你在乎还是我有选择?药品消费中的专家权威与消费者自主权

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Consumption Markets & Culture Pub Date : 2020-09-03 DOI:10.1080/10253866.2020.1814260
Anna Schneider-Kamp, Søren Askegaard
{"title":"你在乎还是我有选择?药品消费中的专家权威与消费者自主权","authors":"Anna Schneider-Kamp, Søren Askegaard","doi":"10.1080/10253866.2020.1814260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Consumer research has posited an ambivalent role of choice in consumer empowerment, from liberating and including to disciplining and totalising. This article provides empirical evidence for this ambivalence and nuances how consumers navigate the liminal space between expert authority and consumer autonomy. We investigate the role of choice in consumer empowerment through an ethnographic study of medicine consumption practices in acute non-life-threatening situations in Denmark, finding these practices to be dominated by consumer choice, not only for over-the-counter but, interestingly, also for prescription-only medicine. The implications of these findings extend beyond the context of medicine consumption. First, we provide insights on the ambivalent role of choice in consumer empowerment in a complex context of mixed commercial and public agencies. Second, we demonstrate how online information access empowers consumers to resist expert authority and act autonomously. Third, we exemplify the processes by which globalisation and ideologies inform and shape consumer resistance.","PeriodicalId":47423,"journal":{"name":"Consumption Markets & Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do you care or do I have a choice? Expert authority and consumer autonomy in medicine consumption\",\"authors\":\"Anna Schneider-Kamp, Søren Askegaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10253866.2020.1814260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Consumer research has posited an ambivalent role of choice in consumer empowerment, from liberating and including to disciplining and totalising. This article provides empirical evidence for this ambivalence and nuances how consumers navigate the liminal space between expert authority and consumer autonomy. We investigate the role of choice in consumer empowerment through an ethnographic study of medicine consumption practices in acute non-life-threatening situations in Denmark, finding these practices to be dominated by consumer choice, not only for over-the-counter but, interestingly, also for prescription-only medicine. The implications of these findings extend beyond the context of medicine consumption. First, we provide insights on the ambivalent role of choice in consumer empowerment in a complex context of mixed commercial and public agencies. Second, we demonstrate how online information access empowers consumers to resist expert authority and act autonomously. Third, we exemplify the processes by which globalisation and ideologies inform and shape consumer resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consumption Markets & Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consumption Markets & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2020.1814260\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumption Markets & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2020.1814260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

消费者研究提出了一个矛盾的角色选择在消费者授权,从解放和包括纪律和综合。本文为这种矛盾心理和细微差别提供了经验证据,说明消费者如何在专家权威和消费者自主之间的有限空间中导航。我们通过对丹麦急性非危及生命情况下药物消费实践的民族志研究,调查了选择在消费者赋权中的作用,发现这些实践由消费者选择主导,不仅是非处方药,而且有趣的是,仅处方药物也是如此。这些发现的影响超出了药物消费的范围。首先,我们提供了在商业和公共机构混合的复杂背景下,选择在消费者赋权中的矛盾作用的见解。其次,我们展示了在线信息访问如何使消费者能够抵制专家权威并自主行动。第三,我们举例说明了全球化和意识形态告知和塑造消费者抵抗的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do you care or do I have a choice? Expert authority and consumer autonomy in medicine consumption
ABSTRACT Consumer research has posited an ambivalent role of choice in consumer empowerment, from liberating and including to disciplining and totalising. This article provides empirical evidence for this ambivalence and nuances how consumers navigate the liminal space between expert authority and consumer autonomy. We investigate the role of choice in consumer empowerment through an ethnographic study of medicine consumption practices in acute non-life-threatening situations in Denmark, finding these practices to be dominated by consumer choice, not only for over-the-counter but, interestingly, also for prescription-only medicine. The implications of these findings extend beyond the context of medicine consumption. First, we provide insights on the ambivalent role of choice in consumer empowerment in a complex context of mixed commercial and public agencies. Second, we demonstrate how online information access empowers consumers to resist expert authority and act autonomously. Third, we exemplify the processes by which globalisation and ideologies inform and shape consumer resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Critical discourse analysis of fast fashion companies' legitimation strategies on Instagram Architecting virtual storefronts: how in-game shops are designed to encourage consumption Re-classifying consumer research Legitimizing sustainable game meat consumption: a discursive-visual approach to legitimacy claims Reimagining the inevitable: how metaverse imaginaries construct understandings of privacy and surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1