燃素与氧:一种新的重建及其历史基础

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA Pub Date : 2016-10-31 DOI:10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2016.237
J. L. F. López, Xavier de Donato Rodríguez
{"title":"燃素与氧:一种新的重建及其历史基础","authors":"J. L. F. López, Xavier de Donato Rodríguez","doi":"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2016.237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn este trabajo desarrollamos reconstrucciones estructuralistas de las teorias del flogisto, de Priestley, y del oxigeno, de Lavoisier. Nuestra propuesta es una alternativa a la de Caamano (2009 y 2011) en una pretension de ajustarnos mas a las formulaciones de esas teorias tal y como se dieron historicamente. EnglishIn this work we develop structuralist reconstructions of phlogiston theory, by Priestley, and oxygen theory, by Lavoisier. Our proposal is an alternative to that offered by Caamano (2009 and 2011) in an attempt to adjust better to the actual historical formulations of these theories.","PeriodicalId":43820,"journal":{"name":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","volume":"33 1","pages":"87-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flogisto versus oxígeno: una nueva reconstrucción y su fundamentación histórica\",\"authors\":\"J. L. F. López, Xavier de Donato Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2016.237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEn este trabajo desarrollamos reconstrucciones estructuralistas de las teorias del flogisto, de Priestley, y del oxigeno, de Lavoisier. Nuestra propuesta es una alternativa a la de Caamano (2009 y 2011) en una pretension de ajustarnos mas a las formulaciones de esas teorias tal y como se dieron historicamente. EnglishIn this work we develop structuralist reconstructions of phlogiston theory, by Priestley, and oxygen theory, by Lavoisier. Our proposal is an alternative to that offered by Caamano (2009 and 2011) in an attempt to adjust better to the actual historical formulations of these theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"87-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2016.237\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2016.237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这项工作中,我们发展了普里斯特利的燃素理论和拉瓦锡的氧气理论的结构重建。我们的建议是Caamano(2009和2011)的替代方案,旨在更符合这些理论的公式,因为它们是历史上给出的。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为。Our提案is an替代to that offered by Caamano(2009年和2011年)in an特意to adjust better to the当前历史formulations这些不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flogisto versus oxígeno: una nueva reconstrucción y su fundamentación histórica
espanolEn este trabajo desarrollamos reconstrucciones estructuralistas de las teorias del flogisto, de Priestley, y del oxigeno, de Lavoisier. Nuestra propuesta es una alternativa a la de Caamano (2009 y 2011) en una pretension de ajustarnos mas a las formulaciones de esas teorias tal y como se dieron historicamente. EnglishIn this work we develop structuralist reconstructions of phlogiston theory, by Priestley, and oxygen theory, by Lavoisier. Our proposal is an alternative to that offered by Caamano (2009 and 2011) in an attempt to adjust better to the actual historical formulations of these theories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aesthetics of Food Porn Food, Art and Philosophy Can Food Be Art in Virtue of Its Savour Alone? Meals, Art and Meaning Términos peyorativos de grupo, estereotipos y actos de habla
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1