含有非天然氨基酸序列的计算机免疫原性评估:一种使用现有计算机算法基础设施的方法和未来增强的愿景。

Aimee E Mattei, Andres H Gutierrez, William D Martin, Frances E Terry, Brian J Roberts, Amy S Rosenberg, Anne S De Groot
{"title":"含有非天然氨基酸序列的计算机免疫原性评估:一种使用现有计算机算法基础设施的方法和未来增强的愿景。","authors":"Aimee E Mattei,&nbsp;Andres H Gutierrez,&nbsp;William D Martin,&nbsp;Frances E Terry,&nbsp;Brian J Roberts,&nbsp;Amy S Rosenberg,&nbsp;Anne S De Groot","doi":"10.3389/fddsv.2022.952326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>in silico</i> prediction of T cell epitopes within any peptide or biologic drug candidate serves as an important first step for assessing immunogenicity. T cell epitopes bind human leukocyte antigen (HLA) by a well-characterized interaction of amino acid side chains and pockets in the HLA molecule binding groove. Immunoinformatics tools, such as the EpiMatrix algorithm, have been developed to screen natural amino acid sequences for peptides that will bind HLA. In addition to commonly occurring in synthetic peptide impurities, unnatural amino acids (UAA) are also often incorporated into novel peptide therapeutics to improve properties of the drug product. To date, the HLA binding properties of peptides containing UAA are not accurately estimated by most algorithms. Both scenarios warrant the need for enhanced predictive tools. The authors developed an <i>in silico</i> method for modeling the impact of a given UAA on a peptide's likelihood of binding to HLA and, by extension, its immunogenic potential. <i>In silico</i> assessment of immunogenic potential allows for risk-based selection of best candidate peptides in further confirmatory <i>in vitro, ex vivo</i> and <i>in vivo</i> assays, thereby reducing the overall cost of immunogenicity evaluation. Examples demonstrating <i>in silico</i> immunogenicity prediction for product impurities that are commonly found in formulations of the generic peptides teriparatide and semaglutide are provided. Next, this article discusses how HLA binding studies can be used to estimate the binding potentials of commonly encountered UAA and \"correct\" <i>in silico</i> estimates of binding based on their naturally occurring counterparts. As demonstrated here, these in vitro binding studies are usually performed with known ligands which have been modified to contain UAA in HLA anchor positions. An example using D-amino acids in relative binding position 1 (P1) of the PADRE peptide is presented. As more HLA binding data become available, new predictive models allowing for the direct estimation of HLA binding for peptides containing UAA can be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":73080,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in drug discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026553/pdf/nihms-1854666.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In silico</i> Immunogenicity Assessment for Sequences Containing Unnatural Amino Acids: A Method Using Existing <i>in silico</i> Algorithm Infrastructure and a Vision for Future Enhancements.\",\"authors\":\"Aimee E Mattei,&nbsp;Andres H Gutierrez,&nbsp;William D Martin,&nbsp;Frances E Terry,&nbsp;Brian J Roberts,&nbsp;Amy S Rosenberg,&nbsp;Anne S De Groot\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fddsv.2022.952326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The <i>in silico</i> prediction of T cell epitopes within any peptide or biologic drug candidate serves as an important first step for assessing immunogenicity. T cell epitopes bind human leukocyte antigen (HLA) by a well-characterized interaction of amino acid side chains and pockets in the HLA molecule binding groove. Immunoinformatics tools, such as the EpiMatrix algorithm, have been developed to screen natural amino acid sequences for peptides that will bind HLA. In addition to commonly occurring in synthetic peptide impurities, unnatural amino acids (UAA) are also often incorporated into novel peptide therapeutics to improve properties of the drug product. To date, the HLA binding properties of peptides containing UAA are not accurately estimated by most algorithms. Both scenarios warrant the need for enhanced predictive tools. The authors developed an <i>in silico</i> method for modeling the impact of a given UAA on a peptide's likelihood of binding to HLA and, by extension, its immunogenic potential. <i>In silico</i> assessment of immunogenic potential allows for risk-based selection of best candidate peptides in further confirmatory <i>in vitro, ex vivo</i> and <i>in vivo</i> assays, thereby reducing the overall cost of immunogenicity evaluation. Examples demonstrating <i>in silico</i> immunogenicity prediction for product impurities that are commonly found in formulations of the generic peptides teriparatide and semaglutide are provided. Next, this article discusses how HLA binding studies can be used to estimate the binding potentials of commonly encountered UAA and \\\"correct\\\" <i>in silico</i> estimates of binding based on their naturally occurring counterparts. As demonstrated here, these in vitro binding studies are usually performed with known ligands which have been modified to contain UAA in HLA anchor positions. An example using D-amino acids in relative binding position 1 (P1) of the PADRE peptide is presented. As more HLA binding data become available, new predictive models allowing for the direct estimation of HLA binding for peptides containing UAA can be established.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in drug discovery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026553/pdf/nihms-1854666.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in drug discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fddsv.2022.952326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fddsv.2022.952326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

