D. Darbyshire, L. Brewster, R. Isba, R. Body, D. Goodwin
{"title":"保留急诊医生:范围审查方案。","authors":"D. Darbyshire, L. Brewster, R. Isba, R. Body, D. Goodwin","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe primary question of the review is: What is known about retention of doctors in emergency medicine?\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nThere is a staffing crisis in emergency medicine and retention problems across healthcare. The evidence is disparate and includes healthcare research, management studies and policy documents from government and other agencies. Therefore there is a need to map the evidence on retention of emergency medicine doctors. This review is part of a wider study of the retention of doctors in emergency medicine situated in the UK.\n\n\nINCLUSION CRITERIA\nWe will identify papers relating to emergency medicine doctors at all levels, using the different terms used internationally for these practitioners. We will exclude papers relating to other healthcare professions. We aim to include papers relating to retention; to identify these our search will include terms such as turnover and exodus. The setting is focused on the emergency department; studies focusing on working in other settings, for example, a minor injuries unit, will be excluded. Studies from any country will be included, however we are limited to those published in English.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe will search medical literature databases including MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the British Medical Journal collection. We will supplement this by searching business and management journals including; Business Source Complete, ProQuest Business Database and Emerald Business and Management Journals. A structured iterative search of the gray literature will be conducted. Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that align with the review's objective.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"D. Darbyshire, L. Brewster, R. Isba, R. Body, D. Goodwin\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nThe primary question of the review is: What is known about retention of doctors in emergency medicine?\\n\\n\\nINTRODUCTION\\nThere is a staffing crisis in emergency medicine and retention problems across healthcare. The evidence is disparate and includes healthcare research, management studies and policy documents from government and other agencies. Therefore there is a need to map the evidence on retention of emergency medicine doctors. This review is part of a wider study of the retention of doctors in emergency medicine situated in the UK.\\n\\n\\nINCLUSION CRITERIA\\nWe will identify papers relating to emergency medicine doctors at all levels, using the different terms used internationally for these practitioners. We will exclude papers relating to other healthcare professions. We aim to include papers relating to retention; to identify these our search will include terms such as turnover and exodus. The setting is focused on the emergency department; studies focusing on working in other settings, for example, a minor injuries unit, will be excluded. Studies from any country will be included, however we are limited to those published in English.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe will search medical literature databases including MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the British Medical Journal collection. We will supplement this by searching business and management journals including; Business Source Complete, ProQuest Business Database and Emerald Business and Management Journals. A structured iterative search of the gray literature will be conducted. Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that align with the review's objective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
目的:本综述的主要问题是:关于急诊医学医生的保留情况我们知道些什么?在急诊医学和保留问题在整个医疗保健人员的危机。证据各不相同,包括医疗保健研究、管理研究以及政府和其他机构的政策文件。因此,有必要绘制关于急诊医生保留的证据图。这篇综述是对英国急诊医学医生保留情况的更广泛研究的一部分。入选标准我们将确定与各级急诊医生有关的论文,使用国际上对这些医生使用的不同术语。我们将排除与其他医疗保健专业相关的论文。我们的目标是包括与保留有关的论文;为了确定这些,我们的搜索将包括营业额和外流等术语。设置集中在急诊科;侧重于在其他环境下工作的研究,例如,轻伤部门,将被排除在外。来自任何国家的研究都将包括在内,但我们仅限于用英语发表的研究。方法检索医学文献数据库,包括MEDLINE、Embase、HMIC、PsycINFO、Cochrane系统评价数据库和British medical Journal collection。我们将通过搜索商业和管理期刊来补充这一点,包括;商业来源完整,ProQuest商业数据库和翡翠商业和管理期刊。将对灰色文献进行结构化的迭代搜索。检索到的论文将由两名审稿人筛选纳入。数据将被提取并以表格形式和符合审查目标的叙述性摘要呈现。
Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol.
OBJECTIVE
The primary question of the review is: What is known about retention of doctors in emergency medicine?
INTRODUCTION
There is a staffing crisis in emergency medicine and retention problems across healthcare. The evidence is disparate and includes healthcare research, management studies and policy documents from government and other agencies. Therefore there is a need to map the evidence on retention of emergency medicine doctors. This review is part of a wider study of the retention of doctors in emergency medicine situated in the UK.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
We will identify papers relating to emergency medicine doctors at all levels, using the different terms used internationally for these practitioners. We will exclude papers relating to other healthcare professions. We aim to include papers relating to retention; to identify these our search will include terms such as turnover and exodus. The setting is focused on the emergency department; studies focusing on working in other settings, for example, a minor injuries unit, will be excluded. Studies from any country will be included, however we are limited to those published in English.
METHODS
We will search medical literature databases including MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the British Medical Journal collection. We will supplement this by searching business and management journals including; Business Source Complete, ProQuest Business Database and Emerald Business and Management Journals. A structured iterative search of the gray literature will be conducted. Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that align with the review's objective.