假谷仓和我们的认识论理论

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI:10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.02
Ángel García Rodríguez
{"title":"假谷仓和我们的认识论理论","authors":"Ángel García Rodríguez","doi":"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa epistemologia de virtudes pura se enfrenta al reto de los falsos graneros. Este articulo explica como superarlo. Asi, se constata que el experimento mental es ambiguo respecto de la habilidad visual tipicamente atribuida, o negada, a los sujetos del ejemplo. La desambiguacion muestra que dichos sujetos tienen conocimiento limitado de la proposicion relevante (v.g., que hay un granero enfrente). Esto casa con la epistemologia de virtudes pura, que predice y explica todas las intuiciones producidas por el ejemplo. Con ello se esclarece la relacion entre las nociones de conocimiento, suerte y habilidad, y se mejora nuestra teorizacion epistemologica. EnglishPure virtue epistemology faces the fake barn challenge. This paper explains how it can be met. Thus, it is argued that the thought experiment contains a hidden ambiguity concerning the visual ability typically ascribed to, or denied, fake barn subjects. Disambiguation shows fake barn subjects to have limited knowledge of the target proposition (e.g. that there is a barn ahead). This accords with a pure virtue-theoretic conception of knowledge that predicts and explains all the intuitions elicited by the thought experiment. As a result, the relationship between knowledge, luck and ability is illuminated, and our epistemological theorizing improved.","PeriodicalId":43820,"journal":{"name":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","volume":"78 1","pages":"29-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fake Barns and Our Epistemological Theorizing\",\"authors\":\"Ángel García Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolLa epistemologia de virtudes pura se enfrenta al reto de los falsos graneros. Este articulo explica como superarlo. Asi, se constata que el experimento mental es ambiguo respecto de la habilidad visual tipicamente atribuida, o negada, a los sujetos del ejemplo. La desambiguacion muestra que dichos sujetos tienen conocimiento limitado de la proposicion relevante (v.g., que hay un granero enfrente). Esto casa con la epistemologia de virtudes pura, que predice y explica todas las intuiciones producidas por el ejemplo. Con ello se esclarece la relacion entre las nociones de conocimiento, suerte y habilidad, y se mejora nuestra teorizacion epistemologica. EnglishPure virtue epistemology faces the fake barn challenge. This paper explains how it can be met. Thus, it is argued that the thought experiment contains a hidden ambiguity concerning the visual ability typically ascribed to, or denied, fake barn subjects. Disambiguation shows fake barn subjects to have limited knowledge of the target proposition (e.g. that there is a barn ahead). This accords with a pure virtue-theoretic conception of knowledge that predicts and explains all the intuitions elicited by the thought experiment. As a result, the relationship between knowledge, luck and ability is illuminated, and our epistemological theorizing improved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"29-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2018.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纯美德认识论面临着假谷仓的挑战。这篇文章解释了如何克服它。因此,心理实验对于通常归因于或否认的视觉能力是模糊的。消除歧义表明,这些受试者对相关命题的知识有限(例如,前面有一个谷仓)。这与纯美德认识论相一致,纯美德认识论预测和解释由例子产生的所有直觉。它阐明了知识、运气和能力概念之间的关系,并改进了我们的认识论理论。英国纯美德认识论面临着假牛群的挑战。这篇论文解释了它是如何实现的。因此,it is argued that the thought experiment contains a wooldridge ambiguity关于视觉能力typically ascribed to, or,举了谷仓主体的一部分。消除歧义表明,假谷仓对象对目标命题的知识有限(例如,有一个谷仓在前面)。This with a pure virtue-theoretic协定概念of knowledge that predicts and explains all the intuitions控告by the thought experiment。因此,the relationship between knowledge,运气和能力是illuminated, and our epistemological theorizing改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fake Barns and Our Epistemological Theorizing
espanolLa epistemologia de virtudes pura se enfrenta al reto de los falsos graneros. Este articulo explica como superarlo. Asi, se constata que el experimento mental es ambiguo respecto de la habilidad visual tipicamente atribuida, o negada, a los sujetos del ejemplo. La desambiguacion muestra que dichos sujetos tienen conocimiento limitado de la proposicion relevante (v.g., que hay un granero enfrente). Esto casa con la epistemologia de virtudes pura, que predice y explica todas las intuiciones producidas por el ejemplo. Con ello se esclarece la relacion entre las nociones de conocimiento, suerte y habilidad, y se mejora nuestra teorizacion epistemologica. EnglishPure virtue epistemology faces the fake barn challenge. This paper explains how it can be met. Thus, it is argued that the thought experiment contains a hidden ambiguity concerning the visual ability typically ascribed to, or denied, fake barn subjects. Disambiguation shows fake barn subjects to have limited knowledge of the target proposition (e.g. that there is a barn ahead). This accords with a pure virtue-theoretic conception of knowledge that predicts and explains all the intuitions elicited by the thought experiment. As a result, the relationship between knowledge, luck and ability is illuminated, and our epistemological theorizing improved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aesthetics of Food Porn Food, Art and Philosophy Can Food Be Art in Virtue of Its Savour Alone? Meals, Art and Meaning Términos peyorativos de grupo, estereotipos y actos de habla
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1