书评:抱怨!萨拉·艾哈迈德

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-09-16 DOI:10.1177/09593535221126104
Nathaniel E. C. Schermerhorn
{"title":"书评:抱怨!萨拉·艾哈迈德","authors":"Nathaniel E. C. Schermerhorn","doi":"10.1177/09593535221126104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In May of 2016, Sara Ahmed announced that she had resigned from Goldsmiths following the university’s failure to respond to many years of allegations of sexual harassment from multiple women, and despite formal complaints from herself and others (Ahmed, 2016). However, the university’s failure to respond to sexual harassment was, at the same time, its achievement in maintaining systems of power and privilege within the institution. In her latest book, Complaint!, Sara Ahmed examines complaints of harassment within the academy. In doing so, she presents a detailed and compelling analysis of what leads people to file a formal complaint (and why they might not), the aftermath of complaining, and the various ways in which institutions wield their power to dismiss complaints and maintain systems of inequity. Two important assertions frame Ahmed’s analysis. First, the social perception of complaining as negative leads to the dismissal and silencing of individuals’ complaints. There is a tendency to associate the act of complaining with insignificant moments and complainers as pushy or annoying; as Ahmed (2021) notes, “to be heard as complaining is not to be heard” (p. 1). Ahmed’s book intervenes against this, providing a hearing for those who have been silenced, and making visible the ways in which institutions have silenced those whose experiences threaten to delegitimize their status. Second, complaint is inextricably linked to power. Ahmed analyzes how complaint can be a method of challenging power but also how institutions use their power to dismiss complaints and, by extension, the experiences of the individual lodging the complaint. Integrating concepts she has forwarded from previous work, such as “a feminist ear” (Ahmed, 2017), “nonperformativity” (Ahmed, 2012), and “institutional death” (Ahmed, 2019), Ahmed expertly and thoroughly dissects what comes before a complaint, what happens during the complaint process, what comes after a complaint, and the impact that this has on the person who has submitted the complaint. Complaint! takes as its unit of analysis the “complaint biography”—the entire life of a complaint in relation to the person or group complaining—and examines the complicated, nonlinear, and often incomplete timeline of complaints. Employing a feminist ear to hear both who is not heard and how they are not heard (Ahmed, 2021, p. 3), Ahmed analyzes Feminism & Psychology 2023, Vol. 33(2) 314–322 © The Author(s) 2022","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Complaint! by Sara Ahmed\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel E. C. Schermerhorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09593535221126104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In May of 2016, Sara Ahmed announced that she had resigned from Goldsmiths following the university’s failure to respond to many years of allegations of sexual harassment from multiple women, and despite formal complaints from herself and others (Ahmed, 2016). However, the university’s failure to respond to sexual harassment was, at the same time, its achievement in maintaining systems of power and privilege within the institution. In her latest book, Complaint!, Sara Ahmed examines complaints of harassment within the academy. In doing so, she presents a detailed and compelling analysis of what leads people to file a formal complaint (and why they might not), the aftermath of complaining, and the various ways in which institutions wield their power to dismiss complaints and maintain systems of inequity. Two important assertions frame Ahmed’s analysis. First, the social perception of complaining as negative leads to the dismissal and silencing of individuals’ complaints. There is a tendency to associate the act of complaining with insignificant moments and complainers as pushy or annoying; as Ahmed (2021) notes, “to be heard as complaining is not to be heard” (p. 1). Ahmed’s book intervenes against this, providing a hearing for those who have been silenced, and making visible the ways in which institutions have silenced those whose experiences threaten to delegitimize their status. Second, complaint is inextricably linked to power. Ahmed analyzes how complaint can be a method of challenging power