直井加气欠平衡钻井的改进水力学模型

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Upstream Oil and Gas Technology Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100009
Adesina Fadairo , Kegang Ling , Vamegh Rasouli , Ademola Adelakun , Olusegun Tomomewo
{"title":"直井加气欠平衡钻井的改进水力学模型","authors":"Adesina Fadairo ,&nbsp;Kegang Ling ,&nbsp;Vamegh Rasouli ,&nbsp;Ademola Adelakun ,&nbsp;Olusegun Tomomewo","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Inability to accurately model fundamental governing flow equation in a hole has resulted in erotic evaluation of flowing and shut-in bottom hole pressures (BHPs) for aerated fluid drilling in borehole. It is of practical important to derive an exact model for this case without ignoring any pressure resisting terms in the governing thermodynamic equation so as to enhance well control efficiently. An improved </span>hydraulics model<span> has been derived to demonstrate the impact of neglected pressure restriction due to kinetic energy and fluid accumulation in the fundamental energy equation used for predicting flowing and shut-in bottom-hole pressures for aerated mud drilling in petroleum well. These neglected terms have conceived to be a vital reason for the eroneous result between computed value from the existing models and actual value generated from field. The developed model has been tested using the same dataset obtained from the field of investigation by Guo et al and more desirable outcomes were got from the new model than the previous investigators with error margin of 2.7%. Realistic results that evident all pressure transverse behaviors after shut-in for aerated mud drilling in well which include the initial constant pressure regime, unsteady regime, semi-steady regime and stabilized state condition hence pressure transverse at any period of drilling operation has been established. The improved model has demonstrated that inaccuracy in the results of existing models were not only caused by the effect of pressure restriction due to friction as opined by Guo et al but may have due to oversight of all pressure restriction terms in the fundamental equation that govern flow of aerated drilling fluid in petroleum well. The new concept is useful for drilling engineers to estimate flowing and shut in bottom-hole pressure for better control of well stability at all flow conditions during aerated mud underbalanced drilling.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100009","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved hydraulics model for aerated fluid underbalanced drilling in vertical wells\",\"authors\":\"Adesina Fadairo ,&nbsp;Kegang Ling ,&nbsp;Vamegh Rasouli ,&nbsp;Ademola Adelakun ,&nbsp;Olusegun Tomomewo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Inability to accurately model fundamental governing flow equation in a hole has resulted in erotic evaluation of flowing and shut-in bottom hole pressures (BHPs) for aerated fluid drilling in borehole. It is of practical important to derive an exact model for this case without ignoring any pressure resisting terms in the governing thermodynamic equation so as to enhance well control efficiently. An improved </span>hydraulics model<span> has been derived to demonstrate the impact of neglected pressure restriction due to kinetic energy and fluid accumulation in the fundamental energy equation used for predicting flowing and shut-in bottom-hole pressures for aerated mud drilling in petroleum well. These neglected terms have conceived to be a vital reason for the eroneous result between computed value from the existing models and actual value generated from field. The developed model has been tested using the same dataset obtained from the field of investigation by Guo et al and more desirable outcomes were got from the new model than the previous investigators with error margin of 2.7%. Realistic results that evident all pressure transverse behaviors after shut-in for aerated mud drilling in well which include the initial constant pressure regime, unsteady regime, semi-steady regime and stabilized state condition hence pressure transverse at any period of drilling operation has been established. The improved model has demonstrated that inaccuracy in the results of existing models were not only caused by the effect of pressure restriction due to friction as opined by Guo et al but may have due to oversight of all pressure restriction terms in the fundamental equation that govern flow of aerated drilling fluid in petroleum well. The new concept is useful for drilling engineers to estimate flowing and shut in bottom-hole pressure for better control of well stability at all flow conditions during aerated mud underbalanced drilling.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100009\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260420300098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260420300098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

由于无法准确地建立井内基本的控制流动方程,导致对加气钻井液钻井的流动和关井井底压力(BHPs)的评估存在缺陷。如何在不忽略控制热力学方程中任何抗压项的情况下推导出精确的模型,对有效地加强井控具有重要的现实意义。推导了一种改进的水力学模型,以证明在用于预测油气加气泥浆钻井的流动和关井井底压力的基本能量方程中,由于动能和流体积聚而忽略压力限制的影响。这些被忽视的术语被认为是现有模式的计算值与实地产生的实际值之间的献礼结果的一个重要原因。使用Guo等人从调查领域获得的相同数据集对开发的模型进行了测试,新模型比以前的研究者得到了更理想的结果,误差范围为2.7%。建立了曝气泥浆钻井关井后的压力横向特征,包括初始恒压状态、不稳定状态、半稳定状态和稳定状态,从而建立了钻井作业任何时期的压力横向特征。改进后的模型表明,现有模型结果的不准确性不仅是由于Guo等人认为的摩擦压力限制的影响造成的,而且可能是由于控制油井中加气钻井液流动的基本方程中所有压力限制项的疏忽造成的。在加气泥浆欠平衡钻井过程中,新概念有助于钻井工程师估算流动和关井井底压力,从而更好地控制各种流动条件下的井稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An improved hydraulics model for aerated fluid underbalanced drilling in vertical wells

Inability to accurately model fundamental governing flow equation in a hole has resulted in erotic evaluation of flowing and shut-in bottom hole pressures (BHPs) for aerated fluid drilling in borehole. It is of practical important to derive an exact model for this case without ignoring any pressure resisting terms in the governing thermodynamic equation so as to enhance well control efficiently. An improved hydraulics model has been derived to demonstrate the impact of neglected pressure restriction due to kinetic energy and fluid accumulation in the fundamental energy equation used for predicting flowing and shut-in bottom-hole pressures for aerated mud drilling in petroleum well. These neglected terms have conceived to be a vital reason for the eroneous result between computed value from the existing models and actual value generated from field. The developed model has been tested using the same dataset obtained from the field of investigation by Guo et al and more desirable outcomes were got from the new model than the previous investigators with error margin of 2.7%. Realistic results that evident all pressure transverse behaviors after shut-in for aerated mud drilling in well which include the initial constant pressure regime, unsteady regime, semi-steady regime and stabilized state condition hence pressure transverse at any period of drilling operation has been established. The improved model has demonstrated that inaccuracy in the results of existing models were not only caused by the effect of pressure restriction due to friction as opined by Guo et al but may have due to oversight of all pressure restriction terms in the fundamental equation that govern flow of aerated drilling fluid in petroleum well. The new concept is useful for drilling engineers to estimate flowing and shut in bottom-hole pressure for better control of well stability at all flow conditions during aerated mud underbalanced drilling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of pump jacks with theories and experiments Well perforating—More than reservoir connection A new method for predicting casing wear in highly deviated wells using mud logging data Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry A Review of Modern Approaches of Digitalization in Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1