私营医疗公司无烟工作场所干预的实施保真度:混合方法过程评估。

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2023-05-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/162878
Sofie K B Rasmussen, Lærke L Lidegaard, Charlotta Pisinger, Nina F Johnsen, Maria Kristiansen
{"title":"私营医疗公司无烟工作场所干预的实施保真度:混合方法过程评估。","authors":"Sofie K B Rasmussen,&nbsp;Lærke L Lidegaard,&nbsp;Charlotta Pisinger,&nbsp;Nina F Johnsen,&nbsp;Maria Kristiansen","doi":"10.18332/tpc/162878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoke-free workplaces are considered an important part of tobacco control strategies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate implementation fidelity and explore the significance of social and contextual factors for the implementation of a strict smoke-free workplace intervention in a large Danish medical company.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UK Medical Research Council's guidance for process evaluation was used as a framework. Data were collected from approximately six months before the implementation until ten months after (2019-2020). A mixed method study design was used (a survey of 398 employees, a focus group of four employees and field visits on two days). Data were analyzed separately and later integrated through triangulation. We used the Fisher's exact test in the analysis of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed the implementation fidelity through four key factors: reach, dose and delivery, mechanisms of change, and context for the intervention components. Despite compliance issues, the policy component had high implementation fidelity. However, the implementation fidelity of the smoking cessation support component was low. We identified three social mechanisms influencing the employees' responsiveness towards the policy: expectation, the social aspect of the smoking facilities, and management leadership. COVID-19 was identified as the main contextual factor affecting the implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although not all elements of the intervention components were implemented as planned, the strict smoke-free workplace intervention is considered implemented. Further strategies can be initiated to raise implementation fidelity through better communication concerning the cessation support component, compliance, and enforcement of the policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"9 ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation fidelity of a smoke-free workplace intervention in a private medical company: A mixed-methods process evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Sofie K B Rasmussen,&nbsp;Lærke L Lidegaard,&nbsp;Charlotta Pisinger,&nbsp;Nina F Johnsen,&nbsp;Maria Kristiansen\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tpc/162878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoke-free workplaces are considered an important part of tobacco control strategies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate implementation fidelity and explore the significance of social and contextual factors for the implementation of a strict smoke-free workplace intervention in a large Danish medical company.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UK Medical Research Council's guidance for process evaluation was used as a framework. Data were collected from approximately six months before the implementation until ten months after (2019-2020). A mixed method study design was used (a survey of 398 employees, a focus group of four employees and field visits on two days). Data were analyzed separately and later integrated through triangulation. We used the Fisher's exact test in the analysis of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed the implementation fidelity through four key factors: reach, dose and delivery, mechanisms of change, and context for the intervention components. Despite compliance issues, the policy component had high implementation fidelity. However, the implementation fidelity of the smoking cessation support component was low. We identified three social mechanisms influencing the employees' responsiveness towards the policy: expectation, the social aspect of the smoking facilities, and management leadership. COVID-19 was identified as the main contextual factor affecting the implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although not all elements of the intervention components were implemented as planned, the strict smoke-free workplace intervention is considered implemented. Further strategies can be initiated to raise implementation fidelity through better communication concerning the cessation support component, compliance, and enforcement of the policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214475/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/162878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/162878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:无烟工作场所被认为是烟草控制战略的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是评估实施忠诚度,并探讨社会和背景因素对丹麦一家大型医疗公司实施严格无烟工作场所干预的意义。方法:采用英国医学研究委员会的过程评估指南作为框架。数据是从实施前大约六个月到实施后十个月(2019-2020)收集的。采用混合方法研究设计(对398名员工进行调查,四名员工组成焦点小组,两天进行实地考察)。数据分别进行分析,随后通过三角测量进行整合。我们在问卷分析中使用了Fisher精确检验。结果:我们通过四个关键因素评估了实施保真度:覆盖范围、剂量和交付、变化机制和干预成分的背景。尽管存在合规问题,但该政策组成部分的执行忠诚度很高。然而,戒烟支持部分的实施保真度很低。我们确定了影响员工对政策反应的三种社会机制:期望、吸烟设施的社会方面和管理领导力。新冠肺炎被确定为影响实施的主要背景因素。结论:尽管并非所有干预组成部分都按计划实施,但严格的无烟工作场所干预被认为是实施的。可以启动进一步的战略,通过更好地沟通有关停止支持部分、遵守和执行政策,提高执行忠诚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation fidelity of a smoke-free workplace intervention in a private medical company: A mixed-methods process evaluation.

Introduction: Smoke-free workplaces are considered an important part of tobacco control strategies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate implementation fidelity and explore the significance of social and contextual factors for the implementation of a strict smoke-free workplace intervention in a large Danish medical company.

Methods: The UK Medical Research Council's guidance for process evaluation was used as a framework. Data were collected from approximately six months before the implementation until ten months after (2019-2020). A mixed method study design was used (a survey of 398 employees, a focus group of four employees and field visits on two days). Data were analyzed separately and later integrated through triangulation. We used the Fisher's exact test in the analysis of the questionnaire.

Results: We assessed the implementation fidelity through four key factors: reach, dose and delivery, mechanisms of change, and context for the intervention components. Despite compliance issues, the policy component had high implementation fidelity. However, the implementation fidelity of the smoking cessation support component was low. We identified three social mechanisms influencing the employees' responsiveness towards the policy: expectation, the social aspect of the smoking facilities, and management leadership. COVID-19 was identified as the main contextual factor affecting the implementation.

Conclusions: Although not all elements of the intervention components were implemented as planned, the strict smoke-free workplace intervention is considered implemented. Further strategies can be initiated to raise implementation fidelity through better communication concerning the cessation support component, compliance, and enforcement of the policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inequitable exposure to tobacco product litter among adolescents in California, USA. Stakeholder perspectives of tobacco use on campus and implementation of a tobacco-free policy at a Midwest university. Efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in populations with psychiatric and/or substance use problems: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Investigating an e-cigarette brand's use of music festivals for social media campaigns and experiential marketing. Targeted distribution of nicotine patches by mail to rural regions of Canada: Predictors of patch use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1