页岩气产量预测是一个病态逆问题,需要正则化

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Upstream Oil and Gas Technology Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022
JB Montgomery , SJ Raymond , FM O’Sullivan , JR Williams
{"title":"页岩气产量预测是一个病态逆问题,需要正则化","authors":"JB Montgomery ,&nbsp;SJ Raymond ,&nbsp;FM O’Sullivan ,&nbsp;JR Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decline curve analysis<span><span> (DCA)—the extrapolation of a production curve model fitted to a well’s past production—remains the standard approach for forecasting unconventional oil and gas production. A scaling curve based on a fractured shale gas reservoir model was recently proposed as a way of connecting this approach with underlying physics but as this paper shows, it actually generates worse predictions than the traditional non-physical modified Arps curve. DCA is fundamentally an ill-posed inverse problem with the defining characteristic of model sloppiness, or parameter correlation. Today’s unconventional resource forecasts can be substantially improved by using information from offset wells to reduce ill-posedness through Tikhonov regularization. This versatile approach nearly matches a </span>deep neural network<span> approach introduced here, which has practical limitations but offers a model-neutral benchmark of achievable extrapolation accuracy. There is a natural connection between regularization and a Bayesian formulation which is also highlighted. This paper evaluates long-term forecasting accuracy for these techniques using historic production data from 4457 Barnett shale wells, and reveals that the overlooked step of regularization is more critical than choice of model.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shale gas production forecasting is an ill-posed inverse problem and requires regularization\",\"authors\":\"JB Montgomery ,&nbsp;SJ Raymond ,&nbsp;FM O’Sullivan ,&nbsp;JR Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Decline curve analysis<span><span> (DCA)—the extrapolation of a production curve model fitted to a well’s past production—remains the standard approach for forecasting unconventional oil and gas production. A scaling curve based on a fractured shale gas reservoir model was recently proposed as a way of connecting this approach with underlying physics but as this paper shows, it actually generates worse predictions than the traditional non-physical modified Arps curve. DCA is fundamentally an ill-posed inverse problem with the defining characteristic of model sloppiness, or parameter correlation. Today’s unconventional resource forecasts can be substantially improved by using information from offset wells to reduce ill-posedness through Tikhonov regularization. This versatile approach nearly matches a </span>deep neural network<span> approach introduced here, which has practical limitations but offers a model-neutral benchmark of achievable extrapolation accuracy. There is a natural connection between regularization and a Bayesian formulation which is also highlighted. This paper evaluates long-term forecasting accuracy for these techniques using historic production data from 4457 Barnett shale wells, and reveals that the overlooked step of regularization is more critical than choice of model.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100022\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260420300220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260420300220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

递减曲线分析(DCA)是根据一口井过去的产量推导出的生产曲线模型,目前仍然是预测非常规油气产量的标准方法。最近,人们提出了一种基于裂缝性页岩气储层模型的标度曲线,将该方法与底层物理联系起来,但正如本文所示,它实际上比传统的非物理修正Arps曲线产生的预测结果更差。DCA本质上是一个病态逆问题,具有模型马虎性或参数相关性的定义特征。利用邻井的信息,通过吉洪诺夫正则化来减少病态,可以大大改善非常规资源的预测。这种通用的方法几乎与这里介绍的深度神经网络方法相匹配,深度神经网络方法具有实际局限性,但提供了可实现的外推精度的模型中立基准。在正则化和贝叶斯公式之间有一种自然的联系,这也被强调了。本文利用4457口Barnett页岩井的历史产量数据,对这些技术的长期预测精度进行了评估,发现被忽视的正则化步骤比模型的选择更为关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shale gas production forecasting is an ill-posed inverse problem and requires regularization

Decline curve analysis (DCA)—the extrapolation of a production curve model fitted to a well’s past production—remains the standard approach for forecasting unconventional oil and gas production. A scaling curve based on a fractured shale gas reservoir model was recently proposed as a way of connecting this approach with underlying physics but as this paper shows, it actually generates worse predictions than the traditional non-physical modified Arps curve. DCA is fundamentally an ill-posed inverse problem with the defining characteristic of model sloppiness, or parameter correlation. Today’s unconventional resource forecasts can be substantially improved by using information from offset wells to reduce ill-posedness through Tikhonov regularization. This versatile approach nearly matches a deep neural network approach introduced here, which has practical limitations but offers a model-neutral benchmark of achievable extrapolation accuracy. There is a natural connection between regularization and a Bayesian formulation which is also highlighted. This paper evaluates long-term forecasting accuracy for these techniques using historic production data from 4457 Barnett shale wells, and reveals that the overlooked step of regularization is more critical than choice of model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of pump jacks with theories and experiments Well perforating—More than reservoir connection A new method for predicting casing wear in highly deviated wells using mud logging data Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry A Review of Modern Approaches of Digitalization in Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1