慢性心力衰竭患者自我倡导的预测因素

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Applied Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151694
Carolyn Kleman , Ratchneewan Ross
{"title":"慢性心力衰竭患者自我倡导的预测因素","authors":"Carolyn Kleman ,&nbsp;Ratchneewan Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of self-advocacy among patients with chronic heart failure (HF) as they were unknown. A convenience sample of 80 participants recruited from one Midwestern HF clinic completed surveys related to relationship-based predictors of patient self-advocacy including trust in nurses and social support. Self-advocacy is operationalized using the three dimensions of HF knowledge, assertiveness, and intentional non-adherence. Hierarchical multiple regression was used showing that trust in nurses predicted HF knowledge (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.070, F = 5.91, <em>p</em> &lt; .05), social support predicted advocacy assertiveness (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.068, F = 5.67, <em>p</em> &lt; .05), and ethnicity predicted overall self-advocacy (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.059, F = 4.89, p &lt; .05). These findings suggest that support from family and friends can give the patient the needed encouragement to advocate for what they need. A trusting relationship with nurses impacts patient education so that patients not only understand their illness and its trajectory but also use that understanding to speak up for themselves. African American patients, who are less likely to self-advocate than their White counterparts, could benefit from nurses recognizing the impact of implicit bias so that these patients do not feel silenced in their care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of patient self-advocacy among patients with chronic heart failure\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn Kleman ,&nbsp;Ratchneewan Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of self-advocacy among patients with chronic heart failure (HF) as they were unknown. A convenience sample of 80 participants recruited from one Midwestern HF clinic completed surveys related to relationship-based predictors of patient self-advocacy including trust in nurses and social support. Self-advocacy is operationalized using the three dimensions of HF knowledge, assertiveness, and intentional non-adherence. Hierarchical multiple regression was used showing that trust in nurses predicted HF knowledge (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.070, F = 5.91, <em>p</em> &lt; .05), social support predicted advocacy assertiveness (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.068, F = 5.67, <em>p</em> &lt; .05), and ethnicity predicted overall self-advocacy (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.059, F = 4.89, p &lt; .05). These findings suggest that support from family and friends can give the patient the needed encouragement to advocate for what they need. A trusting relationship with nurses impacts patient education so that patients not only understand their illness and its trajectory but also use that understanding to speak up for themselves. African American patients, who are less likely to self-advocate than their White counterparts, could benefit from nurses recognizing the impact of implicit bias so that these patients do not feel silenced in their care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Nursing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189723000289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189723000289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是检查慢性心力衰竭(HF)患者自我倡导的预测因素,因为他们是未知的。从中西部一家HF诊所招募的80名参与者的便利样本完成了与基于关系的患者自我倡导预测因素相关的调查,包括对护士的信任和社会支持。自我倡导使用HF知识、自信和故意不遵守这三个维度进行操作。使用分层多元回归显示,对护士的信任预测HF知识(ΔR2=0.070,F=5.91,p<;.05),社会支持预测倡导自信(ΔR2=0.068,F=5.67,p<;.05),种族预测了整体自我倡导(ΔR2=0.059,F=4.89,p<;.05)。这些发现表明,来自家人和朋友的支持可以给患者必要的鼓励,让他们倡导自己需要的东西。与护士的信任关系会影响患者教育,使患者不仅了解自己的疾病及其发展轨迹,还可以利用这种理解为自己发声。与白人患者相比,非裔美国患者不太可能自我辩护,护士可以从中受益,认识到隐性偏见的影响,这样这些患者在护理中就不会感到沉默。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of patient self-advocacy among patients with chronic heart failure

The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of self-advocacy among patients with chronic heart failure (HF) as they were unknown. A convenience sample of 80 participants recruited from one Midwestern HF clinic completed surveys related to relationship-based predictors of patient self-advocacy including trust in nurses and social support. Self-advocacy is operationalized using the three dimensions of HF knowledge, assertiveness, and intentional non-adherence. Hierarchical multiple regression was used showing that trust in nurses predicted HF knowledge (ΔR2 = 0.070, F = 5.91, p < .05), social support predicted advocacy assertiveness (ΔR2 = 0.068, F = 5.67, p < .05), and ethnicity predicted overall self-advocacy (ΔR2 = 0.059, F = 4.89, p < .05). These findings suggest that support from family and friends can give the patient the needed encouragement to advocate for what they need. A trusting relationship with nurses impacts patient education so that patients not only understand their illness and its trajectory but also use that understanding to speak up for themselves. African American patients, who are less likely to self-advocate than their White counterparts, could benefit from nurses recognizing the impact of implicit bias so that these patients do not feel silenced in their care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “A hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design to evaluate a community-based, heart-healthy intervention for women of low-socioeconomic status” [Appl. Nurs. Res. 71, 2023, 151686] Are male nurses oppressed? A forum theater application: A quasi-experimental study Changes in nutritional status and fatigue and their associations with quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer after surgery: A 12-month longitudinal study Stress coping and resilience of frontline nurses under the emergency infectious disease pandemic: A latent class analysis Emergency department nurses' reflective thinking and patient safety competency: The mediating effect of patient safety culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1