客户税务执法对财务报表审计师的溢出效应:来自非连续性设计的证据

Tax eJournal Pub Date : 2020-02-20 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3487193
Travis Chow, Jeffrey A. Pittman, Muzhi Wang, Le Zhao
{"title":"客户税务执法对财务报表审计师的溢出效应:来自非连续性设计的证据","authors":"Travis Chow, Jeffrey A. Pittman, Muzhi Wang, Le Zhao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3487193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the impact of clients’ tax enforcement on financial statement auditors. In a regression discontinuity design, we exploit the firm-registration-date-based application of a new rule that assigns firms to two different tax enforcement regimes. Our analysis implies that auditors exert less effort–evident in lower audit fees and shorter audit report lags–when their clients are monitored by the more stringent tax authority. In results supporting that audit quality improves in this situation despite the fall in auditor effort, we report that clients subject to tougher tax enforcement exhibit a lower incidence of accounting restatements and tax-related restatements. Additionally, we find no evidence of impaired auditor independence evident in the informativeness of auditors’ modified opinions. Finally, we document that clients undergoing stricter tax enforcement are assigned less-experienced partners, suggesting that tax enforcement enables audit firms to optimize client-partner matching. Collectively, our research suggests that tax authority oversight engenders a positive externality by improving external audit efficiency.","PeriodicalId":22313,"journal":{"name":"Tax eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spillover Effects of Clients’ Tax Enforcement on Financial Statement Auditors: Evidence from a Discontinuity Design\",\"authors\":\"Travis Chow, Jeffrey A. Pittman, Muzhi Wang, Le Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3487193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the impact of clients’ tax enforcement on financial statement auditors. In a regression discontinuity design, we exploit the firm-registration-date-based application of a new rule that assigns firms to two different tax enforcement regimes. Our analysis implies that auditors exert less effort–evident in lower audit fees and shorter audit report lags–when their clients are monitored by the more stringent tax authority. In results supporting that audit quality improves in this situation despite the fall in auditor effort, we report that clients subject to tougher tax enforcement exhibit a lower incidence of accounting restatements and tax-related restatements. Additionally, we find no evidence of impaired auditor independence evident in the informativeness of auditors’ modified opinions. Finally, we document that clients undergoing stricter tax enforcement are assigned less-experienced partners, suggesting that tax enforcement enables audit firms to optimize client-partner matching. Collectively, our research suggests that tax authority oversight engenders a positive externality by improving external audit efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tax eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tax eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3487193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3487193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们研究客户的税务执行对财务报表审计师的影响。在回归不连续设计中,我们利用基于公司注册日期的新规则的应用,该规则将公司分配给两种不同的税收执法制度。我们的分析表明,当审计人员的客户受到更严格的税务机关的监督时,审计人员付出的努力更少,这可以从更低的审计费用和更短的审计报告延迟中看出。在这种情况下,尽管审计师的工作量有所减少,但审计质量有所提高。我们报告称,受到更严格税务执法影响的客户出现会计重述和税务相关重述的几率较低。此外,我们发现在审计师修改意见的信息量中没有明显的审计师独立性受损的证据。最后,我们记录了经历更严格税务执法的客户被分配给经验不足的合伙人,这表明税务执法使审计事务所能够优化客户-合伙人匹配。总体而言,我们的研究表明,税务机关监督通过提高外部审计效率而产生正外部性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spillover Effects of Clients’ Tax Enforcement on Financial Statement Auditors: Evidence from a Discontinuity Design
We examine the impact of clients’ tax enforcement on financial statement auditors. In a regression discontinuity design, we exploit the firm-registration-date-based application of a new rule that assigns firms to two different tax enforcement regimes. Our analysis implies that auditors exert less effort–evident in lower audit fees and shorter audit report lags–when their clients are monitored by the more stringent tax authority. In results supporting that audit quality improves in this situation despite the fall in auditor effort, we report that clients subject to tougher tax enforcement exhibit a lower incidence of accounting restatements and tax-related restatements. Additionally, we find no evidence of impaired auditor independence evident in the informativeness of auditors’ modified opinions. Finally, we document that clients undergoing stricter tax enforcement are assigned less-experienced partners, suggesting that tax enforcement enables audit firms to optimize client-partner matching. Collectively, our research suggests that tax authority oversight engenders a positive externality by improving external audit efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Puzzles in International Tax Agreements Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecast quality Workplace Transformation and Its Tax Compliance Implications Consumption Taxes and Multinational Tax Planning in the Digital Age - Evidence from the European Service Sector Tax Avoidance and Equity Pricing: The Importance of Countries’ Legal Institutions and Disclosure Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1