基于税收特定与一般会计的文本分析及其与有效税率的关系:构建语境

Tax eJournal Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3684838
Eric J. Allen, D. O’Leary, Hao Qu, Charles W. Swenson
{"title":"基于税收特定与一般会计的文本分析及其与有效税率的关系:构建语境","authors":"Eric J. Allen, D. O’Leary, Hao Qu, Charles W. Swenson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3684838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A growing literature, typically using “bags of words” dictionaries, examines the information content of text in financial accounting disclosures. We generate context for our text analysis to help predict effective tax rates using two approaches. First, we create tax-specific, expert-derived, dictionaries and, second, we generate the counts for those bags of words using text taken from tax-related discussions of the Form 10-K, as opposed to its entirety. We find that using expertise provides more information than simply using general accounting and finance dictionaries. In addition, we find that generating general accounting text variable values from tax-related content in the Form 10-K provides statistically significant improvement in model fit. Contrary to more generic accounting and finance word-based text analysis, we find that the signs on our positive and negative tax event dictionaries are different and are consistent with theoretical expectations through each of our modeled time periods.","PeriodicalId":22313,"journal":{"name":"Tax eJournal","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax Specific Versus Generic Accounting-Based Textual Analysis and the Relationship with Effective Tax Rates: Building Context\",\"authors\":\"Eric J. Allen, D. O’Leary, Hao Qu, Charles W. Swenson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3684838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A growing literature, typically using “bags of words” dictionaries, examines the information content of text in financial accounting disclosures. We generate context for our text analysis to help predict effective tax rates using two approaches. First, we create tax-specific, expert-derived, dictionaries and, second, we generate the counts for those bags of words using text taken from tax-related discussions of the Form 10-K, as opposed to its entirety. We find that using expertise provides more information than simply using general accounting and finance dictionaries. In addition, we find that generating general accounting text variable values from tax-related content in the Form 10-K provides statistically significant improvement in model fit. Contrary to more generic accounting and finance word-based text analysis, we find that the signs on our positive and negative tax event dictionaries are different and are consistent with theoretical expectations through each of our modeled time periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tax eJournal\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tax eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

越来越多的文献,通常使用“词汇袋”字典,检查财务会计披露文本的信息内容。我们使用两种方法为文本分析生成上下文,以帮助预测有效税率。首先,我们创建专门针对税收的、专家派生的词典;其次,我们使用从10-K表格中与税收相关的讨论中提取的文本,而不是完整的文本,生成这些单词的计数。我们发现,使用专业知识比简单地使用一般会计和财务词典提供更多的信息。此外,我们发现从10-K表格中与税收相关的内容生成一般会计文本变量值在模型拟合方面提供了统计上显著的改进。与更通用的会计和金融基于单词的文本分析相反,我们发现我们的正面和负面税收事件字典上的标志是不同的,并且通过我们的每个建模时间段与理论预期一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tax Specific Versus Generic Accounting-Based Textual Analysis and the Relationship with Effective Tax Rates: Building Context
A growing literature, typically using “bags of words” dictionaries, examines the information content of text in financial accounting disclosures. We generate context for our text analysis to help predict effective tax rates using two approaches. First, we create tax-specific, expert-derived, dictionaries and, second, we generate the counts for those bags of words using text taken from tax-related discussions of the Form 10-K, as opposed to its entirety. We find that using expertise provides more information than simply using general accounting and finance dictionaries. In addition, we find that generating general accounting text variable values from tax-related content in the Form 10-K provides statistically significant improvement in model fit. Contrary to more generic accounting and finance word-based text analysis, we find that the signs on our positive and negative tax event dictionaries are different and are consistent with theoretical expectations through each of our modeled time periods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Puzzles in International Tax Agreements Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecast quality Workplace Transformation and Its Tax Compliance Implications Consumption Taxes and Multinational Tax Planning in the Digital Age - Evidence from the European Service Sector Tax Avoidance and Equity Pricing: The Importance of Countries’ Legal Institutions and Disclosure Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1