{"title":"膨胀双极等离子体模型的解比较","authors":"L. Musson, M. Hopkins, P. Stoltz, C. Roark","doi":"10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6634917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A common phenomenon in plasma transport is ambipolar expansion; the ambipolar expansion rate is the typical rate at which a neutral plasma will expand into a vacuum. This expansion is particularly important, for example, in understanding how quickly a plasma will fill a gap in high power electronics or in understanding how energy is transported in intense laser-driven plasmas. Often times, a plasma simulation must accurately capture the ambipolar expansion of a neutral plasma. We present simulation benchmarks for three codes: one plasma fluid code1 and two kinetic plasma codes - one of the kinetic codes using an unstructured mesh and the other a structured mesh. We compare results from these codes to analytic models and previously published simulation results. We discuss speed and accuracy for these three different approaches, specifically including a discussion of particle splitting and combining algorithms in the kinetic approaches.","PeriodicalId":6313,"journal":{"name":"2013 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)","volume":"83 1","pages":"1-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solution comparisons of models of an expanding ambipolar plasma\",\"authors\":\"L. Musson, M. Hopkins, P. Stoltz, C. Roark\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6634917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A common phenomenon in plasma transport is ambipolar expansion; the ambipolar expansion rate is the typical rate at which a neutral plasma will expand into a vacuum. This expansion is particularly important, for example, in understanding how quickly a plasma will fill a gap in high power electronics or in understanding how energy is transported in intense laser-driven plasmas. Often times, a plasma simulation must accurately capture the ambipolar expansion of a neutral plasma. We present simulation benchmarks for three codes: one plasma fluid code1 and two kinetic plasma codes - one of the kinetic codes using an unstructured mesh and the other a structured mesh. We compare results from these codes to analytic models and previously published simulation results. We discuss speed and accuracy for these three different approaches, specifically including a discussion of particle splitting and combining algorithms in the kinetic approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"1-1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6634917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6634917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Solution comparisons of models of an expanding ambipolar plasma
A common phenomenon in plasma transport is ambipolar expansion; the ambipolar expansion rate is the typical rate at which a neutral plasma will expand into a vacuum. This expansion is particularly important, for example, in understanding how quickly a plasma will fill a gap in high power electronics or in understanding how energy is transported in intense laser-driven plasmas. Often times, a plasma simulation must accurately capture the ambipolar expansion of a neutral plasma. We present simulation benchmarks for three codes: one plasma fluid code1 and two kinetic plasma codes - one of the kinetic codes using an unstructured mesh and the other a structured mesh. We compare results from these codes to analytic models and previously published simulation results. We discuss speed and accuracy for these three different approaches, specifically including a discussion of particle splitting and combining algorithms in the kinetic approaches.