任何肽或候选生物药物中的T细胞表位的计算机预测是评估免疫原性的重要第一步。T细胞表位与人白细胞抗原(HLA)通过氨基酸侧链和HLA分子结合槽中的口袋的相互作用。免疫信息学工具,如EpiMatrix算法,已经开发用于筛选天然氨基酸序列的肽将结合HLA。除了通常出现在合成肽杂质中,非天然氨基酸(UAA)也经常被纳入新的肽疗法中以改善药物产品的性能。迄今为止,大多数算法都不能准确地估计含有UAA的肽的HLA结合特性。这两种情况都需要增强预测工具。作者开发了一种计算机方法来模拟给定UAA对肽与HLA结合的可能性的影响,并由此扩展其免疫原性潜力。免疫原性潜力的计算机评估允许基于风险选择最佳候选肽,进一步在体外、离体和体内验证,从而降低免疫原性评估的总体成本。提供了在硅片上演示对一般多肽teriparatide和semaglutide制剂中常见的产物杂质的免疫原性预测的实例。接下来,本文讨论了如何使用HLA结合研究来估计常见的UAA的结合潜力,并根据自然存在的UAA“正确”地进行计算机估计。如本文所示,这些体外结合研究通常是在已知的配体上进行的,这些配体被修饰为在HLA锚点位置含有UAA。介绍了在PADRE肽的相对结合位置1 (P1)上使用d -氨基酸的例子。随着越来越多的HLA结合数据的出现,新的预测模型可以直接估计含有UAA的肽的HLA结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In silico Immunogenicity Assessment for Sequences Containing Unnatural Amino Acids: A Method Using Existing in silico Algorithm Infrastructure and a Vision for Future Enhancements.

The in silico prediction of T cell epitopes within any peptide or biologic drug candidate serves as an important first step for assessing immunogenicity. T cell epitopes bind human leukocyte antigen (HLA) by a well-characterized interaction of amino acid side chains and pockets in the HLA molecule binding groove. Immunoinformatics tools, such as the EpiMatrix algorithm, have been developed to screen natural amino acid sequences for peptides that will bind HLA. In addition to commonly occurring in synthetic peptide impurities, unnatural amino acids (UAA) are also often incorporated into novel peptide therapeutics to improve properties of the drug product. To date, the HLA binding properties of peptides containing UAA are not accurately estimated by most algorithms. Both scenarios warrant the need for enhanced predictive tools. The authors developed an in silico method for modeling the impact of a given UAA on a peptide's likelihood of binding to HLA and, by extension, its immunogenic potential. In silico assessment of immunogenic potential allows for risk-based selection of best candidate peptides in further confirmatory in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assays, thereby reducing the overall cost of immunogenicity evaluation. Examples demonstrating in silico immunogenicity prediction for product impurities that are commonly found in formulations of the generic peptides teriparatide and semaglutide are provided. Next, this article discusses how HLA binding studies can be used to estimate the binding potentials of commonly encountered UAA and "correct" in silico estimates of binding based on their naturally occurring counterparts. As demonstrated here, these in vitro binding studies are usually performed with known ligands which have been modified to contain UAA in HLA anchor positions. An example using D-amino acids in relative binding position 1 (P1) of the PADRE peptide is presented. As more HLA binding data become available, new predictive models allowing for the direct estimation of HLA binding for peptides containing UAA can be established.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mimicking the immunosuppressive impact of fibroblasts in a 3D multicellular spheroid model Alternative therapeutics to control antimicrobial resistance: a general perspective Editorial: The boulder peptide symposium 2021 scientific update Applying artificial intelligence to accelerate and de-risk antibody discovery Editorial: Women in anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating agents: 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1