唾液抗原检测SARS-CoV-2组粒

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of clinical virology plus Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100109
Kaoru Murakami , Sumio Iwasaki , Satoshi Oguri , Kumiko Tanaka , Rigel Suzuki , Kasumi Hayasaka , Shinichi Fujisawa , Chiaki Watanabe , Satoshi Konno , Isao Yokota , Takasuke Fukuhara , Masaaki Murakami , Takanori Teshima
{"title":"唾液抗原检测SARS-CoV-2组粒","authors":"Kaoru Murakami ,&nbsp;Sumio Iwasaki ,&nbsp;Satoshi Oguri ,&nbsp;Kumiko Tanaka ,&nbsp;Rigel Suzuki ,&nbsp;Kasumi Hayasaka ,&nbsp;Shinichi Fujisawa ,&nbsp;Chiaki Watanabe ,&nbsp;Satoshi Konno ,&nbsp;Isao Yokota ,&nbsp;Takasuke Fukuhara ,&nbsp;Masaaki Murakami ,&nbsp;Takanori Teshima","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Omicron emerged in November 2021 and became the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant globally. It spreads more rapidly than ancestral lineages and its rapid detection is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) yield results more quickly than standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR). However, their utility for the detection of the Omicron variant remains unclear. We herein evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA in saliva from 51 patients with Omicron and 60 PCR negative individuals. The sensitivity and specificity of CLEIA were 98.0% (95%CI: 89.6–100.0%) and 100.0% (95%CI: 94.0–100.0%), respectively, with fine correlation with cycle threshold (Ct) values. The sensitivity and specificity of ICA were 58.8% (95%CI: 44.2-72.4%) and 100.0% (95%CI: 94.0–100.0%), respectively. The sensitivity of ICA was 100.0% (95%CI: 80.5–100.0%) when PCR Ct was less than 25. The Omicron can be efficiently detected in saliva by CLEIA. ICA also detects high viral load Omicron using saliva.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472459/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARS-CoV-2 Omicron detection by antigen tests using saliva\",\"authors\":\"Kaoru Murakami ,&nbsp;Sumio Iwasaki ,&nbsp;Satoshi Oguri ,&nbsp;Kumiko Tanaka ,&nbsp;Rigel Suzuki ,&nbsp;Kasumi Hayasaka ,&nbsp;Shinichi Fujisawa ,&nbsp;Chiaki Watanabe ,&nbsp;Satoshi Konno ,&nbsp;Isao Yokota ,&nbsp;Takasuke Fukuhara ,&nbsp;Masaaki Murakami ,&nbsp;Takanori Teshima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Omicron emerged in November 2021 and became the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant globally. It spreads more rapidly than ancestral lineages and its rapid detection is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) yield results more quickly than standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR). However, their utility for the detection of the Omicron variant remains unclear. We herein evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA in saliva from 51 patients with Omicron and 60 PCR negative individuals. The sensitivity and specificity of CLEIA were 98.0% (95%CI: 89.6–100.0%) and 100.0% (95%CI: 94.0–100.0%), respectively, with fine correlation with cycle threshold (Ct) values. The sensitivity and specificity of ICA were 58.8% (95%CI: 44.2-72.4%) and 100.0% (95%CI: 94.0–100.0%), respectively. The sensitivity of ICA was 100.0% (95%CI: 80.5–100.0%) when PCR Ct was less than 25. The Omicron can be efficiently detected in saliva by CLEIA. ICA also detects high viral load Omicron using saliva.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical virology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

欧米克隆于2021年11月出现,成为全球主要的SARS-CoV-2变种。它的传播速度比祖先谱系更快,它的快速检测对于预防疾病暴发至关重要。抗原测试,如免疫层析分析(ICA)和化学发光酶免疫分析(CLEIA)产生的结果比标准聚合酶链反应(PCR)更快。然而,它们在检测欧米克隆变异方面的作用尚不清楚。我们在此评估了51例Omicron患者和60例PCR阴性个体唾液中ICA和CLEIA的性能。CLEIA的敏感性和特异性分别为98.0% (95%CI: 89.6 ~ 100.0%)和100.0% (95%CI: 94.0 ~ 100.0%),与周期阈值(Ct)值有良好的相关性。ICA的敏感性为58.8% (95%CI: 44.2 ~ 72.4%),特异性为100.0% (95%CI: 94.0 ~ 100.0%)。当PCR Ct小于25时,ICA的敏感性为100.0% (95%CI: 80.5 ~ 100.0%)。用CLEIA法可以有效地检测唾液中的Omicron。ICA还可以利用唾液检测高病毒载量的Omicron。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron detection by antigen tests using saliva

The Omicron emerged in November 2021 and became the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant globally. It spreads more rapidly than ancestral lineages and its rapid detection is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) yield results more quickly than standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR). However, their utility for the detection of the Omicron variant remains unclear. We herein evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA in saliva from 51 patients with Omicron and 60 PCR negative individuals. The sensitivity and specificity of CLEIA were 98.0% (95%CI: 89.6–100.0%) and 100.0% (95%CI: 94.0–100.0%), respectively, with fine correlation with cycle threshold (Ct) values. The sensitivity and specificity of ICA were 58.8% (95%CI: 44.2-72.4%) and 100.0% (95%CI: 94.0–100.0%), respectively. The sensitivity of ICA was 100.0% (95%CI: 80.5–100.0%) when PCR Ct was less than 25. The Omicron can be efficiently detected in saliva by CLEIA. ICA also detects high viral load Omicron using saliva.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical virology plus
Journal of clinical virology plus Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of the Qiagen BK virus ASR on the NeuMoDx system Correlation of cytokine storm with ocular fundus abnormalities in critically ill patients with severe viral pneumonia A prospective study to evaluate the clinical specificity of the cobas® MPX test kit for screening for HIV RNA, HCV RNA, and HBV DNA in blood donation samples using the cobas® 6800 system in HBV endemic areas A rapid review of the epidemiology and combating strategies of hepatitis C virus infection in Ghana Serologic evidence of dengue and chikungunya among patients with acute febrile illness in Ghana, 2016 – 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1