PREDICT预后模型的开发和验证初级保健成年患者抑郁症复发:PREDICT研究方案。

Andrew S Moriarty, Lewis W Paton, Kym I E Snell, Richard D Riley, Joshua E J Buckman, Simon Gilbody, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Shehzad Ali, Stephen Pilling, Nick Meader, Bob Phillips, Peter A Coventry, Jaime Delgadillo, David A Richards, Chris Salisbury, Dean McMillan
{"title":"PREDICT预后模型的开发和验证初级保健成年患者抑郁症复发:PREDICT研究方案。","authors":"Andrew S Moriarty,&nbsp;Lewis W Paton,&nbsp;Kym I E Snell,&nbsp;Richard D Riley,&nbsp;Joshua E J Buckman,&nbsp;Simon Gilbody,&nbsp;Carolyn A Chew-Graham,&nbsp;Shehzad Ali,&nbsp;Stephen Pilling,&nbsp;Nick Meader,&nbsp;Bob Phillips,&nbsp;Peter A Coventry,&nbsp;Jaime Delgadillo,&nbsp;David A Richards,&nbsp;Chris Salisbury,&nbsp;Dean McMillan","doi":"10.1186/s41512-021-00101-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients who present with depression are treated in primary care by general practitioners (GPs). Relapse of depression is common (at least 50% of patients treated for depression will relapse after a single episode) and leads to considerable morbidity and decreased quality of life for patients. The majority of patients will relapse within 6 months, and those with a history of relapse are more likely to relapse in the future than those with no such history. GPs see a largely undifferentiated case-mix of patients, and once patients with depression reach remission, there is limited guidance to help GPs stratify patients according to risk of relapse. We aim to develop a prognostic model to predict an individual's risk of relapse within 6-8 months of entering remission. The long-term objective is to inform the clinical management of depression after the acute phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will develop a prognostic model using secondary analysis of individual participant data drawn from seven RCTs and one longitudinal cohort study in primary or community care settings. We will use logistic regression to predict the outcome of relapse of depression within 6-8 months. We plan to include the following established relapse predictors in the model: residual depressive symptoms, number of previous depressive episodes, co-morbid anxiety and severity of index episode. We will use a \"full model\" development approach, including all available predictors. Performance statistics (optimism-adjusted C-statistic, calibration-in-the-large, calibration slope) and calibration plots (with smoothed calibration curves) will be calculated. Generalisability of predictive performance will be assessed through internal-external cross-validation. Clinical utility will be explored through net benefit analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We will derive a statistical model to predict relapse of depression in remitted depressed patients in primary care. Assuming the model has sufficient predictive performance, we outline the next steps including independent external validation and further assessment of clinical utility and impact.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04666662.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":"5 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41512-021-00101-x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development and validation of a prognostic model to PREDICT Relapse of depression in adult patients in primary care: protocol for the PREDICTR study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew S Moriarty,&nbsp;Lewis W Paton,&nbsp;Kym I E Snell,&nbsp;Richard D Riley,&nbsp;Joshua E J Buckman,&nbsp;Simon Gilbody,&nbsp;Carolyn A Chew-Graham,&nbsp;Shehzad Ali,&nbsp;Stephen Pilling,&nbsp;Nick Meader,&nbsp;Bob Phillips,&nbsp;Peter A Coventry,&nbsp;Jaime Delgadillo,&nbsp;David A Richards,&nbsp;Chris Salisbury,&nbsp;Dean McMillan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41512-021-00101-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients who present with depression are treated in primary care by general practitioners (GPs). Relapse of depression is common (at least 50% of patients treated for depression will relapse after a single episode) and leads to considerable morbidity and decreased quality of life for patients. The majority of patients will relapse within 6 months, and those with a history of relapse are more likely to relapse in the future than those with no such history. GPs see a largely undifferentiated case-mix of patients, and once patients with depression reach remission, there is limited guidance to help GPs stratify patients according to risk of relapse. We aim to develop a prognostic model to predict an individual's risk of relapse within 6-8 months of entering remission. The long-term objective is to inform the clinical management of depression after the acute phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will develop a prognostic model using secondary analysis of individual participant data drawn from seven RCTs and one longitudinal cohort study in primary or community care settings. We will use logistic regression to predict the outcome of relapse of depression within 6-8 months. We plan to include the following established relapse predictors in the model: residual depressive symptoms, number of previous depressive episodes, co-morbid anxiety and severity of index episode. We will use a \\\"full model\\\" development approach, including all available predictors. Performance statistics (optimism-adjusted C-statistic, calibration-in-the-large, calibration slope) and calibration plots (with smoothed calibration curves) will be calculated. Generalisability of predictive performance will be assessed through internal-external cross-validation. Clinical utility will be explored through net benefit analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We will derive a statistical model to predict relapse of depression in remitted depressed patients in primary care. Assuming the model has sufficient predictive performance, we outline the next steps including independent external validation and further assessment of clinical utility and impact.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04666662.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41512-021-00101-x\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00101-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00101-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:大多数抑郁症患者在初级保健中接受全科医生的治疗。抑郁症复发很常见(至少50%的抑郁症患者在一次发作后会复发),并导致相当大的发病率和患者生活质量下降。大多数患者会在6个月内复发,有复发史的患者比没有复发史的人更有可能在未来复发。全科医生看到的患者基本上是未分化的,一旦抑郁症患者病情缓解,帮助全科医生根据复发风险对患者进行分层的指导有限。我们的目的是开发一个预后模型来预测个体在病情缓解后6-8个月内复发的风险。长期目标是为急性期后抑郁症的临床管理提供信息。方法:我们将使用从七项随机对照试验和一项在初级或社区护理环境中的纵向队列研究中提取的个人参与者数据的二次分析来开发预后模型。我们将使用逻辑回归来预测6-8个月内抑郁症复发的结果。我们计划在模型中纳入以下已确定的复发预测因素:残余抑郁症状、既往抑郁发作次数、共病焦虑和指数发作的严重程度。我们将使用“全模型”开发方法,包括所有可用的预测因素。将计算性能统计数据(乐观调整的C统计数据、大范围校准、校准斜率)和校准图(具有平滑校准曲线)。预测性能的通用性将通过内部-外部交叉验证进行评估。临床效用将通过净效益分析进行探索。讨论:我们将推导一个统计模型来预测初级保健中缓解的抑郁症患者的抑郁症复发。假设该模型具有足够的预测性能,我们概述了下一步的步骤,包括独立的外部验证和对临床效用和影响的进一步评估。研究注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT04666662。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The development and validation of a prognostic model to PREDICT Relapse of depression in adult patients in primary care: protocol for the PREDICTR study.

