{"title":"ETIKA DALAM ISLAM: TELAAH KRITIS TERHADAP PEMIKIRAN IBN MISKAWAIH","authors":"Rusfian Efendi","doi":"10.14421/ref.2019.1901-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The flow of ethical thought does not stop at Western Philosophy. Ethical thinking also colors and influences the discourse of thought in Islamic Philosophy. Differences in the style of Western Philosophy and Islamic Philosophy have a significant impact that has caused a debate about the expertise and courage of a Muslim thinker in adopting Greek ethical thought by not leaving the corridors of Islamic teachings. A very striking difference is the portion of the use of ratios in the construction of thought.One such debate is the difference of opinion regarding the contribution of Ibn Miskawaih in ethical discourse. Some Muslim thinkers say that Ibn Miskawaih is an ethical figure with his main work Tahdzib al-Akhlaq, while other opinions say that he is a moral figure. Thus, this research will show Ibn Miskawaih’s thought building in deeper, so that the foundations of his thought can be seen. More broadly, this research is important to be done to clarify the realm of moral and ethical discourse that develops in Islamic Philosophy, even though Western Philosophy and Islamic Philosophy have the same universal values.This study examines the book Tahdzib al-Akhlaq which is a Ibn Miskawaih master piece. This research attempts to answer the question whether Tahdzib al- Akhlaq is an ethical or moral book. This was done by examining two works of translation of Tahdzib al-Akhlaq, namely The Refinement of Character written by Constantine K. Zurayk and Towards Moral Perfection written by Helmi Hidayat. This research is focused on tracing the arguments compiled by Ibn Miskawaih and tracking the minds of the figures that influence them.From this research it was concluded that Tahdzib al-Akhlaq was not an ethical work, but a moral work. This affirms the criticism made by Fazlur Rahman that Muslim philosophers have failed to produce logically related ethical systems.","PeriodicalId":55670,"journal":{"name":"AlAraf Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlAraf Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.2019.1901-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

伦理思想的流动并不止于西方哲学。伦理思想也影响着伊斯兰哲学的思想话语。西方哲学和伊斯兰哲学风格的差异产生了重大影响,引发了一场关于穆斯林思想家在不离开伊斯兰教义走廊的情况下采用希腊伦理思想的专业知识和勇气的辩论。一个非常显著的区别是比例在思维结构中所占的比例。其中一个争论是关于伊本·米斯卡瓦伊在伦理话语中的贡献的不同意见。一些穆斯林思想家说,伊本·米斯卡瓦伊是一位道德人物,他的主要作品是《Tahdzib al-Akhlaq》,而另一些人则说他是一位道德人物。因此,本研究将更深入地展示伊本·米斯卡瓦伊的思想建设,从而可以看到他的思想基础。更广泛地说,这项研究对于澄清伊斯兰哲学中发展的道德和伦理话语领域非常重要,尽管西方哲学和伊斯兰哲学具有相同的普遍价值观。本研究考察了伊本·米斯卡瓦伊的代表作《Tahdzib al-Akhlaq》。本研究试图回答《阿克拉克》是一本伦理或道德书籍的问题。这是通过检查Tahdzib al-Akhlaq的两本翻译作品来完成的,即Constantine K. Zurayk的《人格的精炼》和Helmi Hidayat的《走向道德完美》。这项研究的重点是追溯伊本·米斯卡瓦伊汇编的论点,并追踪影响这些论点的人物的思想。从这项研究中可以得出结论,Tahdzib al-Akhlaq不是一部伦理作品,而是一部道德作品。这证实了Fazlur Rahman的批评,即穆斯林哲学家未能产生逻辑相关的伦理体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ETIKA DALAM ISLAM: TELAAH KRITIS TERHADAP PEMIKIRAN IBN MISKAWAIH
The flow of ethical thought does not stop at Western Philosophy. Ethical thinking also colors and influences the discourse of thought in Islamic Philosophy. Differences in the style of Western Philosophy and Islamic Philosophy have a significant impact that has caused a debate about the expertise and courage of a Muslim thinker in adopting Greek ethical thought by not leaving the corridors of Islamic teachings. A very striking difference is the portion of the use of ratios in the construction of thought.One such debate is the difference of opinion regarding the contribution of Ibn Miskawaih in ethical discourse. Some Muslim thinkers say that Ibn Miskawaih is an ethical figure with his main work Tahdzib al-Akhlaq, while other opinions say that he is a moral figure. Thus, this research will show Ibn Miskawaih’s thought building in deeper, so that the foundations of his thought can be seen. More broadly, this research is important to be done to clarify the realm of moral and ethical discourse that develops in Islamic Philosophy, even though Western Philosophy and Islamic Philosophy have the same universal values.This study examines the book Tahdzib al-Akhlaq which is a Ibn Miskawaih master piece. This research attempts to answer the question whether Tahdzib al- Akhlaq is an ethical or moral book. This was done by examining two works of translation of Tahdzib al-Akhlaq, namely The Refinement of Character written by Constantine K. Zurayk and Towards Moral Perfection written by Helmi Hidayat. This research is focused on tracing the arguments compiled by Ibn Miskawaih and tracking the minds of the figures that influence them.From this research it was concluded that Tahdzib al-Akhlaq was not an ethical work, but a moral work. This affirms the criticism made by Fazlur Rahman that Muslim philosophers have failed to produce logically related ethical systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Denise Ferreira da Silva. Toward a Global Idea of Race A Critical Inquiry into Jürgen Habermas’ Hermeneutical Reflection as a Methodology of Social Science Sebuah Apresiasi terhadap Perubahan Pasal Hukuman Mati Sensus Fidei Umat Katolik di Keuskupan Agung Jakarta terhadap Isu Homoseksualitas pada Tahun 2022 Deconstruction and Religion: Exploring Derrida’s View on Religion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1