融入媒体景观:南非非政府组织媒体行动主义的制度民族志

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.22032/DBT.38715
G. Sorce
{"title":"融入媒体景观:南非非政府组织媒体行动主义的制度民族志","authors":"G. Sorce","doi":"10.22032/DBT.38715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Media Monitoring Africa (hereafter MMA), is a Johannesburg-based non-governmental organization (NGO) with the goals to increase media quality, refocus media ethics, foster media diversity, and advance media democracy. Via an institutional ethnography, conducted during six weeks of fieldwork, I take up MMA’s particular case to investigate how the NGO has become understood as “part” of the South African mediascape, rather than an auxiliary agent. Through participant observation of the NGO’s daily routines, in-depth interviews with MMA members and local media professionals, as well as textual analysis of organizational documents, I found that MMA has managed to weave into the organizational fabric of the South African mediascape. The ethnographic data reveals that MMA is commonly perceived as a necessary element of the South African mediascape—a status that moves beyond the often strictly interventionist role of activist NGOs. I argue that MMA has achieved this unique social position in the mediascape through four central organizational-activist practices: 1. consistent intervention on the same sets of issues; 2. activist innovation around the mode of their intervention(s); 3. multilateral activism (political economy, media policy, media content); and 4. successful curation of relationships with media stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":29900,"journal":{"name":"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition","volume":"81 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weaving into the mediascape: an institutional ethnography of NGO Media Activism in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"G. Sorce\",\"doi\":\"10.22032/DBT.38715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Media Monitoring Africa (hereafter MMA), is a Johannesburg-based non-governmental organization (NGO) with the goals to increase media quality, refocus media ethics, foster media diversity, and advance media democracy. Via an institutional ethnography, conducted during six weeks of fieldwork, I take up MMA’s particular case to investigate how the NGO has become understood as “part” of the South African mediascape, rather than an auxiliary agent. Through participant observation of the NGO’s daily routines, in-depth interviews with MMA members and local media professionals, as well as textual analysis of organizational documents, I found that MMA has managed to weave into the organizational fabric of the South African mediascape. The ethnographic data reveals that MMA is commonly perceived as a necessary element of the South African mediascape—a status that moves beyond the often strictly interventionist role of activist NGOs. I argue that MMA has achieved this unique social position in the mediascape through four central organizational-activist practices: 1. consistent intervention on the same sets of issues; 2. activist innovation around the mode of their intervention(s); 3. multilateral activism (political economy, media policy, media content); and 4. successful curation of relationships with media stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition\",\"volume\":\"81 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22032/DBT.38715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22032/DBT.38715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“媒体监测非洲”(以下简称“MMA”)是一个总部设在约翰内斯堡的非政府组织,其目标是提高媒体质量,重新关注媒体道德,促进媒体多样性,推进媒体民主。在为期六周的实地考察中,我以机构民族志的方式,以MMA的特殊案例为例,调查非政府组织如何被理解为南非媒体景观的“一部分”,而不是辅助机构。通过对NGO日常活动的参与观察,对MMA成员和当地媒体人士的深度访谈,以及对组织文件的文本分析,我发现MMA已经成功地融入了南非媒体的组织结构中。民族志数据显示,MMA通常被认为是南非媒体景观的必要元素——一种超越激进非政府组织通常严格干预角色的地位。我认为,综合格斗通过四个核心的组织活动实践,在媒体领域取得了这种独特的社会地位:对同一组问题的持续干预;2. 围绕积极分子干预模式的创新;3.多边行动主义(政治经济、媒体政策、媒体内容);和4。成功管理与媒体利益相关者的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weaving into the mediascape: an institutional ethnography of NGO Media Activism in South Africa
Media Monitoring Africa (hereafter MMA), is a Johannesburg-based non-governmental organization (NGO) with the goals to increase media quality, refocus media ethics, foster media diversity, and advance media democracy. Via an institutional ethnography, conducted during six weeks of fieldwork, I take up MMA’s particular case to investigate how the NGO has become understood as “part” of the South African mediascape, rather than an auxiliary agent. Through participant observation of the NGO’s daily routines, in-depth interviews with MMA members and local media professionals, as well as textual analysis of organizational documents, I found that MMA has managed to weave into the organizational fabric of the South African mediascape. The ethnographic data reveals that MMA is commonly perceived as a necessary element of the South African mediascape—a status that moves beyond the often strictly interventionist role of activist NGOs. I argue that MMA has achieved this unique social position in the mediascape through four central organizational-activist practices: 1. consistent intervention on the same sets of issues; 2. activist innovation around the mode of their intervention(s); 3. multilateral activism (political economy, media policy, media content); and 4. successful curation of relationships with media stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Towards Cosmopolitan Media and Communication Studies: Bringing diverse epistemic perspectives into the field Do YouTubers Hate Asians?: An Analysis of YouTube Users’ Anti-Asian Hatred on Major U.S. News Channels during the COVID-19 Pandemic COVID-19 from the Margins: Crafting a (Cosmopolitan) Theory Towards Cosmopolitanism in German Academia?: Shedding Light on Colonial Underpinnings of Communication Research in a Globalized World Communicating the Environment in Laos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1