OFHC铜管高应变成形的炸药类型研究

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI:10.1177/03093247211021240
R. Yildiz
{"title":"OFHC铜管高应变成形的炸药类型研究","authors":"R. Yildiz","doi":"10.1177/03093247211021240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper computationally investigates the explosive forming of the oxygen-free high thermal conductivity (OFHC) copper tube subjected to five different explosives. To investigate the effect of explosive type on the formability of OFHC copper tube, commonly used explosives, including C-4, TNT, HMX, Comp-B, and PBXN, was compared by using the finite element method. To verify the developed finite element model (FEM), the explosive forming experiments were carried out by using C-4. In the simulations, Coupled-Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) method to model the large deformations, Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL) equations of state (EOS) to define the explosive properties and Johnson-Cook (J-C) strength and damage models to specify the metal’s mechanical behavior were utilized. Besides, Hillerborg’s fracture energy was calculated with the Charpy impact test results and given as input to the FEM. The results of FEM were compared and verified using the results of explosive forming tests considering the mesh density and friction coefficient. The simulations revealed that the explosive type affected both the final shape and also the strain rate of the copper tube. When the simulation results for C-4 was taken as reference, HMX and PBX-N increased the strain rate as 110%, roughly. However, Comp-B and TNT reduced the strain rate by nearly 10% and 22%, respectively. Also, the explosive type changed the final hardness of the metal. OFHC Copper had the lowest hardness (112.7 HV) when the simulations were conducted with TNT. In contrast, the highest hardness value (129.5 HV) was reached when HMX was used in the simulations. In addition, simulations put forth that Hillerborg’s fracture energy criteria could be used in the explosive simulations to predict the damage on the metals.","PeriodicalId":50038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the explosive type on the high strain forming of OFHC copper tube\",\"authors\":\"R. Yildiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03093247211021240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper computationally investigates the explosive forming of the oxygen-free high thermal conductivity (OFHC) copper tube subjected to five different explosives. To investigate the effect of explosive type on the formability of OFHC copper tube, commonly used explosives, including C-4, TNT, HMX, Comp-B, and PBXN, was compared by using the finite element method. To verify the developed finite element model (FEM), the explosive forming experiments were carried out by using C-4. In the simulations, Coupled-Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) method to model the large deformations, Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL) equations of state (EOS) to define the explosive properties and Johnson-Cook (J-C) strength and damage models to specify the metal’s mechanical behavior were utilized. Besides, Hillerborg’s fracture energy was calculated with the Charpy impact test results and given as input to the FEM. The results of FEM were compared and verified using the results of explosive forming tests considering the mesh density and friction coefficient. The simulations revealed that the explosive type affected both the final shape and also the strain rate of the copper tube. When the simulation results for C-4 was taken as reference, HMX and PBX-N increased the strain rate as 110%, roughly. However, Comp-B and TNT reduced the strain rate by nearly 10% and 22%, respectively. Also, the explosive type changed the final hardness of the metal. OFHC Copper had the lowest hardness (112.7 HV) when the simulations were conducted with TNT. In contrast, the highest hardness value (129.5 HV) was reached when HMX was used in the simulations. In addition, simulations put forth that Hillerborg’s fracture energy criteria could be used in the explosive simulations to predict the damage on the metals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03093247211021240\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03093247211021240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对五种不同炸药作用下无氧高导热铜管的爆炸成形进行了计算研究。为了研究炸药种类对OFHC铜管成形性的影响,采用有限元法比较了常用炸药C-4、TNT、HMX、Comp-B和PBXN。为了验证所建立的有限元模型,采用C-4进行了爆炸成形实验。在模拟中,采用耦合欧拉-拉格朗日(CEL)方法模拟大变形,Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL)状态方程(EOS)定义爆炸特性,Johnson-Cook (J-C)强度和损伤模型描述金属的力学行为。利用Charpy冲击试验结果计算Hillerborg断裂能,并将其作为有限元输入。考虑啮合密度和摩擦系数,将有限元计算结果与爆炸成形试验结果进行了比较和验证。模拟结果表明,爆炸类型对铜管的最终形状和应变速率都有影响。以C-4的模拟结果为参照,HMX和PBX-N的应变率提高幅度大致为110%。而Comp-B和TNT分别降低了近10%和22%的应变速率。同时,爆炸类型改变了金属的最终硬度。用TNT进行模拟时,OFHC铜的硬度最低,为112.7 HV。采用HMX合金时,合金硬度最高,达到129.5 HV。此外,模拟还提出了希勒堡断裂能准则可用于爆炸模拟中对金属损伤的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of the explosive type on the high strain forming of OFHC copper tube
The paper computationally investigates the explosive forming of the oxygen-free high thermal conductivity (OFHC) copper tube subjected to five different explosives. To investigate the effect of explosive type on the formability of OFHC copper tube, commonly used explosives, including C-4, TNT, HMX, Comp-B, and PBXN, was compared by using the finite element method. To verify the developed finite element model (FEM), the explosive forming experiments were carried out by using C-4. In the simulations, Coupled-Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) method to model the large deformations, Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL) equations of state (EOS) to define the explosive properties and Johnson-Cook (J-C) strength and damage models to specify the metal’s mechanical behavior were utilized. Besides, Hillerborg’s fracture energy was calculated with the Charpy impact test results and given as input to the FEM. The results of FEM were compared and verified using the results of explosive forming tests considering the mesh density and friction coefficient. The simulations revealed that the explosive type affected both the final shape and also the strain rate of the copper tube. When the simulation results for C-4 was taken as reference, HMX and PBX-N increased the strain rate as 110%, roughly. However, Comp-B and TNT reduced the strain rate by nearly 10% and 22%, respectively. Also, the explosive type changed the final hardness of the metal. OFHC Copper had the lowest hardness (112.7 HV) when the simulations were conducted with TNT. In contrast, the highest hardness value (129.5 HV) was reached when HMX was used in the simulations. In addition, simulations put forth that Hillerborg’s fracture energy criteria could be used in the explosive simulations to predict the damage on the metals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design provides a forum for work relating to the measurement and analysis of strain that is appropriate to engineering design and practice. "Since launching in 1965, The Journal of Strain Analysis has been a collegiate effort, dedicated to providing exemplary service to our authors. We welcome contributions related to analytical, experimental, and numerical techniques for the analysis and/or measurement of stress and/or strain, or studies of relevant material properties and failure modes. Our international Editorial Board contains experts in all of these fields and is keen to encourage papers on novel techniques and innovative applications." Professor Eann Patterson - University of Liverpool, UK This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Anti-plane analysis of a crack terminating at interface of the isotropic half-planes bonded to intact orthotropic layers Compressive performance of paper honeycomb core layer with double-hole in cell walls A novel multiaxial fatigue life prediction model based on the critical plane theory and machine-learning method Non-linear analysis of the flexural-torsional stability of slender tropical glulam beams Approximate methods for contact problems involving beams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1