互动和平等。建构类型理论的对话解释

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA Pub Date : 2017-10-31 DOI:10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2017.199
Shahid Rahman, Nicolas Clerbout, Juan Redmond
{"title":"互动和平等。建构类型理论的对话解释","authors":"Shahid Rahman, Nicolas Clerbout, Juan Redmond","doi":"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2017.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolMediante un estudio dialogico de la nocion de igualdad definicional de la teoria constructiva de tipos (TCT), se mostrara que tal igualdad, que en la TCT provee el criterio de identidad asociado a un tipo, puede comprenderse, desde el punto de vista ludico, como resultado de una forma especifica de interaccion dialogica regida por la regla formal, mas conocida recientemente como la regla socratica, que prescribe el uso de jugadas de espejo (copy-cat moves). Esto se ilustrara con el desarrollo dialogico de las partes esenciales de la demostracion del axioma de eleccion de Per Martin-Lof, quien baso su prueba en la igualdad definicional entre la funcion que prueba el antecedente y la funcion que ocurre en el consecuente. EnglishThe main aim of the present paper is to show, by means of a dialogical study, that the notion of judgemental equality of Constructive Type Theory (CTT), which in this theory furnishes the criterion of identity of a type, can be understood from the game-theoretical point of view as the result of a specific form of dialogical interaction governed by the development rule known as formal rule or (more recently) Socratic rule, which prescribes the use of copy-cat moves. It will be shown, as an example, how to develop the core of a winning strategy for Per Martin-Lof’s demonstration of the Axiom of Choice, who based his proof in the judgemental equality between the function in the antecedent and the function occurring in the consequent of the axiom.","PeriodicalId":43820,"journal":{"name":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","volume":"119 1","pages":"49-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interacción e igualdad. La interpretación dialógica de la teoría constructiva de tipos\",\"authors\":\"Shahid Rahman, Nicolas Clerbout, Juan Redmond\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2017.199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolMediante un estudio dialogico de la nocion de igualdad definicional de la teoria constructiva de tipos (TCT), se mostrara que tal igualdad, que en la TCT provee el criterio de identidad asociado a un tipo, puede comprenderse, desde el punto de vista ludico, como resultado de una forma especifica de interaccion dialogica regida por la regla formal, mas conocida recientemente como la regla socratica, que prescribe el uso de jugadas de espejo (copy-cat moves). Esto se ilustrara con el desarrollo dialogico de las partes esenciales de la demostracion del axioma de eleccion de Per Martin-Lof, quien baso su prueba en la igualdad definicional entre la funcion que prueba el antecedente y la funcion que ocurre en el consecuente. EnglishThe main aim of the present paper is to show, by means of a dialogical study, that the notion of judgemental equality of Constructive Type Theory (CTT), which in this theory furnishes the criterion of identity of a type, can be understood from the game-theoretical point of view as the result of a specific form of dialogical interaction governed by the development rule known as formal rule or (more recently) Socratic rule, which prescribes the use of copy-cat moves. It will be shown, as an example, how to develop the core of a winning strategy for Per Martin-Lof’s demonstration of the Axiom of Choice, who based his proof in the judgemental equality between the function in the antecedent and the function occurring in the consequent of the axiom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"49-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2017.199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2017.199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

espanolMediante dialogico研究nocion建设性definicional平等理论类型(TCT),负债,这样的平等身份,在TCT提供标准类型相关联,可以了解从ludico的观点,由于一种方式指定interaccion dialogica由正式的规则,但最近称为socratica法则,规定使用镜像戏剧(copy-cat moves)。这将通过Per Martin-Lof证明选择公理的基本部分的对话发展来说明,他的证明基于证明先行词的函数和发生在结果中的函数之间的定义相等。EnglishThe主要aim is to show of the目前paper, by means of a dialogical study, that the notion of judgemental equality of Type建设性Theory(科技委),which in this Theory furnishes the雅典of identity of a Type, can be不言而喻,from the game-theoretical point of view the公诉机关的具体form of dialogical interaction受by the development rule正式任命rule or more惧)Socratic rule, which prescribes the use of copy-cat moves。It will be,作为示例,how to会议应为the core of a trial)战略Per Martin-Lof’s demonstration of the Axiom of Choice,基础proof in the judgemental equality between the function in the antecedent and the function occurring in the consequent of the Axiom。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interacción e igualdad. La interpretación dialógica de la teoría constructiva de tipos
espanolMediante un estudio dialogico de la nocion de igualdad definicional de la teoria constructiva de tipos (TCT), se mostrara que tal igualdad, que en la TCT provee el criterio de identidad asociado a un tipo, puede comprenderse, desde el punto de vista ludico, como resultado de una forma especifica de interaccion dialogica regida por la regla formal, mas conocida recientemente como la regla socratica, que prescribe el uso de jugadas de espejo (copy-cat moves). Esto se ilustrara con el desarrollo dialogico de las partes esenciales de la demostracion del axioma de eleccion de Per Martin-Lof, quien baso su prueba en la igualdad definicional entre la funcion que prueba el antecedente y la funcion que ocurre en el consecuente. EnglishThe main aim of the present paper is to show, by means of a dialogical study, that the notion of judgemental equality of Constructive Type Theory (CTT), which in this theory furnishes the criterion of identity of a type, can be understood from the game-theoretical point of view as the result of a specific form of dialogical interaction governed by the development rule known as formal rule or (more recently) Socratic rule, which prescribes the use of copy-cat moves. It will be shown, as an example, how to develop the core of a winning strategy for Per Martin-Lof’s demonstration of the Axiom of Choice, who based his proof in the judgemental equality between the function in the antecedent and the function occurring in the consequent of the axiom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aesthetics of Food Porn Food, Art and Philosophy Can Food Be Art in Virtue of Its Savour Alone? Meals, Art and Meaning Términos peyorativos de grupo, estereotipos y actos de habla
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1