Lindsay A Lo, Caroline A MacCallum, Jade C Yau, William J Panenka, Alasdair M Barr
{"title":"医用大麻药房使用者样本中与有问题的大麻使用相关的因素。","authors":"Lindsay A Lo, Caroline A MacCallum, Jade C Yau, William J Panenka, Alasdair M Barr","doi":"10.5152/pcp.2022.22358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the recent legalization of cannabis for medical purposes in many countries, there has been an increased number of individuals using such products. While there is considerable evidence indicating that cannabis may have therapeutic effects for a range of different conditions, concerns remain about the risk of developing cannabis use disorders for those at risk, or patients without appropriate clinical guidance. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of problematic cannabis use in a cohort of cannabis users who consumed the drug for medical purposes and to identify potential risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred individuals who self-identified as using cannabis to improve their mental health were recruited from a community dispensary. Extensive details were collected about subjects' patterns of cannabis use and reasons for use. All subjects completed a structured clinical interview with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, while information about perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and somatic symptoms were recorded with the Perceived Stress Scale-10, Beck Depression Inventory, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rates of problematic cannabis use were high, with 30% meeting the criteria. Only 10% of subjects reported medical cannabis use was recommended by their doctor. Significant risk factors for problematic use included earlier age of cannabis initiation, as well as self-reported use of cannabis products for depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of problematic cannabis use in the community dispensary was higher than expected. Specific risk factors for problematic cannabis use may represent important areas for future intervention to ensure safer consumption for medical purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50471,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Biology","volume":"44 1","pages":"262-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with Problematic Cannabis Use in a Sample of Medical Cannabis Dispensary Users.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay A Lo, Caroline A MacCallum, Jade C Yau, William J Panenka, Alasdair M Barr\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/pcp.2022.22358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the recent legalization of cannabis for medical purposes in many countries, there has been an increased number of individuals using such products. While there is considerable evidence indicating that cannabis may have therapeutic effects for a range of different conditions, concerns remain about the risk of developing cannabis use disorders for those at risk, or patients without appropriate clinical guidance. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of problematic cannabis use in a cohort of cannabis users who consumed the drug for medical purposes and to identify potential risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred individuals who self-identified as using cannabis to improve their mental health were recruited from a community dispensary. Extensive details were collected about subjects' patterns of cannabis use and reasons for use. All subjects completed a structured clinical interview with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, while information about perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and somatic symptoms were recorded with the Perceived Stress Scale-10, Beck Depression Inventory, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rates of problematic cannabis use were high, with 30% meeting the criteria. Only 10% of subjects reported medical cannabis use was recommended by their doctor. Significant risk factors for problematic use included earlier age of cannabis initiation, as well as self-reported use of cannabis products for depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of problematic cannabis use in the community dispensary was higher than expected. Specific risk factors for problematic cannabis use may represent important areas for future intervention to ensure safer consumption for medical purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Biology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"262-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2022.22358\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2022.22358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors Associated with Problematic Cannabis Use in a Sample of Medical Cannabis Dispensary Users.
Background: With the recent legalization of cannabis for medical purposes in many countries, there has been an increased number of individuals using such products. While there is considerable evidence indicating that cannabis may have therapeutic effects for a range of different conditions, concerns remain about the risk of developing cannabis use disorders for those at risk, or patients without appropriate clinical guidance. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of problematic cannabis use in a cohort of cannabis users who consumed the drug for medical purposes and to identify potential risk factors.
Methods: One hundred individuals who self-identified as using cannabis to improve their mental health were recruited from a community dispensary. Extensive details were collected about subjects' patterns of cannabis use and reasons for use. All subjects completed a structured clinical interview with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, while information about perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and somatic symptoms were recorded with the Perceived Stress Scale-10, Beck Depression Inventory, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-15.
Results: Rates of problematic cannabis use were high, with 30% meeting the criteria. Only 10% of subjects reported medical cannabis use was recommended by their doctor. Significant risk factors for problematic use included earlier age of cannabis initiation, as well as self-reported use of cannabis products for depression.
Conclusions: The prevalence of problematic cannabis use in the community dispensary was higher than expected. Specific risk factors for problematic cannabis use may represent important areas for future intervention to ensure safer consumption for medical purposes.
期刊介绍:
The aim, scope, and format of Evolutionary Biology will be based on the following principles:
Evolutionary Biology will publish original articles and reviews that address issues and subjects of core concern in evolutionary biology. All papers must make original contributions to our understanding of the evolutionary process.
The journal will remain true to the original intent of the original series to provide a place for broad syntheses in evolutionary biology. Articles will contribute to this goal by defining the direction of current and future research and by building conceptual links between disciplines. In articles presenting an empirical analysis, the results of these analyses must be integrated within a broader evolutionary framework.
Authors are encouraged to submit papers presenting novel conceptual frameworks or major challenges to accepted ideas.
While brevity is encouraged, there is no formal restriction on length for major articles.
The journal aims to keep the time between original submission and appearance online to within four months and will encourage authors to revise rapidly once a paper has been submitted and deemed acceptable.