健康科学研究生教育中使用的学习和教学方法理论:范围审查。

Patricia McInerney, Lionel Patrick Green-Thompson
{"title":"健康科学研究生教育中使用的学习和教学方法理论:范围审查。","authors":"Patricia McInerney, Lionel Patrick Green-Thompson","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review was to determine the theories of learning and methods used in teaching in postgraduate education in the health sciences. The longer-term objective was to use the information gathered to design a workshop for teachers of postgraduate students.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whilst undergraduate teaching in the health sciences has received considerable attention in the literature in terms of methods used, innovative ideas and outcomes, the same cannot be said of postgraduate education. A considerable amount of postgraduate teaching takes place in the workplace and often in the form of informal teaching. The increasing complexity of health problems calls for innovative teaching.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Papers included in this review were those that considered postgraduate education in the health science disciplines, including but not limited to medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, pharmacy and dentistry, and that described theories of learning and/or teaching methods used in teaching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched for the period 2001 through 2016. PubMed yielded the most records (3142). No relevant papers were identified through hand searching of the references of the included papers. A data extraction table was developed and used to extract relevant information from included papers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one papers were included in the review. Most of the included papers were from the USA, with 17 published in 2015. Descriptive study designs were the most frequently identified study design. Most of the papers were from the medical disciplines. Twenty-seven papers did not refer to a teaching and learning theory, a further group referred to a theory but often towards the end of the paper, and seven papers had as their focus the importance of theories in medical education. The theories named were of a wide variety. Likewise, a wide range of teaching methods were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is clear that a range of theories and teaching methods are used in postgraduate health science education, with educators feeling the need to explore more innovative methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"130 1","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theories of learning and teaching methods used in postgraduate education in the health sciences: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia McInerney, Lionel Patrick Green-Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review was to determine the theories of learning and methods used in teaching in postgraduate education in the health sciences. The longer-term objective was to use the information gathered to design a workshop for teachers of postgraduate students.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whilst undergraduate teaching in the health sciences has received considerable attention in the literature in terms of methods used, innovative ideas and outcomes, the same cannot be said of postgraduate education. A considerable amount of postgraduate teaching takes place in the workplace and often in the form of informal teaching. The increasing complexity of health problems calls for innovative teaching.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Papers included in this review were those that considered postgraduate education in the health science disciplines, including but not limited to medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, pharmacy and dentistry, and that described theories of learning and/or teaching methods used in teaching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched for the period 2001 through 2016. PubMed yielded the most records (3142). No relevant papers were identified through hand searching of the references of the included papers. A data extraction table was developed and used to extract relevant information from included papers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one papers were included in the review. Most of the included papers were from the USA, with 17 published in 2015. Descriptive study designs were the most frequently identified study design. Most of the papers were from the medical disciplines. Twenty-seven papers did not refer to a teaching and learning theory, a further group referred to a theory but often towards the end of the paper, and seven papers had as their focus the importance of theories in medical education. The theories named were of a wide variety. Likewise, a wide range of teaching methods were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is clear that a range of theories and teaching methods are used in postgraduate health science education, with educators feeling the need to explore more innovative methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"1-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本综述的目的是确定健康科学研究生教育中使用的学习理论和教学方法。长期目标是利用收集到的信息为研究生教师设计一个讲习班。虽然健康科学的本科教学在使用的方法、创新理念和成果方面受到了文献的相当大的关注,但研究生教育却并非如此。相当数量的研究生教学是在工作场所进行的,通常以非正式教学的形式进行。日益复杂的卫生问题要求创新教学。纳入标准:本综述纳入的论文均考虑健康科学学科的研究生教育,包括但不限于医学、护理、职业治疗、物理治疗、药学和牙科,并描述了教学中使用的学习理论和/或教学方法。方法检索2001年至2016年11月间的5个数据库。PubMed提供了最多的记录(3142)。通过手工检索纳入论文的参考文献,未发现相关论文。制定了数据提取表,用于从纳入的论文中提取相关信息。本综述共收录了61篇论文。结果纳入文献以美国文献为主,2015年发表文献17篇。描述性研究设计是最常见的研究设计。大多数论文来自医学学科。27篇论文没有提到教学理论,另外一组论文提到了一种理论,但通常在论文的最后,还有7篇论文的重点是理论在医学教育中的重要性。所提到的理论种类繁多。同样,也确定了各种各样的教学方法。结论研究生健康科学教育运用了多种理论和教学方法,教育工作者感到有必要探索更多的创新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theories of learning and teaching methods used in postgraduate education in the health sciences: a scoping review.

Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to determine the theories of learning and methods used in teaching in postgraduate education in the health sciences. The longer-term objective was to use the information gathered to design a workshop for teachers of postgraduate students.

Introduction: Whilst undergraduate teaching in the health sciences has received considerable attention in the literature in terms of methods used, innovative ideas and outcomes, the same cannot be said of postgraduate education. A considerable amount of postgraduate teaching takes place in the workplace and often in the form of informal teaching. The increasing complexity of health problems calls for innovative teaching.

Inclusion criteria: Papers included in this review were those that considered postgraduate education in the health science disciplines, including but not limited to medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, pharmacy and dentistry, and that described theories of learning and/or teaching methods used in teaching.

Methods: Five databases were searched for the period 2001 through 2016. PubMed yielded the most records (3142). No relevant papers were identified through hand searching of the references of the included papers. A data extraction table was developed and used to extract relevant information from included papers.

Results: Sixty-one papers were included in the review. Most of the included papers were from the USA, with 17 published in 2015. Descriptive study designs were the most frequently identified study design. Most of the papers were from the medical disciplines. Twenty-seven papers did not refer to a teaching and learning theory, a further group referred to a theory but often towards the end of the paper, and seven papers had as their focus the importance of theories in medical education. The theories named were of a wide variety. Likewise, a wide range of teaching methods were identified.

Conclusions: It is clear that a range of theories and teaching methods are used in postgraduate health science education, with educators feeling the need to explore more innovative methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Admission and discharge criteria for adolescents requiring inpatient or residential mental health care: a scoping review. Adult patient and/or carer experiences of planning for hospital discharge after major trauma: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Private food safety standards in the global food supply chain: a scoping review protocol. Theories of learning and teaching methods used in postgraduate education in the health sciences: a scoping review. Advanced practice nurse professional advancement programs: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1