{"title":"论中间句与被动句的关系","authors":"Mikyung. Ahn, Foong Ha Yap","doi":"10.1075/lali.00081.ahn","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Previous studies using diachronic data from the Sejong Historical Corpus have traced the semantic\n extension of voice marker -eci from middle to passive uses (e.g. Ahn & Yap\n 2017). In this study, based on data from the Sejong Contemporary Spoken Corpus, we further examine the\n relationship between middle and passive uses of -eci constructions, with special attention to the neutralization of\n adversative readings that give rise to generalized (in addition to adversative) middle and passive -eci constructions. Our\n analysis reveals that judgments about adversative readings in Contemporary Korean are not emergent solely from the semantics of the verb or\n adjective preceding -eci but additionally are emergent and grounded in the interaction between discourse participants. The\n distributional characteristics of -eci also show a strong interaction between voice and tense-aspect-mood (TAM).\n There is also some interaction effects from register and text type/genre, particularly in the usage frequency distribution of spontaneous\n and passive -eci constructions. In addition, contrary to the traditional notion that -eci is essentially a\n passive marker, in real usage, -eci is still far more frequently used as a middle marker than a passive marker.","PeriodicalId":45159,"journal":{"name":"Language and Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the relationship between middles and passives\",\"authors\":\"Mikyung. Ahn, Foong Ha Yap\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lali.00081.ahn\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Previous studies using diachronic data from the Sejong Historical Corpus have traced the semantic\\n extension of voice marker -eci from middle to passive uses (e.g. Ahn & Yap\\n 2017). In this study, based on data from the Sejong Contemporary Spoken Corpus, we further examine the\\n relationship between middle and passive uses of -eci constructions, with special attention to the neutralization of\\n adversative readings that give rise to generalized (in addition to adversative) middle and passive -eci constructions. Our\\n analysis reveals that judgments about adversative readings in Contemporary Korean are not emergent solely from the semantics of the verb or\\n adjective preceding -eci but additionally are emergent and grounded in the interaction between discourse participants. The\\n distributional characteristics of -eci also show a strong interaction between voice and tense-aspect-mood (TAM).\\n There is also some interaction effects from register and text type/genre, particularly in the usage frequency distribution of spontaneous\\n and passive -eci constructions. In addition, contrary to the traditional notion that -eci is essentially a\\n passive marker, in real usage, -eci is still far more frequently used as a middle marker than a passive marker.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00081.ahn\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00081.ahn","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Previous studies using diachronic data from the Sejong Historical Corpus have traced the semantic
extension of voice marker -eci from middle to passive uses (e.g. Ahn & Yap
2017). In this study, based on data from the Sejong Contemporary Spoken Corpus, we further examine the
relationship between middle and passive uses of -eci constructions, with special attention to the neutralization of
adversative readings that give rise to generalized (in addition to adversative) middle and passive -eci constructions. Our
analysis reveals that judgments about adversative readings in Contemporary Korean are not emergent solely from the semantics of the verb or
adjective preceding -eci but additionally are emergent and grounded in the interaction between discourse participants. The
distributional characteristics of -eci also show a strong interaction between voice and tense-aspect-mood (TAM).
There is also some interaction effects from register and text type/genre, particularly in the usage frequency distribution of spontaneous
and passive -eci constructions. In addition, contrary to the traditional notion that -eci is essentially a
passive marker, in real usage, -eci is still far more frequently used as a middle marker than a passive marker.
期刊介绍:
LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS (ISSN:1606-822X; Online ISSN: 2309-5067) is an academic publication of the Institute of Linguistics at Academia Sinica. Established in 2000, it publishes research in general and theoretical linguistics on the languages of East Asia and the Pacific region, including Sino-Tibetan, Austronesian, and the Austroasiatic and Altaic language families (Indo-European and Afro-Asiatic languages are not included). LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS publishes both a journal and a monograph series. LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS is a pure linguistics journal. We only publish articles on (descriptive and theoretical) linguistic studies but not articles on applied linguistics such as language teaching or language learning.