{"title":"DES和Dömösi密码系统的比较","authors":"Zoltan Pal Mecsei","doi":"10.17345/triangle8.81-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compare the well known DES cryptosystem with the recently introduced Dömösi system, which is based on nite automata. We do a time complexity analysis on both algrithms. We show that without making use of an auxiliary matrix the Dömösi cryptosystem is slower than DES. However, the use of auxiliary matrices makes the former perform better than its well known counterpart for some block lengths.","PeriodicalId":76763,"journal":{"name":"Triangle; the Sandoz journal of medical science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of the DES and Dömösi Cryptosystems\",\"authors\":\"Zoltan Pal Mecsei\",\"doi\":\"10.17345/triangle8.81-87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we compare the well known DES cryptosystem with the recently introduced Dömösi system, which is based on nite automata. We do a time complexity analysis on both algrithms. We show that without making use of an auxiliary matrix the Dömösi cryptosystem is slower than DES. However, the use of auxiliary matrices makes the former perform better than its well known counterpart for some block lengths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Triangle; the Sandoz journal of medical science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Triangle; the Sandoz journal of medical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17345/triangle8.81-87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Triangle; the Sandoz journal of medical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17345/triangle8.81-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper we compare the well known DES cryptosystem with the recently introduced Dömösi system, which is based on nite automata. We do a time complexity analysis on both algrithms. We show that without making use of an auxiliary matrix the Dömösi cryptosystem is slower than DES. However, the use of auxiliary matrices makes the former perform better than its well known counterpart for some block lengths.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
