波斯语中无来源证据的权力动态和语用文化来源

IF 1.1 2区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-10-04 DOI:10.1075/prag.21029.zai
A. Zaini, H. Shokouhi
{"title":"波斯语中无来源证据的权力动态和语用文化来源","authors":"A. Zaini, H. Shokouhi","doi":"10.1075/prag.21029.zai","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper investigates participants’ reflections on power relations embedded in the cultural-pragmatics of\n unsourced evidentials in Persian texts. Using Fairclough’s (2013) critical discourse\n analysis, we adopted Hanks’ (2018) ethnography of referential practices and Foucault’s (1980) power dynamics to analyse 16 Persian texts through follow up interviews\n and focus group discussions on two opposing pairs of texts – one pair on Iranian national identity versus Persian literature, and\n another on Iranian politics versus religion. Our analysis revealed that unsourced evidentials appear in Persian predominantly due\n to censorship and sometimes due to deliberate use by authors (e.g., for winning an argument). Text consumers often overlook\n unsourced evidentials while reflecting on politico-religious referents, such as inequalities and bigotry. This has roots in\n Persian literature, religion, and politics of power embedded in the culture, and the participants’ attention to inequalities and\n discriminations has roots in referential practices in current Iranian discourse.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power dynamics and pragma-cultural sources of unsourced evidentiality in Persian\",\"authors\":\"A. Zaini, H. Shokouhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/prag.21029.zai\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper investigates participants’ reflections on power relations embedded in the cultural-pragmatics of\\n unsourced evidentials in Persian texts. Using Fairclough’s (2013) critical discourse\\n analysis, we adopted Hanks’ (2018) ethnography of referential practices and Foucault’s (1980) power dynamics to analyse 16 Persian texts through follow up interviews\\n and focus group discussions on two opposing pairs of texts – one pair on Iranian national identity versus Persian literature, and\\n another on Iranian politics versus religion. Our analysis revealed that unsourced evidentials appear in Persian predominantly due\\n to censorship and sometimes due to deliberate use by authors (e.g., for winning an argument). Text consumers often overlook\\n unsourced evidentials while reflecting on politico-religious referents, such as inequalities and bigotry. This has roots in\\n Persian literature, religion, and politics of power embedded in the culture, and the participants’ attention to inequalities and\\n discriminations has roots in referential practices in current Iranian discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21029.zai\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21029.zai","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文调查了参与者对波斯文本中无来源证据的文化语用学中嵌入的权力关系的反思。利用费尔克劳(2013)的批判性话语分析,我们采用汉克斯(2018)的参考实践民族志和福柯(1980)的权力动力学,通过对两对对立文本的后续访谈和焦点小组讨论来分析16个波斯文本——一对关于伊朗民族认同与波斯文学,另一对关于伊朗政治与宗教。我们的分析显示,在波斯语中出现无来源的证据主要是由于审查制度,有时是由于作者故意使用(例如,为了赢得一场辩论)。文本消费者往往忽略无来源的证据,而反映政治和宗教的指涉,如不平等和偏见。这源于波斯文化中的文学、宗教和权力政治,参与者对不平等和歧视的关注源于当前伊朗话语中的参考实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power dynamics and pragma-cultural sources of unsourced evidentiality in Persian
This paper investigates participants’ reflections on power relations embedded in the cultural-pragmatics of unsourced evidentials in Persian texts. Using Fairclough’s (2013) critical discourse analysis, we adopted Hanks’ (2018) ethnography of referential practices and Foucault’s (1980) power dynamics to analyse 16 Persian texts through follow up interviews and focus group discussions on two opposing pairs of texts – one pair on Iranian national identity versus Persian literature, and another on Iranian politics versus religion. Our analysis revealed that unsourced evidentials appear in Persian predominantly due to censorship and sometimes due to deliberate use by authors (e.g., for winning an argument). Text consumers often overlook unsourced evidentials while reflecting on politico-religious referents, such as inequalities and bigotry. This has roots in Persian literature, religion, and politics of power embedded in the culture, and the participants’ attention to inequalities and discriminations has roots in referential practices in current Iranian discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatics
Pragmatics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
期刊最新文献
What kind of laughter? Modifying requests in a foreign language Beyond the deferential view of the Chinese V pronoun nin 您 The role of multimodality and intertextuality in accentuating humor in Algerian Hirak’s posters Syntax and music for interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1