希伯来语是被发明的吗?:托拉中的字母、数字和文字游戏是否暗示圣经中的希伯来语是一种被发明的语言?

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI:10.18533/JAH.V10I08.2136
M. Egeth
{"title":"希伯来语是被发明的吗?:托拉中的字母、数字和文字游戏是否暗示圣经中的希伯来语是一种被发明的语言?","authors":"M. Egeth","doi":"10.18533/JAH.V10I08.2136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I present a straightforward secular (non-religious, non-theological) theory: the Hebrew in the Torah is an invented language, akin to Klingon or Elvish, that was designed to write the Torah. Under this theory, the letters, words, grammar, and key terms and phrases of the Biblical language were selected, co-determined, and creatively bootstrapped as a sort of language game. The invented language may have been designed, like Esperanto or Basic English, to include elements in common with known natural languages; nevertheless, the details and final form of the language were bespoke and under the control of a creative author. In the invented system, some anagrams were defined to mean related concepts; letters were assigned number values so words and phrases could “add up to” interesting numbers (“Gematria”); and the author planned a text that would include a density of word-games like pangrams (sentences that use all letters of the alphabet), lipograms (sections of the text that are missing one particular letter), and particular numbers of letters and words throughout. However, all signs of seemingly deliberate language games might instead merely be the result of cherry picking of interesting findings. In this paper, I present analysis and new approaches that might help distinguish whether the apparent language games in the Torah imply an intentional invented language or, instead, only result from over-analysis and were not intended by the author to be present in the text.","PeriodicalId":43506,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was Hebrew invented? : Do letter, number, and word-games in the Torah imply that Biblical Hebrew is an Invented Language?\",\"authors\":\"M. Egeth\",\"doi\":\"10.18533/JAH.V10I08.2136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I present a straightforward secular (non-religious, non-theological) theory: the Hebrew in the Torah is an invented language, akin to Klingon or Elvish, that was designed to write the Torah. Under this theory, the letters, words, grammar, and key terms and phrases of the Biblical language were selected, co-determined, and creatively bootstrapped as a sort of language game. The invented language may have been designed, like Esperanto or Basic English, to include elements in common with known natural languages; nevertheless, the details and final form of the language were bespoke and under the control of a creative author. In the invented system, some anagrams were defined to mean related concepts; letters were assigned number values so words and phrases could “add up to” interesting numbers (“Gematria”); and the author planned a text that would include a density of word-games like pangrams (sentences that use all letters of the alphabet), lipograms (sections of the text that are missing one particular letter), and particular numbers of letters and words throughout. However, all signs of seemingly deliberate language games might instead merely be the result of cherry picking of interesting findings. In this paper, I present analysis and new approaches that might help distinguish whether the apparent language games in the Torah imply an intentional invented language or, instead, only result from over-analysis and were not intended by the author to be present in the text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18533/JAH.V10I08.2136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18533/JAH.V10I08.2136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我提出了一个直截了当地的世俗(非宗教、非神学)理论:《托拉》中的希伯来语是一种发明的语言,类似于克林贡语或精灵语,用来书写《托拉》。在这个理论下,圣经语言的字母、单词、语法和关键术语和短语被选择、共同确定,并创造性地作为一种语言游戏来引导。像世界语或基础英语一样,被发明的语言可能被设计成包含与已知自然语言共同的元素;然而,语言的细节和最终形式是定制的,并由一位有创造力的作者控制。在发明的系统中,一些字谜被定义为表示相关的概念;字母被赋予数值,因此单词和短语可以“加起来”成为有趣的数字(“Gematria”);作者还设计了一个文本,该文本将包含大量的文字游戏,如泛图(使用字母表中所有字母的句子)、短图(缺少一个特定字母的文本部分),以及贯穿全文的特定数量的字母和单词。然而,所有看似刻意的语言游戏的迹象可能只是对有趣的发现进行挑选的结果。在本文中,我提出了分析和新的方法,可以帮助区分《律法》中明显的语言游戏是否意味着有意发明的语言,还是仅仅是过度分析的结果,而不是作者有意在文本中出现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Was Hebrew invented? : Do letter, number, and word-games in the Torah imply that Biblical Hebrew is an Invented Language?
In this paper, I present a straightforward secular (non-religious, non-theological) theory: the Hebrew in the Torah is an invented language, akin to Klingon or Elvish, that was designed to write the Torah. Under this theory, the letters, words, grammar, and key terms and phrases of the Biblical language were selected, co-determined, and creatively bootstrapped as a sort of language game. The invented language may have been designed, like Esperanto or Basic English, to include elements in common with known natural languages; nevertheless, the details and final form of the language were bespoke and under the control of a creative author. In the invented system, some anagrams were defined to mean related concepts; letters were assigned number values so words and phrases could “add up to” interesting numbers (“Gematria”); and the author planned a text that would include a density of word-games like pangrams (sentences that use all letters of the alphabet), lipograms (sections of the text that are missing one particular letter), and particular numbers of letters and words throughout. However, all signs of seemingly deliberate language games might instead merely be the result of cherry picking of interesting findings. In this paper, I present analysis and new approaches that might help distinguish whether the apparent language games in the Torah imply an intentional invented language or, instead, only result from over-analysis and were not intended by the author to be present in the text.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Influence of the Native Quota in the Organization of Local and Regional Indigenous Political Movements The Impact of Critical Thinking on Learners to Increase their Self regulate in the Education Process: An Overview Graffiti and new media: Levearaging technology to advance creativity and learning in Nigeria From a Crisis Response to Feminist Talking Circles: Reconsidering Collaborative Feedback Practices in the Digital Humanities The Crisis of Artificial Intelligence: A New Digital Humanities Curriculum for Human-Centred AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1