Background: Most patients who present with depression are treated in primary care by general practitioners (GPs). Relapse of depression is common (at least 50% of patients treated for depression will relapse after a single episode) and leads to considerable morbidity and decreased quality of life for patients. The majority of patients will relapse within 6 months, and those with a history of relapse are more likely to relapse in the future than those with no such history. GPs see a largely undifferentiated case-mix of patients, and once patients with depression reach remission, there is limited guidance to help GPs stratify patients according to risk of relapse. We aim to develop a prognostic model to predict an individual's risk of relapse within 6-8 months of entering remission. The long-term objective is to inform the clinical management of depression after the acute phase.

Methods: We will develop a prognostic model using secondary analysis of individual participant data drawn from seven RCTs and one longitudinal cohort study in primary or community care settings. We will use logistic regression to predict the outcome of relapse of depression within 6-8 months. We plan to include the following established relapse predictors in the model: residual depressive symptoms, number of previous depressive episodes, co-morbid anxiety and severity of index episode. We will use a "full model" development approach, including all available predictors. Performance statistics (optimism-adjusted C-statistic, calibration-in-the-large, calibration slope) and calibration plots (with smoothed calibration curves) will be calculated. Generalisability of predictive performance will be assessed through internal-external cross-validation. Clinical utility will be explored through net benefit analysis.

Discussion: We will derive a statistical model to predict relapse of depression in remitted depressed patients in primary care. Assuming the model has sufficient predictive performance, we outline the next steps including independent external validation and further assessment of clinical utility and impact.

Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04666662.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews reporting model development and validation methods. Rehabilitation outcomes after comprehensive post-acute inpatient rehabilitation following moderate to severe acquired brain injury-study protocol for an overall prognosis study based on routinely collected health data. Validation of prognostic models predicting mortality or ICU admission in patients with COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries: a global individual participant data meta-analysis. Reported prevalence and comparison of diagnostic approaches for Candida africana: a systematic review with meta-analysis. The relative data hungriness of unpenalized and penalized logistic regression and ensemble-based machine learning methods: the case of calibration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1