but also how institutions use their power to dismiss complaints and, by extension, the experiences of the individual lodging the complaint. Integrating concepts she has forwarded from previous work, such as “a feminist ear” (Ahmed, 2017), “nonperformativity” (Ahmed, 2012), and “institutional death” (Ahmed, 2019), Ahmed expertly and thoroughly dissects what comes before a complaint, what happens during the complaint process, what comes after a complaint, and the impact that this has on the person who has submitted the complaint. Complaint! takes as its unit of analysis the “complaint biography”—the entire life of a complaint in relation to the person or group complaining—and examines the complicated, nonlinear, and often incomplete timeline of complaints. Employing a feminist ear to hear both who is not heard and how they are not heard (Ahmed, 2021, p. 3), Ahmed analyzes Feminism & Psychology 2023, Vol. 33(2) 314–322 © The Author(s) 2022\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221126104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221126104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2016年5月,萨拉·艾哈迈德(Sara Ahmed)宣布,她已从金史密斯学院辞职,原因是该校多年来未能回应多名女性的性骚扰指控,尽管她自己和其他人都正式提出了投诉(艾哈迈德,2016)。然而,这所大学未能对性骚扰做出回应,同时也是它在维持学校内部权力和特权制度方面的成就。在她的新书《抱怨!》,萨拉·艾哈迈德调查了学院内部的骚扰投诉。在此过程中,她详细而引人注目地分析了是什么导致人们提出正式投诉(以及为什么他们可能不会),投诉的后果,以及机构运用其权力驳回投诉和维持不平等制度的各种方式。两个重要的论断构成了艾哈迈德的分析。首先,社会认为抱怨是消极的,导致个人的抱怨被驳回和沉默。人们倾向于把抱怨的行为与无关紧要的时刻联系在一起,把抱怨的人看作是咄咄逼人或令人讨厌的;正如Ahmed(2021)所指出的那样,“被人听到是在抱怨,而不是被人听到”(第1页)。Ahmed的书对此进行了干预,为那些被噤声的人提供了一个听证会,并揭示了机构是如何让那些经历有可能使其地位失去合法性的人噤声的。其次,抱怨与权力有着千丝万缕的联系。艾哈迈德分析了投诉如何成为挑战权力的一种方法,也分析了机构如何利用其权力来驳回投诉,并进一步分析了提出投诉的个人的经历。结合她从以前的工作中提出的概念,如“女权主义的耳朵”(Ahmed, 2017)、“非表演性”(Ahmed, 2012)和“制度死亡”(Ahmed, 2019), Ahmed专业而彻底地剖析了投诉之前的情况、投诉过程中发生的情况、投诉之后的情况,以及这对提交投诉者的影响。投诉!以“投诉传记”为分析单元,即与投诉者或投诉者有关的投诉的整个生命历程,并考察了复杂的、非线性的、往往不完整的投诉时间轴。利用女权主义者的耳朵来听到谁没有被听到,以及他们是如何被听到的(艾哈迈德,2021年,第3页),艾哈迈德分析女权主义和心理学2023,Vol. 33(2) 314-322©The Author(s) 2022
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Complaint! by Sara Ahmed
In May of 2016, Sara Ahmed announced that she had resigned from Goldsmiths following the university’s failure to respond to many years of allegations of sexual harassment from multiple women, and despite formal complaints from herself and others (Ahmed, 2016). However, the university’s failure to respond to sexual harassment was, at the same time, its achievement in maintaining systems of power and privilege within the institution. In her latest book, Complaint!, Sara Ahmed examines complaints of harassment within the academy. In doing so, she presents a detailed and compelling analysis of what leads people to file a formal complaint (and why they might not), the aftermath of complaining, and the various ways in which institutions wield their power to dismiss complaints and maintain systems of inequity. Two important assertions frame Ahmed’s analysis. First, the social perception of complaining as negative leads to the dismissal and silencing of individuals’ complaints. There is a tendency to associate the act of complaining with insignificant moments and complainers as pushy or annoying; as Ahmed (2021) notes, “to be heard as complaining is not to be heard” (p. 1). Ahmed’s book intervenes against this, providing a hearing for those who have been silenced, and making visible the ways in which institutions have silenced those whose experiences threaten to delegitimize their status. Second, complaint is inextricably linked to power. Ahmed analyzes how complaint can be a method of challenging power but also how institutions use their power to dismiss complaints and, by extension, the experiences of the individual lodging the complaint. Integrating concepts she has forwarded from previous work, such as “a feminist ear” (Ahmed, 2017), “nonperformativity” (Ahmed, 2012), and “institutional death” (Ahmed, 2019), Ahmed expertly and thoroughly dissects what comes before a complaint, what happens during the complaint process, what comes after a complaint, and the impact that this has on the person who has submitted the complaint. Complaint! takes as its unit of analysis the “complaint biography”—the entire life of a complaint in relation to the person or group complaining—and examines the complicated, nonlinear, and often incomplete timeline of complaints. Employing a feminist ear to hear both who is not heard and how they are not heard (Ahmed, 2021, p. 3), Ahmed analyzes Feminism & Psychology 2023, Vol. 33(2) 314–322 © The Author(s) 2022
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1