否定的循环本质

IF 1.1 2区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pragmatics Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.1075/prag.21062.bar
Ruti Bardenstein
{"title":"否定的循环本质","authors":"Ruti Bardenstein","doi":"10.1075/prag.21062.bar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Hebrew negation adverbial bilti ‘not’ seems to function very differently in Biblical Hebrew\n than it does in Contemporary Hebrew. This paper addresses this difference and discusses its evolution. The main question addressed\n in this paper is: How has Hebrew bilti, originally an exceptive marker (with sentential scoping), ended up\n functioning solely as a privative in contemporary Hebrew? First, this paper argues that the biblical usage of\n bilti was expanded and turned into a polyfunctional (or ‘polysemous’) item. This happened via a\n constructionalization process which led to grammatical changes (‘grammaticalization’): The initially implicated negation (via a\n generalized implicature) turned explicit (semantic). In addition, in Hebrew’s later periods, the usage of bilti\n was narrowed and it became a privative. Thus, firstly, a pragmatically motivated path of constructionalization of\n bilti in Biblical Hebrew is suggested. That is, the “pragmatic negation” that arose via a generalized\n implicature shifted to the semantic level (performing semantic negation, explicit negation). Secondly, bilti’s\n functions in post-biblical Hebrew periods are outlined, tracing its narrowing functions until its fixation in Contemporary Hebrew\n as a privative.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cyclic nature of negation\",\"authors\":\"Ruti Bardenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/prag.21062.bar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Hebrew negation adverbial bilti ‘not’ seems to function very differently in Biblical Hebrew\\n than it does in Contemporary Hebrew. This paper addresses this difference and discusses its evolution. The main question addressed\\n in this paper is: How has Hebrew bilti, originally an exceptive marker (with sentential scoping), ended up\\n functioning solely as a privative in contemporary Hebrew? First, this paper argues that the biblical usage of\\n bilti was expanded and turned into a polyfunctional (or ‘polysemous’) item. This happened via a\\n constructionalization process which led to grammatical changes (‘grammaticalization’): The initially implicated negation (via a\\n generalized implicature) turned explicit (semantic). In addition, in Hebrew’s later periods, the usage of bilti\\n was narrowed and it became a privative. Thus, firstly, a pragmatically motivated path of constructionalization of\\n bilti in Biblical Hebrew is suggested. That is, the “pragmatic negation” that arose via a generalized\\n implicature shifted to the semantic level (performing semantic negation, explicit negation). Secondly, bilti’s\\n functions in post-biblical Hebrew periods are outlined, tracing its narrowing functions until its fixation in Contemporary Hebrew\\n as a privative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21062.bar\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21062.bar","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

希伯来语的否定状语bilti“不”在圣经希伯来语和现代希伯来语中的作用似乎非常不同。本文讨论了这一差异,并讨论了其演变。本文要解决的主要问题是:希伯来语bilti最初是一个特殊的标记(具有句子范围),如何在当代希伯来语中仅作为一个剥夺语发挥作用?首先,本文认为圣经中bilti的用法被扩展并变成了一个多功能(或“多义”)的词。这是通过一个结构化过程发生的,这个过程导致了语法的变化(“语法化”):最初隐含的否定(通过广义的隐含)变成了明确的(语义的)。此外,在希伯来语的后期,bilti的用法被缩小了,它变成了一个剥夺词。因此,本文首先提出了一条以语用为动机的圣经希伯来语bilti建构路径。也就是说,由广义含义产生的“语用否定”转移到了语义层面(执行语义否定、显式否定)。其次,概述了bilti在后圣经希伯来语时期的功能,追溯其缩小的功能,直到它在当代希伯来语中固定为一个剥夺词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The cyclic nature of negation
The Hebrew negation adverbial bilti ‘not’ seems to function very differently in Biblical Hebrew than it does in Contemporary Hebrew. This paper addresses this difference and discusses its evolution. The main question addressed in this paper is: How has Hebrew bilti, originally an exceptive marker (with sentential scoping), ended up functioning solely as a privative in contemporary Hebrew? First, this paper argues that the biblical usage of bilti was expanded and turned into a polyfunctional (or ‘polysemous’) item. This happened via a constructionalization process which led to grammatical changes (‘grammaticalization’): The initially implicated negation (via a generalized implicature) turned explicit (semantic). In addition, in Hebrew’s later periods, the usage of bilti was narrowed and it became a privative. Thus, firstly, a pragmatically motivated path of constructionalization of bilti in Biblical Hebrew is suggested. That is, the “pragmatic negation” that arose via a generalized implicature shifted to the semantic level (performing semantic negation, explicit negation). Secondly, bilti’s functions in post-biblical Hebrew periods are outlined, tracing its narrowing functions until its fixation in Contemporary Hebrew as a privative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatics
Pragmatics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
期刊最新文献
What kind of laughter? Modifying requests in a foreign language Beyond the deferential view of the Chinese V pronoun nin 您 The role of multimodality and intertextuality in accentuating humor in Algerian Hirak’s posters Syntax and music for interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1