新西兰克马德克弧兄弟海底火山的热液羽流监测二十年

IF 5.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Economic Geology Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.5382/econgeo.4998
S. Walker, C. D. de Ronde
{"title":"新西兰克马德克弧兄弟海底火山的热液羽流监测二十年","authors":"S. Walker, C. D. de Ronde","doi":"10.5382/econgeo.4998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Brothers volcano is arguably the most well-studied submarine arc volcano on Earth. Between 1996, when massive sulfides were first recovered by dredging, and 2018, when International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 376 recovered cores from as deep as 453 m below the sea floor at two chemically distinct hydrothermal upflow zones, over 60 conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) vertical casts and tow-yo operations mapped hydrothermal plumes over and around the edifice by employing hydrothermal tracer-specific sensors. These surveys started in 1999 and were completed during nine separate expeditions at one- to three-year intervals, except for a six-year gap between 2011 and 2017. Hydrothermal plume distributions over this two-decade period show variability in the intensity and vertical rise height of plumes from the four main vent fields (Upper Cone, Lower Cone, NW Caldera, and Upper Caldera, with the latter not discovered until 2017). Upper Cone plumes were more intense than all other sites in 1999, 2002, 2007, and 2009, then significantly diminished from 2011 to 2018. The Lower Cone plume was the most intense in 2004, then the NW Caldera site became the dominant source of hydrothermal particles from 2011 to 2018. Despite the gap of six years between 2011 and 2017, hydrothermal output appears to have increased within the caldera sometime after the 2009 survey while simultaneously decreasing in intensity at the cone sites. This supports other evidence of linkages between the cone and caldera sites in the deep hydrothermal circulation system, and may be related to the predicted deepening of hydrothermal circulation, infiltration of seawater to facilitate “mining” of magmatic brines, and modulation of subseafloor mineralization processes associated with a modeled, pulsed injection of magmatic gasses. The surveys also revealed ways in which the highly variable regional hydrographic environment impacts the flux of hydrothermal products to the surrounding ocean. Plumes from sources located above the caldera rim disperse hydrothermal components without hindrance, but particles and heat from sources within the caldera become trapped and are dispersed episodically by caldera-flushing events. While on site for 18 days in 2018, repeat CTD casts into the deepest part of the caldera, which was isolated from the surrounding ocean, showed a progressive increase in temperature, representing a net heat flux of 79 MW from conductive and advective sources deeper than 1,570 m.","PeriodicalId":11469,"journal":{"name":"Economic Geology","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Decades of Monitoring Hydrothermal Plumes at the Brothers Submarine Volcano, Kermadec Arc, New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"S. Walker, C. D. de Ronde\",\"doi\":\"10.5382/econgeo.4998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Brothers volcano is arguably the most well-studied submarine arc volcano on Earth. Between 1996, when massive sulfides were first recovered by dredging, and 2018, when International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 376 recovered cores from as deep as 453 m below the sea floor at two chemically distinct hydrothermal upflow zones, over 60 conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) vertical casts and tow-yo operations mapped hydrothermal plumes over and around the edifice by employing hydrothermal tracer-specific sensors. These surveys started in 1999 and were completed during nine separate expeditions at one- to three-year intervals, except for a six-year gap between 2011 and 2017. Hydrothermal plume distributions over this two-decade period show variability in the intensity and vertical rise height of plumes from the four main vent fields (Upper Cone, Lower Cone, NW Caldera, and Upper Caldera, with the latter not discovered until 2017). Upper Cone plumes were more intense than all other sites in 1999, 2002, 2007, and 2009, then significantly diminished from 2011 to 2018. The Lower Cone plume was the most intense in 2004, then the NW Caldera site became the dominant source of hydrothermal particles from 2011 to 2018. Despite the gap of six years between 2011 and 2017, hydrothermal output appears to have increased within the caldera sometime after the 2009 survey while simultaneously decreasing in intensity at the cone sites. This supports other evidence of linkages between the cone and caldera sites in the deep hydrothermal circulation system, and may be related to the predicted deepening of hydrothermal circulation, infiltration of seawater to facilitate “mining” of magmatic brines, and modulation of subseafloor mineralization processes associated with a modeled, pulsed injection of magmatic gasses. The surveys also revealed ways in which the highly variable regional hydrographic environment impacts the flux of hydrothermal products to the surrounding ocean. Plumes from sources located above the caldera rim disperse hydrothermal components without hindrance, but particles and heat from sources within the caldera become trapped and are dispersed episodically by caldera-flushing events. While on site for 18 days in 2018, repeat CTD casts into the deepest part of the caldera, which was isolated from the surrounding ocean, showed a progressive increase in temperature, representing a net heat flux of 79 MW from conductive and advective sources deeper than 1,570 m.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Geology\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.4998\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.4998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

