the requirements in a European context
The European Clinical Trials Directive (CTD) came into force on May 1st 2004. The CTD provides the legal basis for monitoring the safety of clinical trials and covers the requirements for notification of SUSAR. Implementation of the CTD into national legislation in each Member State has resulted in various interpretations of CTD requirements. The objective of this paper is to investigate how the European Member States administer the safety reporting requirements of the CTD and to clarify the requirements for SUSAR notification in the different Member States. Data was collected through publicly available sources and questionnaires sent to the Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in 30 European countries. The results document that Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in the different Member States administer the legislation very differently. This has resulted in different requirements for notification of SUSARs in the Member States, as well as different requirements between the Competent Authorities and Ethics Committees in the same Member State. These requirements have not previously been described and the present overview of the legislation and the requirements of SUSAR reporting is of immediate practical use to especially non-commercial sponsors when conducting clinical trials in Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes to protocol in the regulation of adverse drug reactions – historical and current European view Policy and regulations in light of the human body as a ‘superorganism’ containing multiple, intertwined symbiotic relationships Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perceptions on risk management plans in the Southern Region of Portugal Increasing the odds of effective drug development: Elevating regulatory affairs professionals to strategic partners Current regulatory challenges and approaches in the registration of herbal drugs in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1