JB Montgomery , SJ Raymond , FM O’Sullivan , JR Williams
{"title":"页岩气产量预测是一个病态逆问题,需要正则化","authors":"JB Montgomery , SJ Raymond , FM O’Sullivan , JR Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decline curve analysis<span><span> (DCA)—the extrapolation of a production curve model fitted to a well’s past production—remains the standard approach for forecasting unconventional oil and gas production. A scaling curve based on a fractured shale gas reservoir model was recently proposed as a way of connecting this approach with underlying physics but as this paper shows, it actually generates worse predictions than the traditional non-physical modified Arps curve. DCA is fundamentally an ill-posed inverse problem with the defining characteristic of model sloppiness, or parameter correlation. Today’s unconventional resource forecasts can be substantially improved by using information from offset wells to reduce ill-posedness through Tikhonov regularization. This versatile approach nearly matches a </span>deep neural network<span> approach introduced here, which has practical limitations but offers a model-neutral benchmark of achievable extrapolation accuracy. There is a natural connection between regularization and a Bayesian formulation which is also highlighted. This paper evaluates long-term forecasting accuracy for these techniques using historic production data from 4457 Barnett shale wells, and reveals that the overlooked step of regularization is more critical than choice of model.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shale gas production forecasting is an ill-posed inverse problem and requires regularization\",\"authors\":\"JB Montgomery , SJ Raymond , FM O’Sullivan , JR Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Decline curve analysis<span><span> (DCA)—the extrapolation of a production curve model fitted to a well’s past production—remains the standard approach for forecasting unconventional oil and gas production. A scaling curve based on a fractured shale gas reservoir model was recently proposed as a way of connecting this approach with underlying physics but as this paper shows, it actually generates worse predictions than the traditional non-physical modified Arps curve. DCA is fundamentally an ill-posed inverse problem with the defining characteristic of model sloppiness, or parameter correlation. Today’s unconventional resource forecasts can be substantially improved by using information from offset wells to reduce ill-posedness through Tikhonov regularization. This versatile approach nearly matches a </span>deep neural network<span> approach introduced here, which has practical limitations but offers a model-neutral benchmark of achievable extrapolation accuracy. There is a natural connection between regularization and a Bayesian formulation which is also highlighted. This paper evaluates long-term forecasting accuracy for these techniques using historic production data from 4457 Barnett shale wells, and reveals that the overlooked step of regularization is more critical than choice of model.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260420300220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260420300220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shale gas production forecasting is an ill-posed inverse problem and requires regularization
Decline curve analysis (DCA)—the extrapolation of a production curve model fitted to a well’s past production—remains the standard approach for forecasting unconventional oil and gas production. A scaling curve based on a fractured shale gas reservoir model was recently proposed as a way of connecting this approach with underlying physics but as this paper shows, it actually generates worse predictions than the traditional non-physical modified Arps curve. DCA is fundamentally an ill-posed inverse problem with the defining characteristic of model sloppiness, or parameter correlation. Today’s unconventional resource forecasts can be substantially improved by using information from offset wells to reduce ill-posedness through Tikhonov regularization. This versatile approach nearly matches a deep neural network approach introduced here, which has practical limitations but offers a model-neutral benchmark of achievable extrapolation accuracy. There is a natural connection between regularization and a Bayesian formulation which is also highlighted. This paper evaluates long-term forecasting accuracy for these techniques using historic production data from 4457 Barnett shale wells, and reveals that the overlooked step of regularization is more critical than choice of model.