兄弟火山可以说是地球上研究得最充分的海底弧火山。1996年,当通过疏通首次回收大量硫化物时,到2018年,当国际海洋发现计划(IODP)第376次考察在两个化学上不同的热液上升流区从海底以下453米深处回收岩芯时,超过60个电导率-温度-深度(CTD)垂直模型和拖缆作业通过使用热液示踪剂特定传感器绘制了建筑物周围和周围的热液羽流。这些调查始于1999年,除了2011年至2017年之间的6年间隔外,每隔一到三年进行9次单独的考察。在这20年的时间里,热液羽流分布显示了来自四个主要火山口(上锥、下锥、西北火山口和上火山口,后者直到2017年才被发现)的羽流强度和垂直上升高度的变化。1999年、2002年、2007年和2009年,上锥羽流比其他所有地点都要强烈,然后从2011年到2018年显著减少。2004年,下锥柱最强烈,然后从2011年到2018年,西北火山口遗址成为热液颗粒的主要来源。尽管2011年至2017年之间有6年的间隔,但在2009年调查之后的某个时候,火山口内的热液输出似乎有所增加,而锥点的强度却在下降。这支持了深部热液循环系统中锥和破火山口位置之间联系的其他证据,并且可能与预测的热液循环加深、海水渗透以促进岩浆盐水的“开采”以及与模拟的脉冲岩浆气体注入相关的海底矿化过程的调节有关。这些调查还揭示了高度变化的区域水文环境如何影响热液产品向周围海洋的通量。来自火山口边缘上方来源的羽流毫无阻碍地分散了热液成分,但来自火山口内部来源的颗粒和热量被困住,并在火山口冲刷事件中偶尔分散。在2018年的18天现场,重复CTD浇铸到火山口的最深处,与周围的海洋隔离,显示温度逐渐增加,代表79兆瓦的净热通量,来自1570米以下的导电和流源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two Decades of Monitoring Hydrothermal Plumes at the Brothers Submarine Volcano, Kermadec Arc, New Zealand
Brothers volcano is arguably the most well-studied submarine arc volcano on Earth. Between 1996, when massive sulfides were first recovered by dredging, and 2018, when International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 376 recovered cores from as deep as 453 m below the sea floor at two chemically distinct hydrothermal upflow zones, over 60 conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) vertical casts and tow-yo operations mapped hydrothermal plumes over and around the edifice by employing hydrothermal tracer-specific sensors. These surveys started in 1999 and were completed during nine separate expeditions at one- to three-year intervals, except for a six-year gap between 2011 and 2017. Hydrothermal plume distributions over this two-decade period show variability in the intensity and vertical rise height of plumes from the four main vent fields (Upper Cone, Lower Cone, NW Caldera, and Upper Caldera, with the latter not discovered until 2017). Upper Cone plumes were more intense than all other sites in 1999, 2002, 2007, and 2009, then significantly diminished from 2011 to 2018. The Lower Cone plume was the most intense in 2004, then the NW Caldera site became the dominant source of hydrothermal particles from 2011 to 2018. Despite the gap of six years between 2011 and 2017, hydrothermal output appears to have increased within the caldera sometime after the 2009 survey while simultaneously decreasing in intensity at the cone sites. This supports other evidence of linkages between the cone and caldera sites in the deep hydrothermal circulation system, and may be related to the predicted deepening of hydrothermal circulation, infiltration of seawater to facilitate “mining” of magmatic brines, and modulation of subseafloor mineralization processes associated with a modeled, pulsed injection of magmatic gasses. The surveys also revealed ways in which the highly variable regional hydrographic environment impacts the flux of hydrothermal products to the surrounding ocean. Plumes from sources located above the caldera rim disperse hydrothermal components without hindrance, but particles and heat from sources within the caldera become trapped and are dispersed episodically by caldera-flushing events. While on site for 18 days in 2018, repeat CTD casts into the deepest part of the caldera, which was isolated from the surrounding ocean, showed a progressive increase in temperature, representing a net heat flux of 79 MW from conductive and advective sources deeper than 1,570 m.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Geology
Economic Geology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal, now published semi-quarterly, was first published in 1905 by the Economic Geology Publishing Company (PUBCO), a not-for-profit company established for the purpose of publishing a periodical devoted to economic geology. On the founding of SEG in 1920, a cooperative arrangement between PUBCO and SEG made the journal the official organ of the Society, and PUBCO agreed to carry the Society''s name on the front cover under the heading "Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists". PUBCO and SEG continued to operate as cooperating but separate entities until 2001, when the Board of Directors of PUBCO and the Council of SEG, by unanimous consent, approved a formal agreement of merger. The former activities of the PUBCO Board of Directors are now carried out by a Publications Board, a new self-governing unit within SEG.
期刊最新文献
Cu-Au-Platinum Group Element Mineralization in the Mbesa Prospect, Southern Tanzania: Unconventional Magmatic Sulfides Epithermal Gold Discoveries in the Emerging Khundii Metallogenic Province, Southwest Mongolia Discriminating Superimposed Alteration Associated with Epigenetic Base and Precious Metal Vein Systems in the Rouyn-Noranda Mining District, Quebec; Implications for Exploration in Ancient Volcanic Districts Zircon and Whole-Rock Trace Element Indicators of Magmatic Hydration State and Oxidation State Discriminate Copper Ore-Forming from Barren Arc Magmas PLUME-GENERATED 90° STRESS CHANGE LINKED TO TRANSITION FROM RADIATING TO CIRCUMFERENTIAL DOLERITE DIKE SWARMS OF THE SIBERIAN TRAPS LARGE IGNEOUS PROVINCE AND TO EMPLACEMENT OF THE NORILSK-TALNAKH ORE DEPOSITS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1