戏剧教育学与双重意义艺术

IF 0.5 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance Pub Date : 1997-09-01 DOI:10.1080/1356978970020205
J. Simons
{"title":"戏剧教育学与双重意义艺术","authors":"J. Simons","doi":"10.1080/1356978970020205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Drama has traditionally sought ways to unite differences in a common expression, but this purpose is challenged by multiculturalism and the need to respect rather than erase different subjectivities in order to ensure equity” in education. This article suggests that an artistic holding form which has as its essence ambiguity could serve to recruit difference and allow for the establishment of a more just ‘cohesive sociality’. The tolerance of ambiguity is one feature of creativity, and this paper explores ways that cognitive and affective meaning can be enhanced by sustaining, rather than attempting to eliminate multiple ways of seeing.","PeriodicalId":45609,"journal":{"name":"Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drama Pedagogy and the Art of Double Meaning\",\"authors\":\"J. Simons\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1356978970020205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Drama has traditionally sought ways to unite differences in a common expression, but this purpose is challenged by multiculturalism and the need to respect rather than erase different subjectivities in order to ensure equity” in education. This article suggests that an artistic holding form which has as its essence ambiguity could serve to recruit difference and allow for the establishment of a more just ‘cohesive sociality’. The tolerance of ambiguity is one feature of creativity, and this paper explores ways that cognitive and affective meaning can be enhanced by sustaining, rather than attempting to eliminate multiple ways of seeing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1356978970020205\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ride-The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1356978970020205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

传统上,戏剧寻求用一种共同的表达方式来统一差异,但这一目的受到多元文化主义的挑战,需要尊重而不是消除不同的主体性,以确保教育公平。本文认为,一种本质上具有模糊性的艺术形式可以用来吸收差异,并允许建立一个更公正的“凝聚力社会”。对歧义的容忍是创造力的一个特征,本文探讨了通过维持而不是试图消除多种观看方式来增强认知和情感意义的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drama Pedagogy and the Art of Double Meaning
Abstract Drama has traditionally sought ways to unite differences in a common expression, but this purpose is challenged by multiculturalism and the need to respect rather than erase different subjectivities in order to ensure equity” in education. This article suggests that an artistic holding form which has as its essence ambiguity could serve to recruit difference and allow for the establishment of a more just ‘cohesive sociality’. The tolerance of ambiguity is one feature of creativity, and this paper explores ways that cognitive and affective meaning can be enhanced by sustaining, rather than attempting to eliminate multiple ways of seeing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Taking a Larger Slice of the Pie: a response to the article ‘Bears don't need phonics’ An Engaging Assessment in Early Years Drams The winning postgraduate short article. The playwright's workshop as action research : a case study Come Back to the Text, Shirley. A Response to ‘Bears don't need phonics: an examination of the role of drama in laying the foundations for critical thinking in reading’ (RIDE, 4.1) Inhlanzi Ishelwe Amanzi‐As Fish Out of Water: finding authentic voices in a multicultural student production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1