戏剧中的情感、理性和道德参与

IF 0.5 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance Pub Date : 1996-09-01 DOI:10.1080/1356978960010204
J. Winston
{"title":"戏剧中的情感、理性和道德参与","authors":"J. Winston","doi":"10.1080/1356978960010204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, there has been renewed interest in Aristotelian or neo‐Aristotelian theory within the field of the human sciences. This article is an attempt to begin a reassessment of whether such an interest is appropriate for drama teachers. It begins with a critique of the objections to Aristotelian theatre raised by Brecht and Boal, two of the theorists who most influence educational drama. It proceeds to focus upon the cognitive nature of emotion and, in particular, upon how this relationship can inform our understanding of catharsis. Drawing upon the work, of Martha Nussbaum, I argue that catharsis is more accurately viewed as a process of cognitive illumination through the emotions rather than as one of purgation or political repression. Reflecting upon the significance of this for drama teachers, I propose that Beckerman's theory of iconic and dialectic action presents us with a perspective of moral engagement in drama which permits teachers to be informed by Brecht, Boal and Aristotle.","PeriodicalId":45609,"journal":{"name":"Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance","volume":"15 1","pages":"189-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotion, Reason and Moral Engagement in Drama\",\"authors\":\"J. Winston\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1356978960010204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In recent years, there has been renewed interest in Aristotelian or neo‐Aristotelian theory within the field of the human sciences. This article is an attempt to begin a reassessment of whether such an interest is appropriate for drama teachers. It begins with a critique of the objections to Aristotelian theatre raised by Brecht and Boal, two of the theorists who most influence educational drama. It proceeds to focus upon the cognitive nature of emotion and, in particular, upon how this relationship can inform our understanding of catharsis. Drawing upon the work, of Martha Nussbaum, I argue that catharsis is more accurately viewed as a process of cognitive illumination through the emotions rather than as one of purgation or political repression. Reflecting upon the significance of this for drama teachers, I propose that Beckerman's theory of iconic and dialectic action presents us with a perspective of moral engagement in drama which permits teachers to be informed by Brecht, Boal and Aristotle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"189-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1356978960010204\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1356978960010204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

近年来,在人文科学领域,亚里士多德或新亚里士多德理论重新引起了人们的兴趣。本文试图重新评估这种兴趣是否适合戏剧教师。它以对布莱希特和波尔提出的反对亚里士多德戏剧的批评开始,这两位理论家对教育戏剧影响最大。它继续关注情感的认知本质,特别是这种关系如何影响我们对情感宣泄的理解。根据玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum)的作品,我认为更准确地说,宣泄应该被视为一种通过情感进行认知启蒙的过程,而不是一种净化或政治压制。在反思这对戏剧教师的意义时,我提出贝克曼的标志性和辩证法行动理论为我们提供了戏剧道德参与的视角,这使得教师可以从布莱希特、波尔和亚里士多德那里得到启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emotion, Reason and Moral Engagement in Drama
Abstract In recent years, there has been renewed interest in Aristotelian or neo‐Aristotelian theory within the field of the human sciences. This article is an attempt to begin a reassessment of whether such an interest is appropriate for drama teachers. It begins with a critique of the objections to Aristotelian theatre raised by Brecht and Boal, two of the theorists who most influence educational drama. It proceeds to focus upon the cognitive nature of emotion and, in particular, upon how this relationship can inform our understanding of catharsis. Drawing upon the work, of Martha Nussbaum, I argue that catharsis is more accurately viewed as a process of cognitive illumination through the emotions rather than as one of purgation or political repression. Reflecting upon the significance of this for drama teachers, I propose that Beckerman's theory of iconic and dialectic action presents us with a perspective of moral engagement in drama which permits teachers to be informed by Brecht, Boal and Aristotle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Taking a Larger Slice of the Pie: a response to the article ‘Bears don't need phonics’ An Engaging Assessment in Early Years Drams The winning postgraduate short article. The playwright's workshop as action research : a case study Come Back to the Text, Shirley. A Response to ‘Bears don't need phonics: an examination of the role of drama in laying the foundations for critical thinking in reading’ (RIDE, 4.1) Inhlanzi Ishelwe Amanzi‐As Fish Out of Water: finding authentic voices in a multicultural student production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1